HeavilySedated
Bluelighter
I read interesting article on NYTimes:
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/26/opinion/sunday/26shyness.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1&ref=general&src=me
Basically it makes a few arguments:
1. Introversion is not favored in our society, and introverted people are looked down upon.
2. Introversion is not a mental illness akin to social anxiety, but rather an individual's preference to be by themselves.
3. Introversion is an important survival instinct which prevents impulsive action that can be applied to the benefit of the human society.
I think I agree with those points. I don't really see myself as introvert, but many times I do enjoy being completely isolated. However, introversion on all its forms is an obstacle to succeeding in most environments.
So, is introversion something to be fixed? Should the world finally accept those who do not wish to be part of the herd?
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/26/opinion/sunday/26shyness.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1&ref=general&src=me
Basically it makes a few arguments:
1. Introversion is not favored in our society, and introverted people are looked down upon.
2. Introversion is not a mental illness akin to social anxiety, but rather an individual's preference to be by themselves.
3. Introversion is an important survival instinct which prevents impulsive action that can be applied to the benefit of the human society.
I think I agree with those points. I don't really see myself as introvert, but many times I do enjoy being completely isolated. However, introversion on all its forms is an obstacle to succeeding in most environments.
So, is introversion something to be fixed? Should the world finally accept those who do not wish to be part of the herd?