• LAVA Moderator: Shinji Ikari

Guardianship Nightmare, help

  • Thread starter Thread starter tabbycats
  • Start date Start date
T

tabbycats

Guest
Location: northeast USA

This story is about a nightmarish situation resulting from signing over one's custody to the state, a.k.a. "guardianship" by the state. I know this is long, but please, this is a rare and very emotionally traumatic situation that demands help fast.

I have a family member named Joe. He was born with a genetic condition (chromosome deletion syndrome) that pre-disposes one to various types of mental & developmental illnesses. As a young child it was discovered immediately that he is "partially retarded"; e.g. he has learning disabilities, cannot think abstractly, think logically, however he can carry out a fairly normal conversation about sports, hobbies, food, etc. His face gave his syndrome away, so naturally he was picked on, hit, teased, etc by school peers even though being in special ed (he would interact with mainstream kids in certain classes, the hallway, outside, etc.

Fast-forward to Joe's age of 20/21. Parents divorced at age 12. He lives with his mother and his 'normal' brother (age 17), and his father is mostly out of the picture (poor, non-supportive financially). He shows the first signs of Schizophrenia-related disorder. He has delusions about people attacking him, is paranoid when hearing syrens that the cops are coming for him, and general unrealistic paranoia. After this continues for a while, he begins projecting this paranoia onto other people, he thinks everyone is out to get him, even family members. This turns into violent behavior. Destroying furniture and items. Grabbing knives/weapons and threatening others (despite never lunging at people, just HOLDING the weapons up in an intimidating manner). The police had to show up over 20 separate times and had to restrain him. He was committed to the local psychiatric hospital over 20 times in a span of year or so.

The mother and brother could not handle this trauma anymore, so the mother decided he needed to live in a supported living situation. The family is lower middle-class (less than $40k/year) so the mother cannot afford to rent a house for him and hire a staff. Therefore it was decided to sign a custody agreement, in which the state takes "guardianship" over him. This means he lives in a normal house and is supervised by a state-run staff to restrain him if needed. His mother now has no power of decision. Only his state-employed Guardian (does not live with him) can decide what he eats, what his curfew is, when he visits family, phonecalls etc.

At first it is a relief for his mother and brother that he is in a safe home with staff. We pretty much thought that we could make suggestions here to the guardian regarding Joe (diet, etc), and that he would be cooperative with our desires. Turns out this is far from the case. Eventually the Guardian shows his true colors. He is bitter, has no compassion for Joe at all, and only values Joe for his SSI income that goes to the guardian. Almost every interaction with him on the phone is bitter, he speaks with a mean voice, implies he hates the family, etc. He only allows the mother 10 minutes PER WEEK to talk to Joe on the phone, visits are very limited for Joe, etc. The mother is very knowledgeable about healthy living, eating good, vitamins, food supplements, etc, and wishes for Joe to be on them as well as other healthy foods. She is denied any of this food influence by the guardian.

So after 2 years of living there, it is apparent that the new lifestyle the Guardian assigns Joe can only be described as PASSIVE DESTRUCTION. He does not allow any vitamins which would help his mental symptoms (vitam C, fish oils, etc.). He does not encourage exercise, he is allowing the staff to take him to eat at fast food places like McDonalds nearly EVERYDAY. Worst of all: Joe is drugged up more than is necessary. He is on over 5 extremely powerful sedative medications (klonopin, seroquel, antipsychotics) that are very toxic especially when combined. He shows evidence of permanent nervous system damage from the side-effects (visible, strong leg tremors, involuntary movements, etc.). These are medications the family does NOT want him to be on. The Guardian does not allow him to visit specialists of his genetic syndrome, or try any medications that showed success with his syndrome. There has even been evidence of minor physical abuse by the staff when restraining him, but cannot be proven legally.

Fast-forward to present. Now we initialize legal action. The family hires an inexpensive attorney (< $2000). If we could we would have Joe placed in a staff-environment that is run by the family (e.g. family makes decisions for him) but paid for by the state. We know this is a long shot in court, so we reduce our goals to just having more power of decision over him while he is in that house, like influence over his meals, vitamins, medication, etc.
The outcome is NADA. We don't get any decision-power, and the judge paints a picture that Joe is going to be there a long time, because he "shows no signs of improvement."

This phrase made it dawn upon the family the most horrible nightmare: it is obvious that the Guardian is deliberately preventing Joe from improving by making his health even worse. This is the reason behind all resistance to the family, the horrible diet, the toxic medications, the severely limited socialization with family. The Guardian knows that if Joe shows any substantial signs of improvement, that judge will start considering changing the living circumstances. And the reason the Guardian does not want improvement is because he PROFITS from Joe being there, under his guardianship.

