Valium
Bluelighter
You sound like a smart level headed person, and I think you need to simply be yourself. If one is to intervene, the classic "intervention" seems too impersonal. One is to be blatant, come across sincere, yet firm.
Let whoever it is know that you are an open level headed person. Let them know that you are not asking them to do anything at all, but rather consider how someone who is not anti drug and who wishes only the best cannot agree with the habits they have fallen into. If that person chooses that you are in fact wrong, then so be it. Dont force them to do anything. Remember, a few bad turns and that couldve have been you.
If you were the person in need of intervention, what would be required for YOU to listen.
Ask yourself that before you start running around and lying to people so you can trap them in a room and impose a lifestyle change.
My 0.02
thanks.
well, lying is hardly the issue here. it would be less than a demi-lie to employ what i mentioned as deceptive teaching...but nevertheless. and i never meant it in the first place that i was planning to trap someone in a room and hold a trial and force confession. the issue is that I know that no one was able to help me, despite their attempts. I, having gone through this crap, should therefore know how to aid someone, theoretically, in my former position....but as I recall that it was something from the inside seeping out that aided me. The horror of the realization that I had been deceiving myself and calling my behavior normal or ignoring it was what led to the curbing of my behavior. I took no radical measures. I simply 'grew out', so now I am thinking, I didn't have a serious enough problem to begin with, rather it was just something that was very anti-me, it was me lying to me....which is the greatest sin i can imagine. Practically, I understand that if I ring all the bells and sound the sirens in alarum, I can help this person scramble out of the hole to at least get back onto the paved road again, and I know that that step is crucial, and imperative for recovery and the 'renaissance' so to speak, of the new self. But that WOULD be imposition, and I do not wish to impose. So is my unwillingness to impose a weakness? Am I weak in that I wish not to impose? Because objectively speaking, the health and safety of a person dear to me is more important than that person's friendship to me. If my rude intervention method [which i don't plan to employ anyway] were to work...the friendship would be ruined, or not...or he would come to the realization upon a clean and sober head that my attempts helped him in the end - but it's also possible that even with that in mind, an invasive method would seem like something too invasive and would ruin the friendship. So, in order to preserve the friendship, I am not intervening, yet i SHOULD? I don't believe in 'objectivism' of any sort but I see the rational method here is the classical intervention method. So what's going on.. I'm confused.
[please answer me only if you take my words seriously. i dont care about who says what in the e-world, but this is a serious topic and i'm honestly confused....delving into the study of clinical psychology and knowing many of its methods is actually spreading this dilemma outward from the center, like a wildfire..too much questioning. someone put me on track - if you please. i'd love some more opinions. i fear i might be overanalyzing or intellectualizing everything to an extreme unfit for transfer unto the practice of the physical world. someone not stuck in a loop like me, push me out, give me some advice...