• Philosophy and Spirituality
    Welcome Guest
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Threads of Note Socialize
  • P&S Moderators: JackARoe | Cheshire_Kat

New world order

aspiration, inspiration, as-in in the ass. when does expiration come in, or was it in all along?
 
Expiration happens to the best of us. Perhaps the true utopia...ahhh oohhh whoooo

those are my deeper meaning exhalations. I'm pregnant with ultimate truth.

Anyway PiP's enigmatical wackiness strikes a resonant chord. I was wondering if he was either really high all the time, just goofy, or a member of this elite organization in France that trains a person to talk in riddles and educates them in vast esotera, or some combination of the three. I want cool training, maybe that's my problem....
 
Last edited:
so.... what's new about it, then?

Nothing really.. we'll just be more enslaved than we were before and the chance of us ever escaping it will have been reduced dramatically, the language construct will be tighter than before, and we will individually be far more vunerable to the decisions of those right at the top.. who can now delete our existence from the comfort of their mountain side Italian villa.
 
someone said it earlier, "new world order" is really just describing a major shift in political policy and balance of power. The conspiracy surrounding the term goes in a lot of directions but I think most prevalent is that of the secret elite conspiring together to rule the world by means of a globalized world government.
The NWO is basically a plot that originated within the nexus of power which is centered around Europe, primarily Rome and London. Power shifted from Egypt to Greece and then to Rome, and in the present day is in and around Europe. The Vatican is at the centre of it all along with the hidden families of Venetian origin (and others) that pull financial strings and sit on absolutely insane amounts of wealth. Forget Rothschild, Rockefeller, the corporations etc.. look up the Queen and the British monarchy, the Pilgrim Society, the Knights of Malta, the Jesuits (!), and Vatican history.




All they want is more power. That's what this is about. When rich people have nothing to do and are mentally retarded from poor emotional upbrining all they seek is power and more power.
Winston Churchill for example described the shift in political thinking post WW1/2 as a new world order. However its not without motive as it was the perfect time to bring global issues to the table, which lead of course to the creation of the U.N and NATO. Other examples of opportunistic times for change came during the red-scare, which people thought would turn sour and provoke world communism.

but like you said, SS, many believed the implementation of the U.N was a vehicle for international bankers to conspire their way to power, with a little help from the Rothschilds, who's family estabolished Euopean banking near the end of the 1700's. Some members of the Rothschilds rose to Austrian and British nobility. Some members of the were accused of belonging to the Illuminati.

Rockafeller is interesting tho, aside from them funding a laundry lists of important often government purpose building projects, they have their hand in major aspects of world/international business affairs.

It is plausible that the right combination of figure heads, be it money, political power, religious influence etc, could very well instigate a major shift in world government.

Vatican history is plain creepy, that city may as well be its own planet. I think Vatican City is the only one that operates under canon law, where the entire judicial system is run by the church courts. I find the lure of the Swiss gueard pretty interesting also.

The knights of malta is a good one also, they were more i guess you could say protectors of christianity, wher at their height of importance during the seige of malta. Popular belief was that if the Turks were successful in taking the island it was likely france, spain, italy would fall under turkish invasion and more importantly Christendom.

All these examples ultimately describe major shifts in wide-spread power, getting back to how i would define a new world order
 
Nothing really.. we'll just be more enslaved than we were before and the chance of us ever escaping it will have been reduced dramatically, the language construct will be tighter than before, and we will individually be far more vunerable to the decisions of those right at the top.. who can now delete our existence from the comfort of their mountain side Italian villa.

sorry bro, but you're living in a cucu-clock.
 
sorry bro, but you're living in a cucu-clock.
and you're living in a fantasy world, bro. If you think i'm wrong i suggest you go and spend some time looking into the forefront of military technology in the 21st century; specifically nano-tech, bio-tech, AI and super computing, but also just where we are in terms of computer/satellite/communications technology.

There are no real enemies in the 21st century.. the only real enemy is YOU against the Establishment. The idea of pitting one nation against another is no longer a viable method of tyranny/business so those in control are moving straight ahead to the final solution. If you think Nazi Germany couldn't happen again you are gravely mistaken. I don't think you or most people realize just how close we are to a nightmare scenario right now.. the IBM deathcamp machine will look embarresing compared to what is just around the corner. The fact they are trying desperately to censor/shut down the internet should be a reminder to you that there is a cabal who run the show. You need to get real my friend.. quaint denials will not suffice when the hammer comes down.

George Carlin - Education/Who Owns You
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4jQT7_rVxAE
 
Either we are in controls of our lives or we aren't, but either way there doesn't seem to be anything to worry about. If there are no enemies then the only enemy is the same thing which was always the enemy. A new world order is more than anyone can hope for. I don't know that for a fact, but I imagine even if the entire world was on lock-down there'd still be signs of resistance and chaotic happenings that no one can control. All it takes would be a place that can't be nuked, so any centralizing power would be hoisted by its own petard. Gotta love Medieval references. Feudalism was decently democratic, if you consider that the farmers needed protection and the kings needed farms, it's not really all that different from capitalism.
 
George Carlin - Education/Who Owns You
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4jQT7_rVxAE

+1 "the american dream: you have to be asleep to believe it" - g.c.

This isn't anything new. I've heard about this for most of my life. It was the definition of progress and the 'future' growing up. However seeing it performed and actualized is a bit different. It's no different than history though. Contemporary society is the sum of all the past's sweeping achievements. Future generations probably won't question the context of their living conditions either. We accept what is presented and adapt to it in the name of survival.

the farmers needed protection and the kings needed farms,.

Flash. Burst. Insight. +1
 
Last edited:
Looking into "darpa" I quite like some of their ideas. Mapping brainwaves produced by words could be a promising field of study and a giant leap forward in cryptography. Technology will always progress, and maybe Nietzsche was correct regarding humanity's progress as our inevitable demise, or perhaps not. One thing's certain - humans need to spread life to other planets and the distant stars, and maybe even go along for the ride. That is the ultimate goal and technology may lead us there if we do not use it to destroy ourselves.
 
Top