Next Mexican admin: US legal marijuana vote changes 'rules of the game' in drug war

First came marijuana as medicine. Now comes legal pot for the people.

Those who have argued for decades that legalizing and taxing weed would be better than a costly, failed U.S. drug war have their chance to prove it, as Colorado and Washington became the first states to allow pot for recreational use.

While the measures earned support from broad swaths of the electorate in both states Tuesday, they are likely to face resistance from federal drug warriors. As of Wednesday, authorities did not say whether they would challenge the new laws.

Pot advocates say a fight is exactly what they want.

"I think we are at a tipping point on marijuana policy," said Brian Vicente, co-author of Colorado's marijuana measure. "We are going to see whether marijuana prohibition survives, or whether we should try a new and more sensible approach."

Soon after the measures passed, cheering people poured out of bars in Denver, the tangy scent of pot filling the air, and others in Seattle lit up in celebration.

Authorities in Colorado, however, urged caution. "Federal law still says marijuana is an illegal drug, so don't break out the Cheetos or Goldfish too quickly," said Democratic Gov. John Hickenlooper, who opposed the measure.

As the initial celebration dies down and the process to implement the laws progresses over the next year, other states and countries will be watching to see if the measures can both help reduce money going to drug cartels and raise it for governments.

Governments in Latin America where drugs are produced for the U.S. market were largely quiet about the measures, but the main adviser to Mexico's president-elect said the new laws will force the U.S. and his country to reassess how they fight cross-border pot smuggling.

Analysts said that there would likely be an impact on cartels in Mexico that send pot to the U.S., but differed on how soon and how much.

Both measures call for the drug to be heavily taxed, with the profits headed to state coffers. Colorado would devote the potential tax revenue first to school construction, while Washington's sends pot taxes to an array of health programs.

Estimates vary widely on how much they would raise. Colorado officials anticipate somewhere between $5 million and $22 million a year. Washington analysts estimated legal pot could produce nearly $2 billion over five years.

Both state estimates came with big caveats: The current illegal marijuana market is hard to gauge and any revenue would be contingent upon federal authorities allowing commercial pot sales in the first place, something that is very much still in question.

cont at
http://www.kotanow.com/story/20034908/pot-votes-in-2-states-challenge-us-drug-war
 
Overall, this is a good decision and step in the right direction. It is interesting to see how this may have an impact on foreign countries policies as well. Even if the goal was mainly to benefit the state economically, something like marijuana simply shouldn't be illegal. Maybe we this is the gateway to a better perception of psychoactive plants as a whole. I wonder whether this will continue once the states feel their financial needs have been satisfied.


The only potential flaw that I see with this is having the state-liquor control board be in charge of implementing the law. Or do you think this is beneficial.



Ody;11070454 said:
When people don't cite sources, it is because it is a statistic pulled out of their ass often.

Statistically, i wonder how often this is true?
 
rm-rf;11042392 said:
damn right. best weed in the usa is most likely grown pretty darn close to wherever you live.

Very true!! It is rare to get good Sativa in Alaska; Indica's are much easier to grow indoors. %)
 
Do we really want a major nation, that shares such a large border with us, to eventually fall into the hands of organized crime? The drug cartels have more money than the Mexican government. To disarm them, we must bankrupt them. Mexico should, for their own survival, legalize all drugs immediately. If the US wants them illegal, leave the onus on our government to continue this idiotic and fruitless "war on drugs". I, for one, am tired of paying for the anti-drug morality.
 
B
eventually? that's cute. of course drugs(and accompanying crime from what prohibition does to that type of thing) are heavily invovled in government do you know how big an industry it is to their economy? lol
 
With legal marijuana importation of marijuana through illicit channels will become less and less a route taken by those distributing marijuana. Once legitimate businesses are set up, there will be no need to import marijuana from other countries.
 
One of the harmful effects of doing drug, no doubt, or one of the negative consequences of doing it.

Something that is one thing they you can increase that is one thing that can separate your drug-use from others and make you different? Or it's one of the things about your perception is that is are one things that is are and more equally will with time damage your body (like giving you poorer, thinner hair and a more aged look).

Most doctors or almost all doctors won't have any problem spotting regular long-term users or reading your body language when it comes to it. They simply choose to ignore it or not consciously respond. Their attitude can also be very different.

Some will visibly resent it while others are compassionate about it. Depends a lot on if they really want to help or just see it as a job or carreer. Most denying the different effects of drugs are also in serious denial which hits you super-hard if you get in withdrawal.

When you're not addicted to anything it's not that hard.
 
B
not trying to be a dick, but... do you have any grasp how you come across when writing shit like that?
/srsly...wtf?
//edit: plz understand that, in threads on p&s where you speak of communicating w/ god and angels, ppl are much more generous than in other subforums.
///in some ways the site could benefit from more consistent guidelines, but that'd really only serve the outliers, not the ppl that benefit most, nor the general public.
 
Top