Overdose Stats Show Treatment Beats Jail

Tchort

Bluelight Crew
Joined
Mar 25, 2008
Messages
2,390
Baltimore Sun

7/2/2009


Here's a preview of an editorial we're working on. Let us know what you think by sending an e-mail to [email protected] We'll print the best comments alongside the editorial.

A generation ago, former Baltimore Mayor Kurt Schmoke urged lawmakers to consider abandoning the criminal justice model for dealing with the country's rampant drug problem and focus instead on treating people for their addictions. He was roundly criticized for the idea, and America went on to prosecute a fruitless "war on drugs" that two decades later it is still clearly losing.

But last week city health officials announced a small but significant victory in that struggle that may yet vindicate Mr. Schmoke's more humanistic approach to the scourge of substance abuse. Officials reported that deaths from alcohol and drug overdoses declined for the second straight year in the city and are now at their lowest levels in more than a decade. The reason? Expanded treatment opportunities for heroin users and programs that teach addicts how to avoid life-threatening overdoses even if they aren't able to completely break the cycle of dependence.

There's little doubt that treatment can save lives. Two years ago, a total of 281 people died of drug overdoses in Baltimore. That number dropped to 176 last year, a decline of nearly a third. Health officials say the improved statistics are directly attributable to more drug treatment slots made possible by a $1.1 million federal grant, and to education and outreach efforts such as the city's Staying Alive program, which instructs addicts how to spot the signs of overdose and intervene before it's too late.

The numbers would be even better if treatment were more widely available. Last year, a staggering 74,000 people in Baltimore required treatment for substance abuse by some estimates. Yet the city could only accommodate a fraction of that number -- some 16,000. Facilities that treat heroin addicts with buprenorphine, a semi-synthetic drug that health officials say can help decrease overdoses, have waiting lists of more than a year, and even addicts who have decided to seek help often can't get in.

Despite these limitations, the treatment model remains by far the more promising strategy for reducing the harm caused by substance abuse. Drugs and alcohol destroy families, communities and lives and drive most serious crime in the city. That's why Mr. Schmoke was right to insist that the only practical course lay in treating addiction as a public health problem rather than as a criminal justice matter. With addiction at epidemic levels -- nearly one in every six people in Baltimore struggles with a dependence on alcohol or drugs -- there's no way we're going to make a dent in this problem simply by locking more people up.

http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/opinion/editorial/bal-overdosepreview0702,0,1720450.story
 
Good to see more and more people coming out in favour of a sensible approach to drug use. 1 in 6 people in Baltimore with addiction problems seems like a lot, that sure is a lot of addicts.
 
Baltimore has long had a horrible Heroin problem. It's a major port for shipped goods, like Portland, Oregan, even New Orleans. These cities historically develop big drug problems early.

While an active Heroin addict I never went to Baltimore; always Washington D.C.; even though Baltimore is closer and easier to buy dope. The place always brings me down. Abandoned industrial parks; rows and blocks of empty buildings; shitty streets. It's depressing.

They have a horrible record for providing Methadone clinics adequate to fit the demand. They can't even get Buprenorphine right, and the regulations only require an 8 hour class for a doctor to prescribe it to 30/100 patients each. Sad indeed.
 
Top