• 🇬🇧󠁿 🇸🇪 🇿🇦 🇮🇪 🇬🇭 🇩🇪 🇪🇺
    European & African
    Drug Discussion


    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • EADD Moderators: Shambles

'Legal high' trade faces government review watch channel 4 news at 7pm

foolsgold

Bluelighter
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Messages
12,898
Location
about finished with this world
The government is to review the trade of "legal highs" in a bid to clamp down the soaring numbers of new and potentially fatal drugs.

Ten new psychoactive substances, also known as "legal highs" were identified last year for the first time in the UK by a specialist government system that targets music festivals and tobacco shops.

A total of 27 have now been detected by the Home Office's Forensic Early Warning System since it was set up in January 2011.

Official figures also show that the number of deaths being linked to legal highs soared by 80 per cent last year to 52, from 29 in 2011.

The review will look at how the UK's laws and enforcement against new legal highs can be improved.

Crime prevention minister Norman Baker said: "The coalition government is determined to clamp down on the reckless trade in so-called legal highs, which has tragically already claimed the lives of far too many young people in our country.

"Despite being marketed as legal alternatives to banned drugs, users cannot be sure of what they contain and the impact they will have on their health. Nor can they even be sure that they are legal.

'Fatal consequences'
The move comes as the government announces that two new groups of substances - NBOMe and Benzofury - will become classified as Class A and B drugs respectively.

Martin Barnes, chief executive of DrugScope, a charity supporting professionals working in drug and alcohol treatment, said: "It has been clear for some time that the law has been unable to keep pace with the chemistry when it comes to the production and supply of new drugs.

"As DrugScope's recent Street Drug Trends Survey highlighted, in some areas so-called 'legal highs' are not only being sold online and in 'headshops', but in outlets such as newsagents, petrol stations and take-away food shops.

"This is an attempt by the Home Office to bolster current enforcement efforts and to see what other legislative options could be brought to bear on this new and complex drug situation.

But the Shadow crime and security minister Diana Johnson said the government has taken too long to act.

She said: "The Home Secretary came into office promising 'swift action' on legal highs. Three years later she is launching a review.

"In the meantime hundreds of substances have come on to the UK market and thousands of sellers have opened up.

"While the government have failed to act, hundreds of thousands of young people have been trying these drugs, and sadly this has often had fatal consequences."

The review will be led by the Home Office, with input from experts in law enforcement, science, health and academia and will present its findings in spring 2014.
 
A few posts & links have appeared over in The Media about this, & I've seen a facebook feed or two today. I cannot see any new legislation going our way, but we can hope...
 
Oh no! This means I actually have to watch The News. Nooooooooooo

I hope the experts aren't going to scare monger
 
That Martin Barnes arsehole gets right on my breasticles.

Owen Jones was front page in the Independent this morning saying legalise cannabis - the independent spent years demanding cannabis be downgraded, then that urban myth about "skunk" came out and then they started clamouring for it to be put back to class B. Fucking tagnuts.
 
Im surprrised they havent already been blanket banned. although maybe the sale rate tax to mortality and hospitalization rate must make it worth the governments while still being on legal and on sale. either that or the gov didnt really give much of a shit before until the media starts banging on
 
Just seen it on ch 4 they had prof nutt in there. He was basically saying that if it were not for the government making relatively safe drugs like cannabis and even ecstasy illegal there would not be all these chemists making all these dangerous chemicals. Has a point tho, its just a vicious circle and banning these drugs will do absolutely nothing
 
They will probably just introduce a law similar to the US where pretty much all analogues are banned by default, no need to amend the law for specific substances. The trade will probably still go on though, just move to somewhere in europe.
 
No, what they need to ban is any drug, device or technique intended for getting high. And then make specific exemptions for tobacco, alcohol and whoever else is funding the political parties.

backed by hard data showing those dont do damage to health or society.
 
The actual article was terrible. But the resulting discussion with the mother and David Nutt was really good. Great to have their viewpoints sent out to everyone watching the Channel 4 News. The girl's mother is bang on the ball.

http://www.channel4.com/news/catch-up/display/playlistref/121213


What have you linked to? It's not about ketamine :? (although I just realised this thread is not about ketamine either! so well done for getting us back on topic) And David Nutt is nowhere to be seen.

Ah here we go:

http://www.channel4.com/news/catch-up/display/playlistref/121213/clipid/121213_4ON_highs_12

it's about legal highs.

Great interview! I've taken the liberty of editing your post to save people some time.
 
Last edited:
Albion: Just doing my bit! No need to roll your eyes :D

FUBAR: We've got a ketamine thread, I will move the posts there. Not to worry, I won't be putting you on detention ;)
 
Top