• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: deficiT | tryptakid | Foreigner

Israel is under attack

Status
Not open for further replies.
If Isreal stopped fighting and signed a permanent ceasefire, you know what'd happen??? Nothing. If Hamas just stopped fighting you know what would happen? All Palestinians would die.

Leonardo Dicaprio Lol GIF
 
That's a great argument. I never saw it that way. You've changed my view.

Yeah well I tried facts, charts, reason, and logic for 5 hours. Let's be real, you aren't changing your view. You just want to make a bunch of half assed arguments and get away with it as I'm sure you're used to.

I would never resort to a Leo laughing gif if what you said wasn't absolutely the most ignorant statement that has ever been uttered in this thread. Stunning.
 
Yeah well I tried facts, charts, reason, and logic for 5 hours. Let's be real, you aren't changing your view. You just want to make a bunch of half assed arguments and get away with it as I'm sure you're used to.

I would never resort to a Leo laughing gif if what you said wasn't absolutely the most ignorant statement that has ever been uttered in this thread. Stunning.
The thing is we're on both sides of the same coin. You're just as stubborn as me. You'll never accept that both are in the wrong. If you slap somebody in the face and they punch you, dont expect an apology. But really, why is that wrong? The ceasefire would end (or would have ended, back when there were negotiations, but it's just been heating up past a point of repair these last few months) the war and they would get their hostages back. If Hamas attacked them again, they have more than enough weapons to surround the entire state at this point. Also, I'm not asking for nor expecting a ceasefire, it would be better than the war though, can we at least agree on that?
E: supporting that all Palestinians would die if Gaza were to stop fighting
 
Last edited:
The thing is we're on both sides of the same coin. You're just as stubborn as me. You'll never accept that both are in the wrong. If y slap somebody in the face and they punch you, dont expect an apology. But really, why is that wrong? The ceasefire would end (or would have ended, back when there were negotiations, but it's just been heating up past a point of repair these last few months) the war and they would get their hostages back. If Hamas attacked them again, they have more than enough weapons to surround the entire state at this point. Also, I'm not asking for nor expecting a ceasefire, it would be better than the war though, can we at least agree on that?
E: supporting that all Palestinians would die if Gaza were to stop fighting

You don't seem to be aware that the US Secretary of State has been working tirelessly for days to get Hamas to agree to an agreement that is currently on the table. It has been approved by the Israeli government, the UN Security Council, the G7, and other Arab and gulf states.

THE ONLY group preventing a ceasefire at this point is Hamas..
 
He talked about it and around it but didn't explain it because it's really not suited for words...
 
You don't seem to be aware that the US Secretary of State has been working tirelessly for days to get Hamas to agree to an agreement that is currently on the table. It has been approved by the Israeli government, the UN Security Council, the G7, and other Arab and gulf states.

THE ONLY group preventing a ceasefire at this point is Hamas..
You mean because Hamas wants a timeline for the agreement? Israel and the US were saying that Hamas modified the agreement when they just wanted a timeline that Israel will commit to
 
you think that map shows the "Arab homeland" ?

epic straw man btw! Noice.
No. Whoever has lived in that land, that's their homeland, and the graphic had labeled them as Arabs. You're kind of twisting my words, as that's not even a quote I used, those two words together.
And damn man you really get pissed about jokes huh. That's also funny for somebody who will pick and chose one line that he thinks looks stupid rather than addressing the arguments made.
 
You mean because Hamas wants a timeline for the agreement? Israel and the US were saying that Hamas modified the agreement when they just wanted a timeline that Israel will commit to

It's good enough for literally everyone else, including the UN. Time for Hamas to suck it up.
 
So Israel can just go back to bombing the second they have hostages back? No, actually, it isn't good enough. Asking for a timeline is incredibly reasonable.

If you went to buy a car and agreed on a price for a car you wanted, but the dealer refused to commit to a date when the car would be delivered. Would you agree to the deal?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top