Originally posted by AlphaNumeric
His (and my) point about you jumping to the incorrect conclusion about people who attend Cambridge are still perfectly valid are they not? You said we don't know what its like to work, purely because we go to Cambridge. You complain I make assumptions about you, yet you do the same about us.
Like being on that end of the attitude, don't you. 8) That was the first time I've done that, and I was returning the favor. You don't know me, and have not taken the time to. You started out right away with the attacks. I clammed up, because it's the smart thing to do. I sat here reading your posts, and saw all of the errors in your trains of thought on attacking me. I wanted to see who I was dealing with before I opened up to you. I see that you are intelligent, but not I don't think you are ready for me to open up to. Simply because of the attitude you displayed. BTW I get this shit everywhere, what makes you think you were the first to try to tell me I'm wrong, or full of shit. You are far from the first.
What exactly would you say to his tutor? That he thinks your theories aren't good? That he called you names? That he thinks your assumption that noone in Cambridge knows what its like to have a job was stupid and insulting? I doubt his tutor would even care he insulted someone on the internet.
LOL ok, thanks for taking it way too seriously. I wanted to know who he was, because he seems the most grounded, and the simple fact if he's American, makes it easier for me to get into a position of contacting him in person on this.
Have you not been saying such things for 12 months? A search for your posts in this forum will vindicate that.
Probably because I've been busy networking on the issues, don't jump in without getting wet first.
I offer evidence that some of your comments are not true, and you decide to all it "tripe". Did you read the link I posted that explains why 1/0 is not a number? Its irrelevant of Boolean algebra, its a fact about The Field of Reals. If you wish to call one of the must fundamental facts about numbers "tripe" then I don't think you can claim to have great insite into numbers.
What you offered isn't true. Maybe in the world of pure number theory it is, but in the rest of the world. Boolean logic dictates 1/0 is a valid operator, and thusly a valid number.
I've listed numerous errors with your mathematical comments. True, I could have worded them with slightly less emotion, but the underlying points are still relevant. If you've got any proof that 1/0 is a number, I'd like to see it.
No you haven't, and it's not my job to explain a boolean operator to you. That's something you should already understand. Blame your prof for not teaching you this, not me. Secondly blame yourself for not going out on your own to learn it.
I have nothing to do with the quality of your education here, it's all up to you to be motivated to go out, and see where the errors may lay, and if what they are teaching you is 100% accurate. I know, I do everyday, when I look at the glaring errors my prof in logic, and programming classes. I'm leaving the school because he has no idea what he is talking about most of the time, and I want someone with more experience, and a greater span of knowledge. Essentially I want someone that can answer any questions I throw at him. I'm not getting it where I'm at. The internet is where I go for most of my work, because programming is the most used topic on it. I've learned more on forums for programming than from my prof.
Expensive schools don't always mean better. I've met community college profs that knew more than my liberal studies school I'm going to now. This guy went to Berkeley for Comp Sci though.
) you'd have to explain your theory to him, and I imagine he'd give a similar (but politer) reply to us.
