Juvenile
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2003
- Messages
- 644
Well if pipes are really that much cheaper to produce then I guess we are stuck with the shit for a while to come then. ![Mad :X :X](https://bluelight.org/xf/BL_Images/Orig_Emoji/mad.gif)
However, I don't see how reducing the worldwide amount of pipes that are legally available could not have some effect on the amount turning up in ecstasy. Another trouble with pipes is that being legal in some countries, they do not face any problems crossing borders as compared to MDMA (and its precursors). If pipes were controlled the same as MDMA, surely crime syndicates would move MDMA instead as it has a bigger market, even more so as people start to wise up to pipes?
PS I can read, I know the article is about the Britain.
btw trippa, you are often defending piperazine on here. Why for? I don't care if other people enjoy it, I just don't want to end up wasting money on it when I should have been getting MDMA.
![Mad :X :X](https://bluelight.org/xf/BL_Images/Orig_Emoji/mad.gif)
However, I don't see how reducing the worldwide amount of pipes that are legally available could not have some effect on the amount turning up in ecstasy. Another trouble with pipes is that being legal in some countries, they do not face any problems crossing borders as compared to MDMA (and its precursors). If pipes were controlled the same as MDMA, surely crime syndicates would move MDMA instead as it has a bigger market, even more so as people start to wise up to pipes?
PS I can read, I know the article is about the Britain.
btw trippa, you are often defending piperazine on here. Why for? I don't care if other people enjoy it, I just don't want to end up wasting money on it when I should have been getting MDMA.