I gotta call you out on this one: Normal people just don't take 70g of GHB. You post states this figure, which I believe to be an enormously exaggerated dose.
Well i got that from a medical report i read ages ago, i will have to try and find it.. But yes, this is an exception to the rule obviously..
But even 10-15G is 10 to 15 times the dose you should be having... And with any drug, if you have ten to fifteen times the amount your ment to.. Your in for trouble.
Another thought.. You guys said that if you pass out on g, you've had to much.. Well i tend to agree, but wasn't it used legally and successfully as a sleep aid for many many years (30 odd)???
Found this looking about and thought it was interesting....
Although GHB traditionally has been considered a potent epileptogenic drug and has been noted to cause epileptiform EEGs in animals, a few human volunteer studies have failed to demonstrate EEG changes associated with use. However, case reports commonly report seizures or seizurelike activity in persons ingesting the drug. It is theorized that myoclonic jerks of the face and extremities may be mistaken for evidence of seizures.
http://emedicine.com/emerg/topic848.htm
and some more stuff..
One particularly fascinating property of GHB is its ability to prevent cell damage. Several studies have shown a reduction in oxygen requirements and a subsequent reduction in hypoxic cell damage. The exact mechanism of this tissue protective effect is unknown; however, several effects have been noted, including reductions in lipid peroxidation, lipolysis, free radical production, and a dampening of the inflammatory response. GHB also has been shown to be protective in radiation exposure.
The reduction in free radical production may be of some gain since free radicals are the reason behind neurological damage from Mdma.
And as far as toxicity goes.. i found this on
http://leda.lycaeum.org/Documents/GHB_FAQ.10208.shtml
For the thirty years prior to 1990, the scientific papers on GHB were unanimous in reporting numerous beneficial physiological effects and the absence of long-term negative effects. In 1964, Laborit listed "very low toxicity" as one of the "principle elements" of the compound's pharmacology. In a 1969 report on GHB's anesthetic uses, Vickers referred to GHB as "a truly nontoxic hypnotic" and repeatedly emphasized its "lack of toxicity." Vickers cited evidence that GHB demonstrates "no toxic effects on the liver and kidney." In 1972, Laborit described the body's metabolism of GHB and stressed "the absence of any need of detoxification by the organism." As recently as 1989, this scientific consensus on GHB's benign nature remained unchanged.
And I want to point out, that in my opinion, it is still a drug to be very carefull with, mainly because it is now sold illicitly and you can never no the actual dosage you are taking.
Chem
[ 20 February 2002: Message edited by: ChEmIcaL_NiGhT ]