Cotcha Yankinov
Bluelight Crew
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2015
- Messages
- 2,952
Vent all you like, that's what the thread is for 
There is a lot of discussion in the mental health field about biological vs. psychological, or internally vs. externally caused mental illness (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endogenous_depression https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biopsychiatry_controversy)
First I should point out that an extraordinary number of people around the world end up developing MDD without any clear cause. But while I'm sure its reasonable to assert that we would never have found ourselves in quite this predicament or a similar one without some inciting event, be it an intensely traumatic event that lead to PTSD or whatever, whether or not the mental illness is from external factors, entirely genetic or some combination, these various therapies (cognitive and biological) should all be viewed as input -> output.
So even though severe MDD is regarded as intensely biological, with findings of various inflammation and differences in volumes of brain regions etc when it is longstanding, CBT can still be effective and it is widely considered the first line treatment because it really does affect your biology. If MDD pathology causes a shift towards activation of the self-referential/rumination circuits in some people, then cognitive based therapies can still be the input that helps them calm and normalize those networks.
"Where can a psychologist help here where so many symptoms seem to be mediated by the disturbance. For example there isnt any long term conditioning response to work on. What can they do to cure me? And if I followed a strict therapy regimen weekly can I expect to be cured in 6-8 weeks or is this setting myself up for disappointment?"
I know people around here talk a lot about wanting to be 100% recovered, but medical practitioners seem to always emphasize improving quality of life as much as possible, and that's what I would focus on as well. I've heard a lot of people concede that they would be happy with a guaranteed 50% recovery and that sort of thing. I think its going to be much more than 50% with enough time and proper navigation, but getting frustrated that you're not at 100% isn't helpful unfortunately :/
The other thing to consider as a main tenant of medicine is risk vs. benefit ratio. We can assess what the risk vs. benefit ratio of cognitive therapy is, but it would be pertinent to point out that the risk/negative effects of therapy would probably be mostly related to us getting frustrated if participating in the therapy didn't 100% cure us right away, but that sort of cognitive phenomenon is ironically what CBT would try to address.
I would read through that page on endogenous depression, see for example
"Endogenous depression occurs as the results of an internal stressor—commonly cognitive or biological—and not an external factor. Potential risk factors include these cognitive or biological factors. Patients with endogenous depression often are more likely to have a positive family history of disorders and fewer psychosocial and environmental factors that cause their symptoms
~ This type of depression often occurs due to biological reasons. Since symptoms are due to an internal phenomena, prevalence rates rend to be higher in older adults and more prevalent among women
Individuals suffering from endogenous depression require treatment plans that focus on the internal, cognitive thought processes since internal stressors are the root of somatic symptoms. Individual cognitive therapy (ICT) is therefore a common treatment used to gain insight to the individual's internal conflicts or thoughts that are motivating their distressing symptoms.[14]
Once the cause of the symptoms are identified, sessions are used to develop new coping skills, behavior modification, and changes in beliefs. As preventative measures, pharmaceuticals such as SSRI's and antidepressants may also be utilized to avoid further development or progression to Major Depressive Disorder"
Now I know what people are thinking, take a quote like "Individuals suffering from endogenous depression require treatment plans that focus on the internal, cognitive thought processes" - our first thought here might be "But it was the ecstasy" and so forth, but the thing to consider is that ecstasy, like all other drugs, functions by affecting our cognitive thought processes. So targeting the cognitive thought processes by whatever means necessary is still valid to improve our quality of life, and allow our recovery to take place.
And again keep in mind, this therapeutic target shouldn't be viewed as a 100% cure, but a therapeutic target to improve quality of life, and especially to decrease the chance that someone will develop other neurosis while they give the recovery time.

There is a lot of discussion in the mental health field about biological vs. psychological, or internally vs. externally caused mental illness (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endogenous_depression https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biopsychiatry_controversy)
First I should point out that an extraordinary number of people around the world end up developing MDD without any clear cause. But while I'm sure its reasonable to assert that we would never have found ourselves in quite this predicament or a similar one without some inciting event, be it an intensely traumatic event that lead to PTSD or whatever, whether or not the mental illness is from external factors, entirely genetic or some combination, these various therapies (cognitive and biological) should all be viewed as input -> output.
So even though severe MDD is regarded as intensely biological, with findings of various inflammation and differences in volumes of brain regions etc when it is longstanding, CBT can still be effective and it is widely considered the first line treatment because it really does affect your biology. If MDD pathology causes a shift towards activation of the self-referential/rumination circuits in some people, then cognitive based therapies can still be the input that helps them calm and normalize those networks.
"Where can a psychologist help here where so many symptoms seem to be mediated by the disturbance. For example there isnt any long term conditioning response to work on. What can they do to cure me? And if I followed a strict therapy regimen weekly can I expect to be cured in 6-8 weeks or is this setting myself up for disappointment?"
I know people around here talk a lot about wanting to be 100% recovered, but medical practitioners seem to always emphasize improving quality of life as much as possible, and that's what I would focus on as well. I've heard a lot of people concede that they would be happy with a guaranteed 50% recovery and that sort of thing. I think its going to be much more than 50% with enough time and proper navigation, but getting frustrated that you're not at 100% isn't helpful unfortunately :/
The other thing to consider as a main tenant of medicine is risk vs. benefit ratio. We can assess what the risk vs. benefit ratio of cognitive therapy is, but it would be pertinent to point out that the risk/negative effects of therapy would probably be mostly related to us getting frustrated if participating in the therapy didn't 100% cure us right away, but that sort of cognitive phenomenon is ironically what CBT would try to address.
I would read through that page on endogenous depression, see for example
"Endogenous depression occurs as the results of an internal stressor—commonly cognitive or biological—and not an external factor. Potential risk factors include these cognitive or biological factors. Patients with endogenous depression often are more likely to have a positive family history of disorders and fewer psychosocial and environmental factors that cause their symptoms
~ This type of depression often occurs due to biological reasons. Since symptoms are due to an internal phenomena, prevalence rates rend to be higher in older adults and more prevalent among women
Individuals suffering from endogenous depression require treatment plans that focus on the internal, cognitive thought processes since internal stressors are the root of somatic symptoms. Individual cognitive therapy (ICT) is therefore a common treatment used to gain insight to the individual's internal conflicts or thoughts that are motivating their distressing symptoms.[14]
Once the cause of the symptoms are identified, sessions are used to develop new coping skills, behavior modification, and changes in beliefs. As preventative measures, pharmaceuticals such as SSRI's and antidepressants may also be utilized to avoid further development or progression to Major Depressive Disorder"
Now I know what people are thinking, take a quote like "Individuals suffering from endogenous depression require treatment plans that focus on the internal, cognitive thought processes" - our first thought here might be "But it was the ecstasy" and so forth, but the thing to consider is that ecstasy, like all other drugs, functions by affecting our cognitive thought processes. So targeting the cognitive thought processes by whatever means necessary is still valid to improve our quality of life, and allow our recovery to take place.
And again keep in mind, this therapeutic target shouldn't be viewed as a 100% cure, but a therapeutic target to improve quality of life, and especially to decrease the chance that someone will develop other neurosis while they give the recovery time.