Thank you so much for reading this far, I know it was a lot. Please, any one that can help Joe & our family, we need it desperately! Joe is miserable in this home. He cries everyday that he wants to come home and be with his family, the staff-abuse, and he talks about suicide. Every time the mother sees him, she holds back crying. He looks horrible. He is zombied from the meds. He has gained near 80 POUNDS within 2 years!!!. He has a huge fat stomach because of the horrible diet. His blood shows he is pre-diabetic. If this continues we are going to lose him. I can't see this going on for much longer before it kills him.

Please, the family is broke and cannot afford good attorneys. There are no more hearings with the judge unless we get an attorney. By the time we save up for another cheap one, Joe is going to be in even worse health. Please, give us some way of fighting this situation. We cannot find any legal organizations, or mental health organizations that can help us undue this Guardianship agreement. It is likely that the guardian has strong influence over the court and as of now all court hearings have been and will be an uphill battle. I appreciate you having read this far. Anyone who is knowledgeable about law, please give some suggestions on how we can begin to fix this. At the very least we want to have decision making power over Joey. You will be saving a life.
 
Wow, I'm so sorry to hear this. I'm not the person who could really help, but I read the story and I thought I would just drop by and say that I wish the family the best of luck. I really hope everything works out.
 
Attn Moderator

Moderator,

I would suggest moving this thread to second opinion, but I doubt that section gets much traffic. Maybe it could be Current Events & Politics, since the situation involves a corrupt government system (it seems this would get the best responses). Maybe it could be Healthy Living because of the mental healthy issue. I'd like it to be somewhere where it would get quality responses.

Sorry if this is a duplicate, I didn't see the last reply show up.
 
Wow, this is a very serious situation. It could get some good responses from either the posters here or in SO... both have some very knowledgeable readers who give great advice. We can try it in both places one after another if that helps you out at all. I'm so sorry to hear your troubles OP.. I'm falling asleep at my keyboard right now but I want to read through your story in detail in the morning and share my thoughts. Until then, hopefully someone here can offer you some advice. Hang in there!
 
First of all my question is, what country is this in? I have absolutely no legal expertise, so please take my comments as such, but it seems illegal for a guardian to be assigned to a person, child or adult, who still has a living coherent parent. Despite the fact that the situation got out of control and Joe needed to be moved to a safe living facility where he could get help, the mother should still have the final word. Can you somehow arrange to have him sent to a different facility? Maybe it's just this one that is corrupt. I'd suggest gathering all the evidence that you possibly can to prove your point in court.



Also, the content of your story is probably more appropriate for Second Opinion... so I'm going to move it there for content-consistency purposes.
 
If you are in the U.S. there are public advocates or ombudsmen in most states to handle all sorts of complaints in the Mental Health system, Foster Care system, etc.

Are you in the U.S.? If so, look in County Government website to see if you can find one in your area.
Good luck. This sounds criminal and it almost sounds like the judge is corrupt as well (either that or just can't be bothered.)
Keep us posted. Mods, what about TDS?
 
I noticed in the OP it says they are located in the northeast US...

Also just talking to someone else who isn't involved in the situation but still has some sort of legal ground to stand on, like a policeman, a city councilman, someone higher up than the actual guardian at the care facility, etc. could be fruitful. Just try to complain and tell your story to someone who is in a higher position of authority who can actually make a ruling in your favor or help you take the action you want. Sometimes you have to be pushy to get things to happen, and it sucks but someone will eventually see what's going on and notice that it's not just, and help you out. Get that evidence and tell the right person! Good luck!
 
"but it seems illegal for a guardian to be assigned to a person, child or adult, who still has a living coherent parent. Despite the fact that the situation got out of control and Joe needed to be moved to a safe living facility where he could get help, the mother should still have the final word. Can you somehow arrange to have him sent to a different facility? Maybe it's just this one that is corrupt. I'd suggest gathering all the evidence that you possibly can to prove your point in court."[/I]

This is in the United States. When the violent behavior persisted long enough, social workers began having meetings with the mother to discuss how to proceed since she could no longer have him live at home because of the damage and weapon threats. Because of how unstable he was, it was discussed that the only living arrangement that would work would be a staff of 2-3 who are trained to deal with mentally ill people.

The mother could not afford this herself. The only way such an arrangement could be provided without her paying for it, would be for the state to take custody of Joe and initiate the staffed living situation. Therefore, it was the mother's decision (after discussing with social workers) to release Joe to the guardianship of the state in order for this to happen. She was so desperate at the time from the stress, that she didn't fully consider the implications: that agreeing to this would mean she permanently loses decision-making power. At the time she had the idea that the decision was "temporary" and down the road she could later undue this arrangement if needed, but now here we are facing the harsh reality that it's not that easy.

