How apps are revolutionising music

poledriver

Bluelighter
Joined
Jul 21, 2005
Messages
11,543
How apps are revolutionising music

"Strange days indeed, most peculiar, mama.'' Apply those words to the way millions of people are now creating music, and they are more relevant today than when John Lennon wrote them shortly before he was murdered 33 years ago.
For example, imagine the Beatles' surprise, as they grappled with antiquated tube mixers and a four-track tape recorder at Abbey Road, if someone had whipped out an iPhone and offered a modern recording studio with 167 tracks and full digital quality.

A gifted musician is always going to come through - doesn't matter what they're using, whether they're banging on a stick or a rock or using the most advanced mobile technology. If you are a Mozart, you're going to come through

Not only 167 tracks, but the ability to play back 64 simultaneously using an 85-key polyphonic keyboard, some 65 instruments, plus 60 more as add-ons, a microphone input for vocals, MIDI export and import, and a plethora of effects - and that's not even the half of it.

Not so reckless: James Reyne prefers making music with an acoustic guitar to iPad-based apps.
Music Studio for iPhone or iPad, by Austrian developer Xewton, comes with a 55-page manual and sells for $15.99.

A host of other mobile apps like it, ranging from complex to simple, have burst on to the market and they're not only revolutionising the way music is made, but also challenging the very definition of music itself.

For instance, if you croak horrible discordant noises into your iPhone and the sound is converted into harmonic and rhythmic elements with full instrumentation, as apps such as LaDiDa will do for $2.99, the end result might sound great - but is it real music?

music-studio-300x0.jpg

Music Studio.

Kalle Paulsson, product manager for Propellerhead, a leading app developer in Sweden, says that in response to a changing market, his company has just withdrawn from sale its complex music app Rebirth and started again from scratch.
The result is a much simpler app named Figure, so simple that a tone-deaf six-year-old could make music using one finger on an iPhone screen by choosing from different loops of drums, bass and guitar, and changing keys, beats and patterns.

Propellerhead has sold 500,000 of the apps at $1 each, but Paulsson still worries if he made the right decision.
''We would have had at least three times as many downloads by now if we had made them free of charge,'' he says.

''That's the gamble, I guess. If you make it free and more people download it, you can potentially make more money by selling add-ons. Although Figure is really great to use, there are quite a few restrictions, so people will still want to buy extra features.''

Jump a world away - in both distance and technology - and you'll find Melbourne singer-songwriter James Reyne at home, where he wrote his latest highly acclaimed album, Thirteen, using nothing but an acoustic guitar and piano.
He admits he wouldn't recognise a mobile music app if it jumped out of a tree and screamed at him.

''I don't use any developments in technology,'' he says. ''I'm not against them, it's just that I'm an idiot and I don't know how to use any of them.

''Still, there have been massive and significant changes in the way people create music. You can do it literally in your bedroom, and people can make what used to cost $100,000 for just a few dollars.
''I saw a friend of mine only two weeks ago sitting on an aeroplane, wearing headphones and mixing his latest album during the flight.''
Reyne believes the older generation of successful music-makers is not threatened by the latest mobile wizardry.

''You're only limited by your imagination, and you can soon tell the men from the boys in any area of music,'' he says. ''A gifted musician is always going to come through - doesn't matter what they're using, whether they're banging on a stick or a rock or using the most advanced mobile technology. If you are a Mozart, you're going to come through.''

Another Melbourne musician, Brett Goldsmith, is much less resistant to using music apps. He has his own recording studio, has produced records for Olivia Newton-John and has successfully released his own album, Ordinary Life.
''Having had a good look at what you can do in terms of recording if you only had an iPhone or iPad, there seems to be some really good things out there,'' Goldsmith says. ''I think I might put myself to the challenge and do it myself.

