Whoops it was your post.
Keep in mind that regardless of the content of that Facebook video, superimposed upon in big letters reads:
"No proof exists that this virus even exists".
Consider the many thousands of impressionable people who will come across that statement, leaving an indelible mark in some and repeated by others. This could absolutely contribute to already skeptical people becoming even more skeptical, and in turn, less cautious, thereby accelerating the spread and harming more people.
What good does the statement
"No proof exists that this virus even exists" do, particularly to the impressionable and undereducated people who spend hours upon hours on Facebook? Why would an articulate and ostensibly somewhat educated person like yourself feel compelled to share it here?
There is proof that SARS-CoV-2 does it exist, and it looks like this:
Notice the spike protein jutting out from the top. This is what makes it so infections and damaging to the lungs.
My apologies if I come off as a bit aggressive but after what I saw it is hard to remain civil.
TLDR TLDR TLDR TLDR TLDR
Well, no-one knows exactly what does exist. There's been no isolation of the virus, it hasn't been replicated and it's not available for analysis. I'm very skeptical of what does exist. I'm not defining it in a way that creates an imagined threat, like many people are. They are simply using their imagination to perceive something which requires objective, empirical and rational understanding. Much of that is lacking in the mainstream and in the main 'streets' of general discourse. I believe the threat has been massively over-exaggerated and what has taken hold is collective hysteria and something akin to shared delusions. The reality is the survival rate is 99.97% and this is confirmed by the CDC. It has already been long since acknowledged that the majority of the population will not die nor be severely affected. This is proven in the states. Right now the amount of active cases in the entire world in critical care is 0.5%. That's some 20 million plus active cases and 0.5% of those are critical. That's around 100,000 by the way. Not in the US, the UK, Europe. In the world.
Out of over 61 million closed cases, 3% of those died. That's almost 1,845,000 people. We have to also establish rationally how unreliable and flawed the tests are to define and diagnose COVID-19, openly admitted by the media and rightfully heavily criticized. So we have to bare in mind out of those deaths, how many concretely and without a shadow of a doubt died because (not with) COVID-19? How can we establish the difference? Alas, we can't. Here in the UK people are dying from car accidents and their death certificates say they died from COVID-19. People are dying from natural causes and the death certificate says COVID-19.
And this is also baring in mind the fact that almost 8 billion people live in the world and over 60,000,000 have recovered. What about the rest? If this virus has already span the entire world, which we have to assume it has, why isn't affecting everybody else? We fall back on the survival rate for that answer, 99.97%.
Showing graphics is no different to what other people are showing with superimposed text. What is the difference between your graphic and the one with superimposed text? Nobody can concretely prove what we are dealing with warrants the complete shutdown of the world and the reversal of several centuries of progress, And the person who says no-one can prove it exists also cannot concretely prove their point. It's rich that people are condemning one side while hailing the other while both are clueless in the grand scheme of things. What we do know is what we have available to us, namely information. The information does state a completely different picture to what is being painted, and that's before we get into the proven links to agendas happening behind the scenes. I say behind the scenes, much of it is actually out in the open. The shifts towards a new paradigm are evidently clear. The requirement to live with consequences of a so-called existential threat to humanity (despite it being one of the lowest ranked threats in recorded history) even after it's gone (your government will keep telling you the changes that have been made are here to stay) and to completely change your life doesn't take much in terms of reflecting on to see the huge discrepency between proprionate response and completely destroying the fabric of social reality for everyone around the world. The latter is the reality we are living with. The latter is ushering in a completely different way of life that nobody asked for, voted for, consented to.
And when you look at history, you can point to several significant events going back a fairly long way whereby a catastrophic event became the conduit for radical transformation in society, something that was authorized at the top of the chain while all those below simply had to follow suit. It's one of the best ways of forcing change on the masses while they are dealing with the event. It makes you wonder whether these catastophic events are connected to those who then radically alter your reality. Remember, we went to war in Afghanistan because there was a monumental event that occured. The war in Afghanistan was a long time in the pipeline before the terror attacks on 9/11. The US government had actually worked with Osama Bin Laden in order to prevent Russia from taking over before they double-crossed him. They paid him huge amounts of money, weaponry, ammunition, pretty much anything he wanted. And then they made him enemy number one, despite him being one of their closest allies in the middle east. The entire picture painted of the war on terror was a sham.
But, hey, life changed forever when we chose to go to war in the middle east. What came of it? Nothing. The WAPO released a several part report on the failings of the war in Afghanistan, complete with sources from within the US military and intelligence apparatus who admitted essentially the entire thing was a farce.
Life changed forever in 2020, with another narrative that is incredibly similiar to the war narratives we have all been used to. Another enemy, another sacrifice to our freedoms in order to beat them. All the while, when you actually dig deep, there isn't a war at all. The war though is being constantly played out in the collective consciousness because for a long time now people have been conditioned to do so. That I disagree with. That I think is completely unacceptable. But if we post pictures, that changes everything, right? That proves 100% the destruction ongoing around the world is justified? Nothing justifies this.
Again, I'm objective. Despite nothing being concretely proven, whatever exists is not what everyone is making it out to be. If it was, we'd be looking at 1918/19 all over again. More people died within one month in the US alone than what the US now has in total deaths for 9 months. The way a virus works implies it will not significantly get worse each and every wave. But this truth has been reversed so that every wave thereafter is worse than the one before, despite this going contrary to everything we know about how viruses work. And so, there will never be a pandemic like the real ones in the past. So that means it's not a pandemic. The WHO demoted the status of COVID-19 to an epidemic only a month or so after releasing their first emergency briefing. Here in the UK it was downgraded to epidemic shortly afterwards. The narrative and what is truth is completely different. This is why I'm objective. And why I welcome people challenging what is going on. The truth is being played out right in front of you. The narrative though? That's playing out like Hollywood movie and when you have much of the population putting reality down to Hollywood, you have a big issue on your hands.
Also just remember when the War of the Worlds was first released and played to people, people actually started ringing in believing there was an alien invasion. These social contagions are well documented by anthropologists, sociologists and in the field of psychology extensively. With sufficient exposure to a particular environment, people in their droves will begin to act, think and feel in certain ways, despite things being much different in reality. Look at the laughing contagions in the Medieval era. Look at the witch trials. It doesn't take much for people to change the script and start living in a fantasy miles apart from reality. What makes you think it's any different now? The answer is; it's not different at all. People are taking leaving of their senses/faculties and delving deep into this like it was a fantasy novel come true. The only difference is, it's not a fantasy novel and in their devolving from reality, the consequences are the radical transformation of reality for you, me and everyone else continues. While everyone is high and too involved to come down, huge changes are taking place on every level.
That has more to do with stopping the spread.
)
