Well thanks a lot for those replies! Gonna go through it more thoroughly in a sec, I just got home.
Methoxetamine is a 3-methoxy and it is quite active. The methoxy-cl substitution on the 2nd position of the phenyl group wasn't accompanied by any major change in activity according to your notes on the ketamine analogue. I know this isn't saying the same goes for the 3rd position on the phenyl ring, but still... MXE is a 3-meo and it seems that no other chloro-methoxyl substitution have been performed for us to judge the effects.
Regarding the halogens. We should remember chlorine is the least bulky of them all. Then again, it is also the most electronegative, so intuition would point towards size being the primary issue here, not electronegativity. I'd have no idea about the target protein structures, but if I had means to display the exact amino acid sequences around the pcp binding site, maybe that would give us a clue why Cl and MeO seem to fit, but other halogens don't. Does anyone from the top of their head know the exact length of a Cl and a methoxy group. Ofc it depends to what moledcule they are binding, but assuming a plain benzol ring with a methoxy OR a chloro group. Which one would be longer and by how many Angstrom?
I have the greatest reverence for your experience and knowledge on this topic, but MXE just seems to disprove your statement. The dosage is far below that of ketamine for example as well. We should probably instead ask ourselves: What does ketamine have that makes it so damn weak (dosage wise) compared to all the other arylcyclohexylamines (don't you love that word)?
edit: oh man, i want some software to display proteins, one that allows me to position potential ligands, ideally one that can run for a few days to find binding sites by itself or predict changes in conformation on the basis of known ligands' effects. fucking anatomy doesnt leave time for shit. if anyone can point me into the right direction, id really really appreciate it!! (got acd/labs already, havent even checked it out. still would be cool if i could at least prepare the software before diving into this...)
edit2: just found a list on that acd site. gonna be a long road ahead it seems, i dont understand half of those descriptions :D
http://www.acdlabs.com/products/auto_int/int/
im also DESPERATELY looking for someone who has access to this journal:
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/1386-2073
My one lecturer told he can get me single articles through a friend, but I wanna browse through it... Does anyone have access and can hook me up? Shit I'll pay you for it, not sure how and with what, but I would. Just don't have the cash for a subscription, I'm still studying, living alone with a daughter who is with me 3 days per week. So permabroke.
Methoxetamine is a 3-methoxy and it is quite active. The methoxy-cl substitution on the 2nd position of the phenyl group wasn't accompanied by any major change in activity according to your notes on the ketamine analogue. I know this isn't saying the same goes for the 3rd position on the phenyl ring, but still... MXE is a 3-meo and it seems that no other chloro-methoxyl substitution have been performed for us to judge the effects.
Regarding the halogens. We should remember chlorine is the least bulky of them all. Then again, it is also the most electronegative, so intuition would point towards size being the primary issue here, not electronegativity. I'd have no idea about the target protein structures, but if I had means to display the exact amino acid sequences around the pcp binding site, maybe that would give us a clue why Cl and MeO seem to fit, but other halogens don't. Does anyone from the top of their head know the exact length of a Cl and a methoxy group. Ofc it depends to what moledcule they are binding, but assuming a plain benzol ring with a methoxy OR a chloro group. Which one would be longer and by how many Angstrom?
I have the greatest reverence for your experience and knowledge on this topic, but MXE just seems to disprove your statement. The dosage is far below that of ketamine for example as well. We should probably instead ask ourselves: What does ketamine have that makes it so damn weak (dosage wise) compared to all the other arylcyclohexylamines (don't you love that word)?
edit: oh man, i want some software to display proteins, one that allows me to position potential ligands, ideally one that can run for a few days to find binding sites by itself or predict changes in conformation on the basis of known ligands' effects. fucking anatomy doesnt leave time for shit. if anyone can point me into the right direction, id really really appreciate it!! (got acd/labs already, havent even checked it out. still would be cool if i could at least prepare the software before diving into this...)
edit2: just found a list on that acd site. gonna be a long road ahead it seems, i dont understand half of those descriptions :D
http://www.acdlabs.com/products/auto_int/int/
im also DESPERATELY looking for someone who has access to this journal:
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/1386-2073
My one lecturer told he can get me single articles through a friend, but I wanna browse through it... Does anyone have access and can hook me up? Shit I'll pay you for it, not sure how and with what, but I would. Just don't have the cash for a subscription, I'm still studying, living alone with a daughter who is with me 3 days per week. So permabroke.
Last edited: