Cowboy Mac
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2000
- Messages
- 3,084
I won't reiterate old posts regarding discussion on various storage methods (a search will yield many threads), but in summary it is believed that the best way to store LSD is to minimize its exposure to light, heat, and oxygen.
The following from what I can gather the optimal storage procedure when considering the constraints. An experiment has commenced where tabs have been vacuumed sealed (to prevent oxygen exposure) and stored in a freezer (to prevent exposure to heat and light). An added benefit of vacuum sealing is that it will prevent condensation from forming within the plastic packaging. Results will be posted over time to determine if the tabs remain as potent after set time periods qualified by anecdotal experience.
We all know that LSD degrades over time, and herein lies my question. If you had known quantities of LSD and exposed it to varying conditions to degrade then quantified it by GC/MS, would the better stored LSD have a higher microgram count? (ie. less micrograms of LSD were destroyed?) What is happening on a chemical level when degradation occurs?
The following from what I can gather the optimal storage procedure when considering the constraints. An experiment has commenced where tabs have been vacuumed sealed (to prevent oxygen exposure) and stored in a freezer (to prevent exposure to heat and light). An added benefit of vacuum sealing is that it will prevent condensation from forming within the plastic packaging. Results will be posted over time to determine if the tabs remain as potent after set time periods qualified by anecdotal experience.
We all know that LSD degrades over time, and herein lies my question. If you had known quantities of LSD and exposed it to varying conditions to degrade then quantified it by GC/MS, would the better stored LSD have a higher microgram count? (ie. less micrograms of LSD were destroyed?) What is happening on a chemical level when degradation occurs?