Audio Terrorist
Bluelighter
- Joined
- May 16, 2007
- Messages
- 335
My understanding from reading that, is that there is some belief that people specifically from China that consume more salt have higher blood pressure.
I quote "residents living in the cold northern and northwestern areas of mainland China consume significantly more sodium than people from the south, that the average blood pressure and prevalence of hypertension are higher in the high-salt-consuming populationresidents living in the cold northern and northwestern areas of mainland China consume significantly more sodium than people from the south, that the average blood pressure and prevalence of hypertension are higher in the high-salt-consuming population"
This doesn't take into account any other differences in lifestyle. Do these people have exactly the same lifestyle and diets as people in other parts of the country other than salt intake? I personally don't believe that to be true.
I also quote "In the same period, due to improved living standards, the occurrence of overweight or obesity in adults has increased significantly, which might contribute to the elevated prevalence of hypertension"
This would suggest to me that salt intake has little to do with blood pressure and other factors have a much larger impact on someone's blood pressure, especially obesity in this particular case although I suspect other factors may be involved.
I believe the researchers in this case have given salt more credit than it is due in it's part in causing high blood pressure. Of course the findings are open to interpretation, that is just how I see it.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/...nel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum
I do have to agree that this does seem to point towards a link between high blood pressure and salt intake. Although the researchers have only used subjects that already have resistant hypertension thus not really answering my question of the link between the 2 in healthy individuals.
Thank you for the links though. The second link's research does seem to show a link between certain individuals although this isn't something I really doubted. I'm more interested in it's effect on healthy people in general.
The fact is, humans are meant to run mainly on carbohydrates, with some fat and protein in the backround(roughly 65%,18%,17% respectively). This is an evolutionary fact. But the modern human diet consists of mainly fats and sugars, with protein and carbs bringing in the rear.
I was simply saying that some toxic minerals build up in the body and when these antinutrients begin to increase you must therefore increase levels of nutrients to stay healthy.
But fatty food tastes so fucking good doesn't it?! :D
If we grew out oun crops and raised our oen livestock(like our ancestors did), food poisioing would not really be an issue and you could eat practically every meal raw.


MyDoorsAreOpen said:*WHOLE POST*
I'm inclined to believe this post from what I have read. Unless anyone can point to anything convincing. I still believe that it is an old way of thinking that for some reason has just caught on.
I do understand that people already with a condition need to limit their salt intake but the same could be said about Diabetic patients and sugar. Healthy people shouldn't cut out/reduce sugar intake quite as drastically as someone suffering from diabetes as long as they have a healthy pancreas and don't stuff their face with sugary foods indulgently there is no real need to avoid the occasional chocolate bar or glass of fruit juice.