Ignoring your psychobabble on the question, those who do not needlessly complicate their thinking just might reply in an honest and forthright way.
As to those who cannot share my view that a genocidal Yahweh is an evil construct, they are obviously immoral fascist dick wads.
Regards
DL
"Psychobabble", heh, I don't know how I can make myself any clearer.
Why do you insist on using the terms "God" and "Yahweh" interchangeably? They are not the same. "God" is a fairly general term referring to some kind of supernatural being. Yahweh is just one quite specific conception of an omnipotent god from a specific branch of ancient religious mythology.
As far as I can tell, the majority of users of this forum are not traditional Christians of the kind from the era when Yahweh was anything more than a fairly specific conception from one of many of the aforementioned religious mythologies. I don't understand your insistence on keeping up a one-sided argument in which no-one is really disagreeing with you. You are preaching to the choir - or rather, ranting to the choir - but the choir, in this case, is not even having the same discussion, like in so many of your threads.
I'm trying to elucidate my perception of the situation as clearly as possible. I am speaking English, and leaving as little room for misinterpretation as I am capable of. I know you have said before that English is not your first language, IIRC, perhaps if I could speak French I could communicate better, but somehow I doubt it.
No one is disagreeing with you! Who do you think you're arguing with?
Would a god like homophobes?
Would a god like misogynous people?
Would a god who can cure use genocide?
Impossible to truly say on absolutely all points because we cannot possibly understand the mind of a superintelligent being but I'll humour you and bring the discussion down to your level and assume that implicit in these questions is that "god" would or should be a compassionate and loving one - in this case, no, of course not, by definition, why are you even asking these questions, Christ, this is going to give me a brain haemorrhage.
Compare what you put to what Yahweh's vile sheeple would say.
Well, yeah, when Yahweh was actually a relevant entity in human culture rather than a relatively forgotten relic, they might say that homosexuality was wrong, treating women kindly was laughable, and genocide is a valid option when waging religious warfare. Nowadays except in certain Islamic theocracies and piss poor third world shitholes where people still believe that if your crop fails maybe it's because your neighbour put a curse on you, these ideas are kind of in the minority, and most people would agree they are wrong. And yes, they are wrong. Has anyone here tried to argue any different? Again, who is it that you think you're arguing with? Is there a subculture of ultra Traditional Yahweh devotees I've somehow missed that you're trying to put to rights?
Isn't there a dedicated forum for discussion of ancient Abrahamic religions somewhere where you could converse with people who actually
do believe in the ideas you constantly rage against, rather than here, where almost no-one does?