An a priori dialectic co-substantiates manifestation. Therefore, 'upward' would not exist without 'downward', and dimension is the tertium quid of their synthesis, again, a priori (not empirically, but absolutely) 'hot' would not exist without 'cold', and their binding constitution is temperature.
It's a silly question, because as Protagoras said "man is the measure of all things", existence itself is the human logos and nothing can exist beyond that. Anything we pose to possibly exist beyond that is a conditionate of the human logos itself.
Anyone who says its a bunk philosophy bases "reality" on an abstraction which negates itself due to the fact that it is itself their thought and therefore not the reality beyond thought they claim with their own thought, non plus ultra, to exist.
A question: If thinking is the active mental process by which its antithesis, the static product of knowing, is to be achieved; it must also be known we have only what is known to put thoughts toward. Whether we consider it from senses pre-established or not; it doesn't exist beyond the horizon of our own thinking. How is this unless we only know what we think?
All things that exist by their very nature are orderly; for one thing to be contingent and follow the rules of its contingencies are the only way it is grounded in fact for us. So everything needs an opposite to co-substantiate its existence as manifest; act & fact, subject & object.
For example, when dreaming, every dream we have is disordered in relative nature to our waking state; giving us the false sense that what we perceive in our mind while asleep is false but contained solely within ourselves; well this opposing & grounding idea of "relative" disorder is needed for our perception of an orderly universe while waking. Waking reality is no less contained solely in ourselves even while objects of consciousness seem to outrun our precepts; they are simply cognate to an organized rule of being more comprehensive and understandable.
Furthermore, identifying as this would being with the human logos; it ultimately sees neither as dual, or rather, it is the unity of unity & duality, rather than simply the duality of unity & duality (duality simply considered). For therefore, as logos, being is ultimately unity because we are the source wherein all multiplicity converges as an intelligible whole, and we are the sole constant of that whole which defines itself through the extension of duality and this makes it extant. It becomes reflexive to our ability to understand object, even ourselves as an objective empirical ego among others that we would again only know in relation to our own (Kantian) transcendental ego (which is subject, and not ourselves as object like the empirical ego: for an object is only object as thought, and subject is the act of thinking not yet objectified; creating as an object the horizon of time or delineation of events as objects & spacial realities).
A spectrum wherein mind creates the brain as an analogy to its every function; but a seamless syllogism; every faculty of thinking subjectivity has its dialectical objective instance; it is our mind that creates our brain and not the other way around; we are always inside our mind, no matter how perfectly analogous ones effect on the other seems, it starts in mind, even past events are contemporaneous in the present to our mind. Because it is part of the waking reality, it is perfectly bound to laws & structure by which we define all things as meaningful: and therefore the brain contains to us the objective value of the mind, which is the brain's subject, being as it is necessary for the other's existence in the same way that motion is inconceivable without matter.
Motion comes first, for otherwise matter cannot be differentiated and is quite simply nothing. In fact matter is literally nothingness until it is differentiated by motion; but matter is the post-differentiated temporal object also. The ideation of dialectic which is outside of time is the nonrelative subject, the 'pure act' of the scholastics, and the motion never in potency to any object.