• CD Moderators: someguyontheinternet
  • Cannabis Discussion Welcome Guest
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules

My boyfriend saved his puppies with marijuana

that's actually a bit of an urban legend. while there is some truth to it, dogs have to eat a shitload of really dark chocolate for it to really be dangerous.
 
OnlyAshRemains said:
Huh. Now my own comment has me curious. Has anyone else ever heard of the ear as an ROA for pets such as cats and dogs, and if so, is it a viable method?
Click to expand...

Think about it though, you blow smoke "in to" an animal's ear, it's right near their nose/mouth, meaning that they'll probably breathe it in and get stoned, even though you directed it in to the ear.
There's no mucosa in the ear canal so there's basically no way of the THC getting in to the animal's bloodstream via the ear.
 
n3ophy7e said:
Think about it though, you blow smoke "in to" an animal's ear, it's right near their nose/mouth, meaning that they'll probably breathe it in and get stoned, even though you directed it in to the ear.
There's no mucosa in the ear canal so there's basically no way of the THC getting in to the animal's bloodstream via the ear.
Click to expand...

This all makes sense, and I did think about what you're bringing up, I was mainly curious about any "science" that would back up or disprove this idea. I mean, I can use logic to come up with reasons why it wouldn't work just as well as reasons why it would. Eh, whatever, I'm not really that curious anymore anyway, seeing as how my dog doesn't like being high to begin with haha.
 
OnlyAshRemains -- Yes, I've always been instructed the proper way to get a cat stoned was to blow the smoke in their ear.

It seems to work and the cat objects less.

Tough to blow smoke in a cats ear but not its face though, if you know what I mean.

edit* Actually im trying to remember where this came from and I think I was told "Their ears connect to their lungs, not like a humans.....I was like 12 and said "oh OK"

Never thought about it too much till you asked, probably nonsense but it seems to work.
 
Last edited:
^^^^ not really...i think that dog should consider itself very lucky, to survive eating a human sized brownie...my friends dog actually ate a bit of chocolate and was killed, so yeah it doesnt take much.
 
cloud_nine said:
^^^^ not really...i think that dog should consider itself very lucky, to survive eating a human sized brownie...my friends dog actually ate a bit of chocolate and was killed, so yeah it doesnt take much.
Click to expand...

Yeah, it probably varies from species to species and dog to dog, and probably even chocolate to chocolate, but you shouldn't really be feeding pets much, if any "people" food anyway, so just keep dogs away from it, chocolate in particular!
 
OnlyAshRemains said:
Yeah, it probably varies from species to species and dog to dog, and probably even chocolate to chocolate, but you shouldn't really be feeding pets much, if any "people" food anyway, so just keep dogs away from it, chocolate in particular!
Click to expand...

You shouldn't feed any animals ANY human food whatsoever. Human food has far too many ingredients and preservatives that are at and beyond toxic levels for a pet to consume.

Dogs and cats can develop diabetes from long term exposure to eating human food. I used to have a diabetic dog that needed twice daily insulin injections.
 
Verybuffed said:
You shouldn't feed any animals ANY human food whatsoever. Human food has far too many ingredients and preservatives that are at and beyond toxic levels for a pet to consume.

Dogs and cats can develop diabetes from long term exposure to eating human food. I used to have a diabetic dog that needed twice daily insulin injections.
Click to expand...

QFT. Human food is indeed loaded with toxins, many of which shouldn't even be consumed by humans, in my opinion. That sucks about your diabetic dog man.
 
Ya obviously the dog shouldn't have had a brownie. Pot brownie or not. They are not supposed to eat grapes or onions fyi. It wasn't my dog or my brownie though but, regardless shit happens. I've never even had a dog that would steal shit from a table either so maybe proper training is the real issue.

The dog ate about 2 grams of haze in a brownie. It wasn't the crappy powdered chocolate. It was the MJ.

The point was she was obviously high. Acting weird. She was not laying down in pain like she would be from eating a ton of chocolate. A brownie is not enough chocolate. People act like 10 m&ms will kill a dog.

Anyways back on topic.... if there's one left.
 
Last edited:
smokeymcpot42088 said:
edit* Actually im trying to remember where this came from and I think I was told "Their ears connect to their lungs, not like a humans.....I was like 12 and said "oh OK"

Never thought about it too much till you asked, probably nonsense but it seems to work.
Click to expand...

I knew somebody who claimed it was possible to breath through your ears. I guess its possible.

The Eustachian tube (or auditory tube or pharyngotympanic tube) is a tube that links the pharynx to the middle ear. In adults the Eustachian tube is approximately 35 mm long.
Click to expand...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eustachian_tube

EDIT: Well Im not actually sure if its possible to use this opening to breath but the muscle regulating the opening of the tube can definitely be controlled.
 
Ok, So this does merit further research.

Is Blowing smoke in a cats ear (in small quantities) an efficient and painless method of catching felines a buzz?

That is the question, now everyone research it and give your answer along with a link to the source of your info.

Go!
 
I seem to have this gut feelings that getting your animals high is just...wrong.
Perhaps its that morality shit I have issues with.
 
Pillthrill said:
I seem to have this gut feelings that getting your animals high is just...wrong.
Perhaps its that morality shit I have issues with.
Click to expand...

It's wrong if a pet clearly doesn't like it. I got my dog high once, she didn't like it and now avoids the smell of weed. I haven't done it since. However, I know plenty of people with pets that clearly do enjoy being high, so why not let them catch a buzz?
 
OnlyAshRemains said:
Huh. Now my own comment has me curious. Has anyone else ever heard of the ear as an ROA for pets such as cats and dogs, and if so, is it a viable method? If it is, it would likely be a good way to sidestep the issue that was brought by psychomimetic.
Click to expand...

That's what I've always heard. Me and my roomate blow smoke into her puppy's ear all the time, haha. He seems to like it :)

n3ophy7e said:
Think about it though, you blow smoke "in to" an animal's ear, it's right near their nose/mouth, meaning that they'll probably breathe it in and get stoned, even though you directed it in to the ear.
.
Click to expand...

This is true too, good point.
 
stuckinaloop said:
Think about it, the dogs have NO idea whats going on, and all of a sudden they are tripping their fuckin asses off.
Click to expand...

...then, if they don't like it, they run off or otherwise let you know, and you never do it again. If they do like it, why is it so bad?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top