prosandcons
Bluelighter
bluelotus
PureLife said:prolly something stupid like ephedrine and 5htp.
frizzantik said:we're so interested in preventing harm we won't tell users what the drug is 8)
Sim0n said:I would hope and expect that this information would be provided along with the actual drug.
What exactly constitues "safe"? MDMA is much safer than alcohol when used responsibly.... and is being trialed only as a safer alternative for people who might otherwise use street ecstasy.
Why replace a drug with only "a few" deaths caused by this drug? Why not find an alternative for alcohol which cause much more than a few deaths.Stargate International Founder, Matt Bowden, said since a member of his family was one of the few New Zealanders to die as a result of taking ecstasy, that he was committed to developing safer, legal alternatives to prevent further drug-related deaths.
And studies on MDMA don't agree on it's neurotoxic effect either.Mr Bowden said “Ecstasy has a number of neuro-toxic properties which can damage the brain, however animal studies suggest that Ease does not share the mechanism by which brain damage and addictive effects are thought to be produced, so Ease should have considerably less potential for harm than ecstasy.”
(emphasis added by me).I've tried Ease too (like Mr Fisher, purely for purposes of journalistic inquiry): it's really pretty good; like ecstasy without the rushes and wonky eyes, but with a similar sense of well-being and sociability. And I got up the next morning and did a full day's work. It seems much less noxious than the piperazine-based pills currently widely available, so there would be a certain irony in it not being eventually declared legal. On the other hand, Matt Bowden may well be right in saying that it lacks the neurotoxic effects of ecstasy, but I would like to know exactly what it is sooner rather than later.
starboy said:Hi!
Just found this thread - going to tie up some unanswered questions.
THE "HARD NEWS" REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
The same day Russell Brown posted that he wanted to know sooner rather than later, I contacted him and gave him full disclosure on it as part of a commitment to public transparency. He writes about it here: http://publicaddress.net/default,3066.sm#post3066
I found it difficult to find the right balance between keeping something out of the public arena to stop people with no product knowledge selling it by the gram in corner stores to children and drug naive individuals (as happened in NZ with BZP) and keeping it totally secret. Kiwis, you saw what happened with BZP when we wrote the ingredients on the label and it got copied and mass marketed. Should I have made the same mistake again?
Always open to constructive criticism on how to do it better next time.