max_freakout
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2005
- Messages
- 560
You're stating something absurd as irrefutable fact,and refusing to provide any proof other than "read an entire book.
There is no such thing as an "irrefutable fact", and the concept of fact/fiction truth/falsity etc arent really relevant to a discussion about different interpretations of religion.
Several posters have asked about "evidence" for entheogen use in religion, so i have provided ample evidence in the form of published scholarship from entheogen scholars like Shanon and Hoffman. It is up to you if you want to look at the evidence or not, or how much of it you want to look at (a whole book, or part of a book, or whatever).
When I actually found quotes from one of the authors you claimed proved your points, it was counter to your claims.
I never claimed that any authors "prove my points", so it is incorrect to say that you provided any quotes from any of the authors that are "counter to my claims". The author you quoted from provides substantial evidence for entheogen use in religious history in his writing.
However if you want to see some writing that does argue against entheogen use in religion, Letcher's book is a good example that has been mentioned several times in this thread already, and i have outlined my reactions to Letcher.
Last edited: