MyDoorsAreOpen
Bluelight Crew
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2003
- Messages
- 8,549
One thing I've always believed is that drugs are for adults. But it's easy for me to say that, though, as someone who didn't even discover drugs until adulthood. I was a a nerdy mama's boy in high school, who walked away from the senior awards ceremony with a box of plaques and not a single friend to show them to. I first smoked weed when I was 18 and in college, and have been toking like a champ ever since. I made my first foray into MDMA and psychedelics while teaching English in Taiwan when I was 23. For the longest time, I had no regrets about this. I didn't wish I'd gotten into drugs younger, for now I had the maturity to enjoy them responsibly, I'd tell myself, and didn't subject my brain to abuse while it was still growing and developing.
I've begun to wonder, though, if I'm being a bit sour grapes in saying this. Because I noticed this in college: many of those who claimed to have partied like rockstars in high school, didn't consider drinking or drug use a big deal in college, and didn't seem to do nearly as much of it. For them, this seemed to be a phase that they had 'gotten out of their system', and they were now ready to be adults and buckle down.
It also occurs to me that unlike people who partied heavily as teenagers, I don't naturally see drugs as 'something to grow out of' once I get serious with my life. Even though I don't use drugs besides marijuana with any kind of frequency, nor do I ever plan on stopping completely, unless forced to by health-related or legal circumstances. I guess I just never associated the same sorts of social attitudes and settings with drugs that most people did when I was young. I never thought of using any drug, even marijuana, as an act of youthful rebellion. When I looked to get messed up, it was either because I wanted to explore the deepest reaches of my inner world, or because I just wanted to feel good! These are still my main motivations for using.
If you have kids, would you rather they "rebel" and party hard as teenagers, or would you rather they do as I did, and wait until they're adults before trying any drugs? In terms of physical health, I think there's no arguing: the young adult body and brain are, on the average, far better equipped to handle the challenges of psychotropic drug use, than the growing bodies and brains of minors. But at the level of social development and fitting well into the larger society, I wonder if I case can be made for childhood experimentation, if only for the fact that it often gets left behind after childhood is over. I would guess any prudent attorney would argue for 'do it young and get it done', citing sealed juvenile records, and the simple fact that nothing anyone does as a teenager (save maybe rape and murder) really ever gets held against them anywhere in the adult world. It would seem that society has definitely set up drug use as something to be dabbled in as a youth and then abandoned, and that this remains the path of least resistance, for those with any desire at all to be 'normal' productive citizens.
I've begun to wonder, though, if I'm being a bit sour grapes in saying this. Because I noticed this in college: many of those who claimed to have partied like rockstars in high school, didn't consider drinking or drug use a big deal in college, and didn't seem to do nearly as much of it. For them, this seemed to be a phase that they had 'gotten out of their system', and they were now ready to be adults and buckle down.
It also occurs to me that unlike people who partied heavily as teenagers, I don't naturally see drugs as 'something to grow out of' once I get serious with my life. Even though I don't use drugs besides marijuana with any kind of frequency, nor do I ever plan on stopping completely, unless forced to by health-related or legal circumstances. I guess I just never associated the same sorts of social attitudes and settings with drugs that most people did when I was young. I never thought of using any drug, even marijuana, as an act of youthful rebellion. When I looked to get messed up, it was either because I wanted to explore the deepest reaches of my inner world, or because I just wanted to feel good! These are still my main motivations for using.
If you have kids, would you rather they "rebel" and party hard as teenagers, or would you rather they do as I did, and wait until they're adults before trying any drugs? In terms of physical health, I think there's no arguing: the young adult body and brain are, on the average, far better equipped to handle the challenges of psychotropic drug use, than the growing bodies and brains of minors. But at the level of social development and fitting well into the larger society, I wonder if I case can be made for childhood experimentation, if only for the fact that it often gets left behind after childhood is over. I would guess any prudent attorney would argue for 'do it young and get it done', citing sealed juvenile records, and the simple fact that nothing anyone does as a teenager (save maybe rape and murder) really ever gets held against them anywhere in the adult world. It would seem that society has definitely set up drug use as something to be dabbled in as a youth and then abandoned, and that this remains the path of least resistance, for those with any desire at all to be 'normal' productive citizens.