''A lot of people use these apps like DJs. They layer one pre-recorded track on to another, add traditional studio effects like flanging or chorus or echo, then upload their masterpiece on to SoundCloud and share it with the world.
''Another group is more interested in getting an organ sound, a piano sound, a drumbeat or a keyboard-based guitar and then maybe singing on top of it, but they're not actually players themselves. They can plug a MIDI keyboard into an iPhone and source every sound sample in the world to tinker around with.''

Goldsmith says vocals or real piano sounds can be recorded at a high-level bandwidth using a microphone into an iPhone and then mixing them across 24 tracks. ''You probably could make a professional record, if put to the test,'' he says.
''Hypothetically, it would sound as good as the studio I'm sitting in now, but the real challenge would be the extra time and difficulty involved in playing a keyboard and mixing tracks on a small screen like an iPhone's, or even on an iPad.''

Livewire took up the challenge and did its own test by downloading the Music Studio app on to an iPad and asking two musically talented 16-year-olds, who were completely unfamiliar with the software, to see how quickly they could create their own song.

They did so without even consulting the manual, and the surprising and entertaining results can be seen on the video above.

■ propellerheads.se
■ LaDiDa at khu.sh
■ soundcloud.com

With the video at -

http://www.smh.com.au/digital-life/...ising-music-20130626-2ovto.html#ixzz2XOkwzS8n
 
iPads are becoming the way of the future with music software. Portability is unmatched, hardware is already there and in the hands of musicians. It's not always a replacement for an actual studio but Native Instruments has been doing stuff with the iPad and a piece of hardware that was prohibitively expensive and used by the likes of Daft Punk is now an iOS app.

http://liine.net/en/products/lemur/

:D
 
There is a lot of cool tech out there but for some reason I just can't get use to touch screens no matter how much i use them. I thought I would grow accustomed to them but here we are 4 years after my first touch device and nope.
 
i am reminded of this:
roliepolie said:
I didn't spend the last 6 years of my life learning how to mix records, so that some 15 year old kid can come and take over the world with his fucking laptop and a pirated copy of Ableton...
one of my favourite bl quotes of all time :)

alasdair
 
I don't really see how apps are "revolutionising" music. I mean, how much music today is truly innovative? And the technical possibilities nowadays are more abundant than ever before.

When talking about innovative electronic music, I like to give Boards Of Canada as an example. They truly made some pieces of music that were something new and no one could ever do it like they've done it, yet they are rather known for using vintage analog gear (eg Korg Trident), or even Guitars, as on their second last album.

I mean yeah, it became a lot easier for someone to get into making electronic music, which is of course a good thing, but another effect of this is that thousand people make one redundant track after another. More possibilites may be an advantage, but in my opinion, cutting it back a bit forces you to be more creative.
 
Traktor DJ looks cool and with the Z1 I'm sure as a portable mini-setup it works really well.

BUT

Ipad apps are toys. Any serious musician will tell you the same.

A gifted musician is always going to come through - doesn't matter what they're using, whether they're banging on a stick or a rock or using the most advanced mobile technology. If you are a Mozart, you're going to come through

Maybe before the record industry went thru the crapper. There's so much music out there now and its so easy to get started that even if you are "gifted" beyond making classical music you really have a snowball's chance in hell of getting noticed. Sure, the prodigy idea still holds true in Jazz and Classical and more traditional band music, like if you are the next Steve Vai you'll be big in Japan or something.

For EDM as a producer as long as you can put out professional quality tracks it doesn't matter if you are genius or some stoner living in his Mom's basement or a socially reclusive nerd. Hell, as DJ you pay people to produce tracks for you, or hire an engineer to make tracks with - its more a cult of celebrity thing than talent. The playing field is a lot more level with EDM. The idea of this Mozart character doesn't play out, I think maybe Liam Howlett was one of the few guys in the industry who could lay claim to that title. You look at guys like Deadmaus and Skrillex, yeah they move units, but fuck it must suck to be them. And they have zero talent compared to Aphex Twin, Chemical Brothers, Daft Punk.