Because the mother lost ALL decision-power, she cannot even have him sent to a different facility. Anything and everything is up to the guardian, and as explained the guardian is going to do everything he can to keep custody of Joe, because Joe is now a source of income. The only person who can supersede the guardian is the judge, and because the guardian is state-employed, it's no surprise that the judge is going to be siding with the guardian. There is nothing that we can actually PROVE to the judge to make a compelling case against the guardian. The issues of Joe being overweight, over-drugged, and emotionally miserable are "grey area" issues that the court does not consider to be emergencies.

"If you are in the U.S. there are public advocates or ombudsmen in most states to handle all sorts of complaints in the Mental Health system, Foster Care system, etc.

Are you in the U.S.? If so, look in County Government website to see if you can find one in your area.
Good luck. This sounds criminal and it almost sounds like the judge is corrupt as well (either that or just can't be bothered.)"


This is where the problem lies. We cannot find any organizations that act as unbiased advocates for the mentally ill. The majority of organizations who deal with this kind of stuff are somehow tied to government, and because the guardian is state-employed this creates a conflict of interest that prevents the situation from being a priority or even of interest at all to these organizations. Of course no-one told us this directly, but we can read between the lines and when you get the run-around over and over again you begin to notice the patterns.

One cannot not trump the power of government without substantial wealth (obviously). The unwillingness of the judge to consider a change of circumstances is most likely either corruption (he is biased in favor of the state-employed guardian) or ignorance (he is uneducated about health and cannot see that Joe's deteriorating health is a sign of major problems down the road). Either case wouldn't be surprising and in either case Joe and our family are victims.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
One more idea for you. Have you contacted NAMI http://www.nami.org/? It is an national organization with a very good website and links to local branches. They have been very helpful for my family in the past. I am so sorry for your situation. It sounds excruciating.
 
It's a tough situation, because you're asking the state to assume cost and liability, but you want to retain custodial rights over the patient's care.

I can see from the caregiver's POV, that allowing you control over his intake of food and medicine will leave them wide open to negligence/malpractice lawsuit if something were to ever happen, and as they are the ones who deal with him day in/out, and they are a public health care facility, they are probably unwilling to deal with mentally alert patients who will in the best case scenario, be higher maintenance. I completely understand where you're coming from, but maybe seeing it from this light will allow you to move forward with a little more insight. It seems like the caregiver could certainly be more accommodating to this man's family and I agree that psychiatric drugs are not a valid form of long-term medical care. I think a lawyer is the right direction to take here, but the family also has to do their research and find out what the current laws are. Perhaps there is something within the current legislation which they can argue their right to exercise.
 
tabbycats,

Against my better judgment coupled with one too many, I registered to answer this, sort of. Your story is a compelling one. I'm not advising you; I do not represent you, nor do I plan to do so. I'm a nobody. I'm speaking hypothetically.

As a human, I empathizes with your situation, but as a, well, anonymous internet poster... you have some hurdles to overcome. They, however, are not insurmountable. I cannot identify the legal issue for you because, well, that would mean I'm providing you legal advice. But, you have something. It is so obvious a first year law student is capable of identifying the issue.

Here is what you should do: Since you live in the Northeast, Google every law school with 500 miles of your location, or go to the ABA and search for law schools. Most schools have a legal aid division. Lawyers are truly good people that want to help; unfortunately, a few bad apples F'ed it up. What you need is a sympathetic Prof, Student, or legal dept. to take interest in your story. Yes, just like everyone, lawyers need to get paid for what they do; however, if a case is unique or presents a novel legal issue, you'll find that someone will to take it pro bono or low bono. Like I said, you have it. I'm surprised the other lawyer missed it. Parenthetically, $2K is not a lot of money. To use an analogy, if you required heart surgery, would you seek the cheapest Dr possible, and while you're at it, try a coupon? Doubtful…. Do you know what it costs to become a lawyer or doctor? Take your house payment, multiply it by two, add societies utter hatred for lawyers, with a dash of bad economy, and then ask me why I'm surfing Bluelight at 3 a.m. … ha-ha. But I digress.

Basically, some states require pro bono work, and now that the economy is in the shitter, a lot of people are working for free or low bono, so to say. Tell that same story. Tell it with passion. Take your story to every school, every Prof, and every legal aid division you can think of…. You will find what you seek,

I wish you the best
 
Top