JohnBoy2000
Bluelighter
- Joined
- May 11, 2016
- Messages
- 2,377
Ionic flux in and out of neurons creates action potentials - effectively ionic shifts, the principle of electricity.
This would create electromagnetism, right?
Am I correct in saying this is the principle that MRI scans work upon?
The detect neural activity via ionic flux (the electromagnetism or "magnetic resonance" the neurons create)?
Is it a far gone hypothesis to consider that electromagnetic pulsation or waves via neural activity is what's creates someones "vibe"?
You know you can almost sense someones personality by their resonance?
Is it just me?
And one being aware of this is characterized as one being "intuitive" (accurately gauging someones "resonance", vs the external presentation, spoken words etc - which can be fabricate)
Neural activity clearly dictates mood to some level as drugs that affect this activity, they affect mood also.
And according to some, they affect personality (thus, resonance - all governed via neural activity).
Point I'm making is - the ultimate characterization of "emotions" thus far in neuroscientific literature seems to be quite ambiguous.
Emotion is (electro-magnetic) wave pulse (of thus far undetermined frequency) generated via neural activity (ionic shifts, de-polarization etc)?
Is this too "bro"-science?
This would create electromagnetism, right?
Am I correct in saying this is the principle that MRI scans work upon?
The detect neural activity via ionic flux (the electromagnetism or "magnetic resonance" the neurons create)?
Is it a far gone hypothesis to consider that electromagnetic pulsation or waves via neural activity is what's creates someones "vibe"?
You know you can almost sense someones personality by their resonance?
Is it just me?
And one being aware of this is characterized as one being "intuitive" (accurately gauging someones "resonance", vs the external presentation, spoken words etc - which can be fabricate)
Neural activity clearly dictates mood to some level as drugs that affect this activity, they affect mood also.
And according to some, they affect personality (thus, resonance - all governed via neural activity).
Point I'm making is - the ultimate characterization of "emotions" thus far in neuroscientific literature seems to be quite ambiguous.
Emotion is (electro-magnetic) wave pulse (of thus far undetermined frequency) generated via neural activity (ionic shifts, de-polarization etc)?
Is this too "bro"-science?
Last edited:
