Sturnam
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2008
- Messages
- 738
It only has 4 bonds...
Double bonds count as 2.
N&PD Moderators: Skorpio | someguyontheinternet
It only has 4 bonds...
maybe instead of this N, put an O inside the ring: (with the only argument that many substitutions on 3 and 4 start with O anyway)
![]()
the ring is not completely flat, but looks closer to benzene than MPA's tiophene-ring:
![]()
I have wondered about the pyrone analogues of amphetamine myself (as they are planar).
...In £D it looks slightly...
Location: Under your bed, masturbating...
^ Looks to be a little less soluble than midazolam itself (ClogP: 3.66 vs. 3.42 so it should still be water soluble), but that centre nitrogen has too many bonds! Taking a second look I realized that you just rotated those double bonds in the imidazole ring.
How about this amphetamine analogue.
In £D it looks slightly non-planar compared to conventional amphetamines but considerinf the reputation of beta methoxy amphetamines (eg: phenmetrazine) and some of the reported apreciations of 2' substituted amphetamines. I thought this was a good analogue. I called it Furanamine.
![]()
What do you think?
^anyone know of any drug compounds with a pyran ring?[/IMG]
(BTW i meant 3D by £D, lil typo)