"The music business is a cruel and shallow money trench, a long plastic hallway where thieves and pimps run free, and good men die like dogs. There's also a negative side." - Hunter S. Thompson
 
^what is this "EDM" anyway? In my opinion this is just a marketing gag for the mass commercialization of electronic music during the last 2 years or so. When I started getting into techno music, about 5 years ago, nobody has ever heard of this term before. And tbh, all I associate with "EDM" is shit music from the likes of Steve Aoki, Skrillex, Avicii, you name it.

btw, here's a fucking banging track from 2012 and there sure as hell were no Ipad apps involved:
 
I don't think I would ever use the term EDM either. You can't really call it electronic music, because then ambient isn't dance music, and dance music seems to imply 90s pop music like C+C Music Factory, Technotronic. Electronic Dance Music? Sure, I'd talk about specific genres as opposed to some umbrella term.

ooo, I see - EDM has come to mean artists that are mainstream now, like you could talk to some girl about Aoki and she would know who he was.
 
^what is this "EDM" anyway? In my opinion this is just a marketing gag for the mass commercialization of electronic music during the last 2 years or so. When I started getting into techno music, about 5 years ago, nobody has ever heard of this term before. And tbh, all I associate with "EDM" is shit music from the likes of Steve Aoki, Skrillex, Avicii, you name it.

btw, here's a fucking banging track from 2012 and there sure as hell were no Ipad apps involved:


I've been hearing people say EDM for 10+ years now, at raves before anywhere else actually. There will always be blanket terminology for a genre of music. In the late 90's it was all called "electronica" in the mid 90's it was all called "dance music" before then it was all "techno".

Why you ask? Because 90% of the population of this earth does not give a fuck about music enough to have to study sub genre's or put any effort above purchasing a CD or MP3 from a top 50 list or what their friends recommend. I’ve actually found it quite helpful when explaining my musical tastes to people. A simple “I like EDM” either receives a negative or positive response. If it’s the latter then I know not to waste any more time explaining anything, if it’s the former then I can get more in depth. Rather than having to constantly fucking explain what trance, jungle, drum and bass etc is every single time just to get an “ohhh that’s like a style of EDM right?”

Really though, who can blame them. It would be like you and me talking about what to eat for lunch and i start talking to you about the different sizes for cutting vegetables, Brunoise, Macédoine, julienne, dice... The bottom line is that you just want to eat something that tastes good much like most people just want to hear something that sounds nice to them. People want those feel good chemicals in their brain released with as little effort as possible.
 
^ To bring it back around to the app discussion, then - most people probably don't care how producers make their music, or if someone uses a tablet live.

From a studio perspective I'd rather pay out big money for a synth, sampler, or something else as opposed to mucking about on a Ipad with a $5 app. Even from a musical perspective I kind of look at as a waste of time, versus learning piano. Its like buying a ukuele and saying you're a guitarist. And then youtube defeats my argument: Ukulele weeps by Jake Shimabukuro - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=puSkP3uym5k
 
^ To bring it back around to the app discussion, then - most people probably don't care how producers make their music, or if someone uses a tablet live.

From a studio perspective I'd rather pay out big money for a synth, sampler, or something else as opposed to mucking about on a Ipad with a $5 app. Even from a musical perspective I kind of look at as a waste of time, versus learning piano. Its like buying a ukuele and saying you're a guitarist. And then youtube defeats my argument: Ukulele weeps by Jake Shimabukuro - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=puSkP3uym5k

You are correct, they don't care.

I prefer having physical keys, knobs and faders myself but i can see the use for this stuff. Especially for musicians that are on the road.
 
You have to be really skilled to make something on an iPad that is good, and if you're that skilled you will be able to afford gear pretty quickly even if from a few small gigs. I've seen someone use an iPad on stage and I wasn't offput because it was still good.
 
Top