https://www.vox.com/policy-and-poli...vanaugh-christine-blasey-ford-washington-post
This seems even a bit more aggressive or abusive than any of the 17 Trump assault victims.
Rateyourrapist.com
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-poli...vanaugh-christine-blasey-ford-washington-post
This seems even a bit more aggressive or abusive than any of the 17 Trump assault victims.
of course it's a commentary on the current situation but you're adding 2 and 2 to get 5.
alasdair
Ridiculous argument. 2-10% of rape accusations are fake. Therefore Kavanaugh is guilty. Therefore this transparent attempt at sabatoging his nomination is true.
Let me break that down logically.
2-10% of rape accusations are fake.
-Ok sure, I will grant this although I haven't seen all the statistics. I don't have any reason to doubt this.
After this the logic breaks down. This statement does not make the following true.
"Therefore Kavanaugh is guilty."
When you look at the situation as a whole it is even less of an argument.
A SINGLE case, not statistical averages.
"I'm sorry, but there's absolutely nothing credible about Christine Blasey Ford's allegations against Judge Kavanaugh.
SHE COULDN?T EVEN REMEMBER WHEN EXACTLY IT HAPPENED.
She's refusing to testify.
She's connected to Democrats in every direction.
This is a political hit job."
"Nobody has hurt real victims of sexual abuse more than Democrats.
When Democrats "believe all accusations," that makes such accusations a political tool.
Then people ignore accusations because they assume it's a political tool.
Who does that hurt? Real victims of real abuse."
Juanita Broaddrick said:If you want to go back that far Hillary Clinton/MSNBC to investigate Ford's allegations... let's investigate my RAPE allegations against Bill Clinton, too. Seems only fair
So the Democrat position is: "We demand she be heard. How dare you ask her to talk!"
TheGatewayPundit said:Senator Feinstein admitted on Tuesday that she ?can?t say that everything is truthful? about the sexual assault allegations against Kavanaugh brought forth by far-left activist Christine Ford.
CharlieKirk said:Hey Professor Ford, if you really wanted an FBI investigation into this alleged incident why didn't you mention this ONCE in the last 35 years?
Patricia Dickson said:Can someone explain how the FBI can "investigate" an alleged assault when the accuser can't even name the date & location that it happened? Where exactly would they begin?
Ryan Fournier said:Every woman's allegations should be heard. Unless she was raped by Bill Clinton or Keith Ellison
I was in elementary & I remember everything.
when you have to exaggerate like this what does it say about your point?"We must believe women! No questions allowed!"
(Proceed to form lynch mob)
Jim Crow south:
"We must believe women! No questions
allowed!"
(Proceed to form lynch mob)
when you have to exaggerate like this what does it say about your point?
who's saying no questions allowed?
alasdair
Everyone processes sexual abuse differently; it is inappropriate to blame the victim for not having all the answers.
If two to ten percent of rape allegations are fake, then by using basic statistics this woman is most likely telling the truth.
Sure OJ might be innocent, but his wife still died. She can't say who did it, she's dead.
This victim's talking, however, and we should believe what she's saying.
He's a supreme court nom., there's no guarantee he would go out his way to roll back Roe v. Wade, etc. She stands to gain next to nothing by preventing a creep from getting into the supreme court.
qft
it's sick that we don't believe women when they are victims of crime. That's got to stop.
I'm not saying it HAD to have happened, there's always a chance she is lying but if you ask me SLIM TO NONE, and I do sincerely believe her.
no one ever wants to admit to being the victim of sexual abuse. The experience is degrading, humiliating, and depressing enough to go through without outing yourself to the entire world that this happened to you. I don't blame victims for trying to suppress what happened to them. It's a natural instinct so you can try to keep the same life you had/could have before/after the abuse. People don't want to make being a victim part of their identity. No one is proud they were sexually abused.
What I hate about Kavanaugh is his belief in expanding the power of the executive branch. To me, that screams "I will vote in support of a dictatorship". He has expressed such opinions on a few occasions, a few too many imo. There's no place in the American judiciary system for people who don't believe in checks and balances. The founding fathers would be rolling in their graves at the very thought of such a man being appointed to the supreme court.*shrug*
I dunno if this is actually a stunt to delay and discredit obviously but if the problem is his stance on abortion, then it's a hell of a way to get rid of him.
Creamy gravy said:Also Zeph, you said you're a victim of rape. I'm sorry to hear that. I'm surprised that you're not more upset/distraught over it tbh. Most people who are victims of such abuse do not share your positive outlook on the experience.
MSNBC?s Mika Brzezinski flipped the script on Wednesday morning and ripped Democrats for using ?impossible tactics? against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.
During a segment on MSNBC?s ?Morning Joe,? Brzezinski slammed Senate Democrats for continuing to move the goal post ?in an impossible direction,? and said Republicans should ?demand a vote? on Kavanaugh?s confirmation.
?Nobody wants to be on the wrong side of this. So everyone said let her speak, let her testify. Give her a moment to have her voice. Let?s hear her story. I think she even said she would testify,? Brzezinski said.
Brzezinski, certainly no ally to the GOP or President Donald Trump, went on to say there?s nothing they can do other than hold a vote on Kavanaugh and let the record reflect where each senator stands.
?I guess some could argue, and some Republicans could argue, this is moving the goal post and it?s moving the goal post in an impossible direction. There are statutes of limitations for a reason. So we need to hear from her. That?s why everybody is open to hearing from a woman.?
?But if she doesn?t want to speak, if she doesn?t want to testify, you have to wonder what the Republicans are supposed to do except demand a vote. This is something that happened in high school. This is going to need her voice. There?s no other way around it. No one can do it for her.?
Is it OK to fabricate accusations because you disagree with someone's assumed future political decisions? (aka by any means necessary)
Should women like this (if she's making it up) be sent to jail for making false rape accusations?
Alana Mastrangelo said:If all you've got on Brett Kavanaugh is an accusation from when he was 17-years-old, and his accuser is an anti-Trump activist who won't go under oath and 'can't remember' when, where, or how anything happened, then Kavanaugh is pretty damn clean.
No, it isn't okay. And if false accusations could be proven false, then yes, a mild amount of jail time may be acceptable.Is it OK to fabricate accusations because you disagree with someone's assumed future political decisions? (aka by any means necessary)