new senate bill will create organization to evaluate drug policies

trainwreckmolly

Bluelighter
Joined
Sep 15, 2008
Messages
4,890
Location
Virginia Beach
Finally, Some Change We Can Believe In
April 1st, 2009
By: Paul Armentano
http://blog.norml.org/2009/04/01/finally-some-change-we-can-believe-in/

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Not all federal politicians believe that marijuana law reform is a laughing matter.

Congressmen Jim Webb (D-VA) and Arlen Specter (R-PA), along with fifteen co-sponsors, have introduced legislation in Congress to critically evaluate America’s drugs and prisons policies.

Senate Bill 714, the National Criminal Justice Commission Act of 2009 seeks to establish a blue-ribbon commission to “undertake a comprehensive review of the criminal justice system; make findings related to current Federal and State criminal justice policies and practices; and make reform recommendations for the President, Congress, and State governments to improve public safety, cost-effectiveness, overall prison administration, and fairness in the implementation of the Nation’s criminal justice system.”

Specifically, the Commission will examine “current drug policy and its impact on incarceration, crime and violence, sentencing, and reentry programs, [including] an analysis of the general availability of drugs in our society, the impact and effectiveness of current policies on reducing that availability and on the incidence of crime, and in the case of criminal offenders, the availability of drug treatment programs before, during, and after incarceration.”

Writing this past weekend in Parade Magazine, Sen. Webb stated:

America’s criminal justice system has deteriorated to the point that it is a national disgrace. … The United States has by far the world’s highest incarceration rate. With 5% of the world’s population, our country now houses nearly 25% of the world’s reported prisoners.

… Drug offenders, most of them passive users or minor dealers, are swamping our prisons. … Justice statistics also show that 47.5% of all the drug arrests in our country in 2007 were for marijuana offenses. Additionally, nearly 60% of the people in state prisons serving time for a drug offense had no history of violence or of any significant selling activity. … African-Americans — who make up about 12% of the total U.S. population population — accounted for 37% of those arrested on drug charges, 59% of those convicted, and 74% of all drug offenders sentenced to prison.

… It is incumbent on our national leadership to find a way to fix our prison system. I believe that American ingenuity can discover better ways to deal with the problems of drugs and nonviolent criminal behavior while still minimizing violent crime and large-scale gang activity. And we all deserve to live in a country made better by such changes.”

Senator Webb’s analysis is accurate and his advocacy is politically courageous. It’s been many years since any federally appointed commission has taken an objective look at American criminal justice policies, and it’s been nearly 40 years since federal lawmakers have undertaken a critical examination of US marijuana policy.

Webb’s stance is all the more admirable as it comes just days after President Barack Obama and White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs found themselves unable to even utter the word ‘marijuana’ without laughing, no less engage in a critical assessment of America’s failed pot policies.

Writing in Salon.com, best-selling author and commentator Glen Greenwald assesses the situation and nails it:

For a Senator like Webb to spend his time trumpeting the evils of excessive prison rates, racial disparities in sentencing, the unjust effects of the Drug War, and disgustingly harsh conditions inside prisons is precisely the opposite of what every single political consultant would recommend that he do.

There’s just no plausible explanation for Webb’s actions other than the fact that he’s engaged in the noblest and rarest of conduct: advocating a position and pursuing an outcome because he actually believes in it and believes that, with reasoned argument, he can convince his fellow citizens to see the validity of his cause.

And he is doing this despite the fact that it potentially poses substantial risks to his political self-interest and offers almost no prospect for political reward. Webb is far from perfect … but, in this instance, not only his conduct but also his motives are highly commendable.

At long last, some ‘change’ in Washington, DC that we can believe in!
 
Good post! I almost posted the Parade article, but this will do. I wish them luck in passing this, as it will force Obama to listen to science and reason as he said he would.
 
Has anyone else noticed a major increase in articles about legalization? Not even just medical marijuana legalization, or decriminalization, but real legalization.
 
Yes I have Hamm, I was just thinking about this a couple days ago. A change in drug policy might come sooner than I thought (in my lifetime).
 
Hopefully this wont be like the British fiasco last year and they will actually listen...doubt it though.
 
I was really excited about this when I first read the article, but the more I think about it, the more I realize that no one will likely listen to what they have to say.
 
Obama is a baffoon. The mainstream media are controlled by a few elite who push their own agendas. They influence public opinion to advance their various causes. So judging by the flurry of articles since the election, it appears the war on drugs will be scaled back. They need to free up a lot of prison space. I foresee harmless drug users being released to make room for a new class of political prisoners. Isn't that what communist governments do? They lock up and silence the opposition.
 
Huaca-

What is with the extreme paranoia about Obama that is so widespread among the right, what has he done that makes you think he will take 'political prisoners.' And has he done anything that even comes remotely close to the destruction of rights that was so common by the Bush Administration and the republican congress (ie patriot act, warrantless wiretapping, secret prisons and suspension of habeas corpus).

These crazy fears that are constantly echoed on Fox news are poisoning the political environment through fear-mongering and are completely unfounded.

If you dislike Obama and his policies that is fine, but he is not some evil manchurian canidate striving to turn the country into a dictatorship.

And about the article- I am hopefull that they will see what is wrong with the drug war and bring that to light and influence a change in policy. But I also think that even if they do come out against the drug war they may just be ignored and criticized for it as happened in the UK.
 
Last edited:
^ The US Constitution does not allow for a socialist, communist, or authoritarian government. I don't read Fox News, they are too liberal. I am not liberal or conservative. I would consider myself libertarian. I believe in personal freedom, personal responsibility, and small government truly limited by the Constitution. I won't try to convince you or argue with you, but if you do your own research outside the mainstream media you might realize who is destroying America. Peace.
http://www.wnd.com/
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/CFP-RSS
http://loyaltoliberty.com/
http://www.newmediajournal.us/
http://www.campaignforliberty.com/
http://www.ronpaul.com/
 
I'm really hoping we're moving to a regulated system. If US does it, everyone will follow suit. Good luck to them. It just makes sense and Obama's response to the top question is just a laugh and no consideration for the possibilities. There's several really genuine people in the US Senate and Congress, unfortunately they're horribly outnumbered. But hey, they banned Hemp back in 1937, I'm sure they can go so irrational (in the irrational mind, see: rational) as to consider legalization given enough reasons and money savings/gains..
 
What? There's nothing in the US constitution that prohibits socialism. We've had a somewhat socialist state for at least the past 100 years.

It takes a pretty vague interpretation to suggest that social programs like Social Security are remotely unconstitutional.
 
Top