• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: deficiT | tryptakid | Foreigner

Israel is under attack

Status
Not open for further replies.
yea that's the problem-- terrorist groups completely depend on using our own weapons to kill us.

I mean besides, knives, machetes, cars, trucks, pipe bombs, other IEDs, Boeing 767s, etc....

Don't forget sticks and stones - those savages! Boeing being a Catholic American Company. I think we should lay some blame at their feet in all of this.

It's the weapons that are the problem, not the ideology.

yeah that makes sense.
I wonder how much of the Billions of dollars in weapons we sent to Iran between 1980-2015 were used to fund Hamas - since the funding of Hamas is what started my line of thinking.
 
I wonder how much of the Billions of dollars in weapons we sent to Iran between 1980-2015 were used to fund Hamas - since the funding of Hamas is what started my line of thinking.

that's a good question to ponder

I think the more pertinent dilemma though is why we continue to tolerate religious fundamentalism
 
Yeah, I believe what Im told and thats why Im telling you what the news told me? 🤣 I can see pretty objectively this whole conflict and as an intelligent person use multipse ways to get my information, 5% of which is news
You're bi and supporting people who want you dead.
 
You're bi and supporting people who want you dead.
aka you see this situation black and white. Im not bi, interestingly enough :D and if it aligns with my beliefs why cant I support people who want me dead? Are you so black n white that you think I think hamas should win this? Theres no universe where that even happens. This is clearly just a cleaning of palestinans.

Im tired of the unbelievably stupidity on this argument and the sad to see person over 20+, o sorry 30+ so fukin black n white :bear:
 
that's a good question to ponder

I think the more pertinent dilemma though is why we continue to tolerate religious fundamentalism
"Many of the British North American colonies that eventually formed the United States of America were settled in the seventeenth century by men and women, who, in the face of European persecution, refused to compromise passionately held religious convictions and fled Europe."

Wasn't our country kind of built on religious tolerance?
 
Last edited:
"Many of the British North American colonies that eventually formed the United States of America were settled in the seventeenth century by men and women, who, in the face of European persecution, refused to compromise passionately held religious convictions and fled Europe."

Wasn't our country kind of build on religious tolerance?

Did you see the part where I said religious fundamentalism not religion itself?
 
The terrorists are underground in the tunnels likely surviving. One of the most sophisticated tunnel systems in the world. The people on the surface are largely civilians.
wow...

1. annihilate the surface
2. wait until people on surface join people on tunnels on some terms regarding killing people who annihilate the surface
3. annihilate the surface more because there are more people on tunnels

I know this is not possibly most accurate and wide description of what happens and it is open for counter-arguments but that truly resembles "mad-making" manipulation. Sets questionable how much zionist people of Israel are trying to "protect themselves" when they are doing what they are doing.

Also for other points I have pointed out, I shall continue playing my most small violin (I have most small violin) for zionists, who obviously can't do anything but annihilate the surface; :violin:

(what the fuck, it is actually pretty big)

e: Israel changed to zionists in last chapter. This is tragedy to Israel, after all. It is surprisingly hard to take into account the whole picture all the time and verbalize it in second language.
 
Last edited:
Who are we - a country established by persons with passionately held religious convictions - to not be tolerant of the religious whether fundamentalists or otherwise?

we are a secular nation and our religious population is diminishing. Doesn't matter who we were established by over two centuries ago. If Islam had modernized itself to the degree that Christianity has since the days of our founders, we wouldn't even be having this conversation.
 
we are a secular nation and our religious population is diminishing. Doesn't matter who we were established by over two centuries ago. If Islam had modernized itself to the degree that Christianity has since the days of our founders, we wouldn't even be having this conversation.
I guess the issue is/becomes - who are we to decide what is a valid form of worship/idealogy. Trust me I prefer the 1970's Iran / Afghanistan to the 2020's versions but it's not just a small percentage of people that want to live that way.

Are we to just exterminate them? Can it even be done? Haven't we tried eradicating groups like al-qaeda only to drive them further underground only to resurface years later with more hatred and ammo on their hands?
 
Are we to just exterminate them? Can it even be done? Haven't we tried eradicating groups like al-qaeda only to drive them further underground only to resurface years later with more hatred and ammo on their hands?
this makes me think that while I can totally agree with military action against some entities, how important and difficult is to find the right ratio of putting funds on that versus things like education as way to prevent bad radicalization. If you could does not mean you always had to.
 
We probably could've won against Al Qaeda but that war was just a scam. Pretty sure they hate Julian Assange because he exposed it as a giant money laundering scheme and to win was never the goal
 
NBC mad

Tweets about the Israel-Hamas war from these accounts outperformed popular news accounts belonging to CNN, The New York Times, the BBC and Reuters, despite having far fewer followers, according to the research (NBC News was not included). Across the research period, tweets about the Israel-Hamas war from well-followed traditional news sources garnered 112 million views over 298 tweets, while tweets from the seven newly influential accounts drew 1.6 billion views across 1,834 tweets.

 
NBC mad



Researchers wrote that the volume of the tweets combined with a dearth of sourcing or context created “the sense of a constant stream of decontextualized anger and violence.”
Which is different from msm how? lol
 
Laughed my ass off serves this prick right


My biggest criticism of of Islam is the blatant use of the word "God" while committing gruesome violence.

Other religions do this as well, but moreso retroactively as moral justification, or thanking God for not letting it happen to them while they do it onto others.

Radical Muslims praise Allah while committing the act. It's beyond terrible.

God does not instruct wanton violence. It's disgusting.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top