• Trip Reports Moderator: M!$ter-ED

less than 44mg IM MET (where DMT equals MMT) experience.

Helios.

Ex-Bluelighter
Joined
May 25, 2006
Messages
1,843
Location
not there yet
This is a true story as in a collection of facts strung here together that since they are true they need not be proven and indeed cannot be proven or disproved. Also please believe me causality is an issue you will see time after time which is best left to the unseen not the imaginary or real depending on your perspective and intention 3D plane whose favorite question why? is not to be explained.

Eternal inscrutable type with ego equals zero accurately measures 44mg MET freebase and dissolves in sterile isotonic aqueous solution. At least some of the powder is in suspension afterwards as particulate matter. Two shots were self administered after unnamed decides he is high enough. Another demonstration of the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics is that less 44mg were delivered and he wasn't even trying his best.

Conclusion: Agreeing with Dondante's erowid advice, MET smoke is too harsh for his liking and the stuff simply burns, numbs, and tastes too bad to be tasted or snorted. IM is the way to go. The overall spirit of MET he now thinks to be a certain other person entity he knows and who knows him as well since eternity. MET is a non-compressible fluid like water feeling that like most typtamines makes test subject's corporeal body feel uneasy in a not at home kind of watery place but MET is real as in the Spanish royal as in not illusion just like him and me and beyond time. Subject's pupils were pitch black and near maximally dilated as they had been for the past no quantifiable 6-day long lasting no sleep period which had preceded and continued concomitantly with this event, the reason behind which stems from a recent chemical invention of the crystal type in any event.

The MET feeling was one that he had always known and feels like a good
re-listening of MTV's Nirvana Unplugged does to him down to the bone. But unlike all good amphetamines out of the oridinary euphoria was found to lacking, visuals and color enhancement were real and quick to arrive and tyrptamine like but MET is nothing like MMT (DMT) from what it is said and is also neither as sinister extreme hilarious or insight enhancing as LSD. It reminded him most of MDMA without the euphoric energy or the stinky licorice smell.

Dose for dose, MET is a little known timeless 19 Prince of Heaven type with little euphoria, but damnit if I didn't look good in that pin striped French blue shirt staring in the mirror with pupils blacker than can be imagined whilst calmly explaining that this dapper material who knows more about what is real than most all of the others including who's really who is even for me a hard thing to figure out as to what was being asked of its existence in the first place.

Overall, I like MET and find him very worthwhile, a gem or jewel even, but who like me cannot be forced to make any kind of sense to the outside, I now even better see why he often feels despondent and though clearly valuable not directly applicable, a good and real answer to a question that even the two of us don't remember what it was yet.
 
great report. 1st one I read of an IM injection of MET.
I got a little lost and confused reading your report.
I have been wanting to try MET, and IM is the way i would try it.
 
Yes, thanks a lot for the report.

Once I get over my fear of IM (I'm not about to IV an obsecure psychedelic!), I shall try MET in this manner, and post a report.
 
You got a very NanoBrainish writing style, So im gonna ask you, How where the CEVs and Auditory effects with it? I found 40mg smoked to be less than expected, but it tastes like shit and its very hard to get that much smoke in my lungs!

Great to hear something on MET, Now if we could just get Morninggloryseed to take the shit
 
Jamshyd said:
Yes, thanks a lot for the report.

Once I get over my fear of IM (I'm not about to IV an obsecure psychedelic!), I shall try MET in this manner, and post a report.
Me too. I will be able to as soon as I decide it's time to stick a needle in myself. Never been against it in any way, I just don't really feel like doing it. I like things going in my lungs and up my nose fine enough.. =D
 
U must b skitzo or sumthing, I've seen this crazy nonsense writing style on blulight b4. Picking thru the jibberish was fun but it's hard to take it seriosly as i lack this insane quality
 
toxide said:
U must b skitzo or sumthing, I've seen this crazy nonsense writing style on blulight b4. Picking thru the jibberish was fun but it's hard to take it seriosly as i lack this insane quality

I, personally, love it! :)

Who are you to call him schizo?
 
Great report, Helios. I thoroughly enjoyed your personification of an obscure tryptamine, and after reading through twice (as you really are difficult to understand the first time through), it contains a lot of valuable information.

I'll be trying this one sometime as well, although I don't know when as currently I'm taking a sobriety break. Although that becomes difficult when I read about experiences I have not yet had. I need to remember that I've got all the time in the world to trip, and I don't need to do it all NOW.
 
I’ve been waiting for this report for a long time. While I appreciate your contribution, I’m skeptical that a fairly short post containing the first report of the IM administration--consider by consensus to be the best route--of an obscure, high-potential psychedelic is the best testing ground for experimental writing and seeming literary obscurantism (these things are better for augmenting and supplementing a clear core description in my opinion). Please consider distilling a few of the facts and posting them in the B&D MET thread. Would you say 40-50mg IM is a “full” dose? Do you think the particulate matter you wrote of was undissolved MET or an impurity (it would seem in any case that the freebase dissolves in saline solution right?)? Also, I find it strange that you compare MET to MDMA but also claim it has very little euphoria. I find MDMA’s psychedelic aspects pretty paltry compared to the more pure psychedelics. Do you care to elaborate? In some cases you seem to be commending it quite highly (“knows more about what’s real than most”), but then in others you make it sound like a second-rate material (the LSD comparison). Please give more information. MET intramuscularly “should” be great, but I’m still not sure whether it really belongs along side LSD, DMT, 4-AcO-DMT, mescaline, 2C-E, or DPT yet.
 
Jamshyd said:
Yes, thanks a lot for the report.

Once I get over my fear of IM (I'm not about to IV an obsecure psychedelic!), I shall try MET in this manner, and post a report.

so you will IV but you won't IM? afraid of abscesses? if you filter the solution with a micron filter you should be just fine. DPT, 2C-E, 2C-I, and a myriad of other chemicals have been injected into many different muscles in my body over the years and i have yet to get an abscess. i have to chalk it up to good preperation of the shot and not just luck, since luck's success rate is roughly 33% on a good day.

now to Psilo, are you afraid of needles or are you like me and don't mind a doctor giving you a shot, but the second someone says it's in the vein you freak out and would rather have someone shoot you in the head? it was this fear of getting blood taken that caused me to not IM anything for a very long time and then i just finaly drew up some DPT and stuck the insulin needle in my arm...to my suprise there was almost no pain at all. it hurt less than having my cat scratch me. just fight the fear and remember that it's a very tiny needle and much larger things have most likely pierced your skin for far less valuble reasons. ;)
 
Helios. said:
... Subject's pupils were pitch black and near maximally dilated as they had been for the past no quantifiable 6-day long lasting no sleep period which had preceded and continued concomitantly with this event, the reason behind which stems from a recent chemical invention of the crystal type in any event.


Am I reading this right? You took the MET after a 6 day period without sleep (due to stimulant use, as alluded)?

If so, I find this report somewhat lacking in usefulness as an objective description of what MET would be like on it's own. The title should probably be MET + sleep deprivation + meth (or whatever it is you are alluding to).
 
PrinceJarek7in said:
Sorry for being the newby, but what is "MET",??

MET is a homologue that lies between DMT and DET. DMT has an N,N-dimethylamine (one carbon each for a total of two), DET has an N,N-diethylamine (two carbons each for a total of four), and thus MET has an N-methyl-N-ethylamine (one carbon, and two carbons for a total of three) on the tail.
 

Attachments

  • MET_and_friends.jpg
    MET_and_friends.jpg
    23.8 KB · Views: 60
Top