A total of 860 individuals who have experience with legal high products completed the entire online questionnaire. They were reached primarily via topically-relevant websites. 89% of the respondents are male; the average age is 24.2. Their level of education is relatively high. People from all over Germany took part in the survey, albeit the Southern Federal Länder (in particular Bavaria) are clearly overrepresented. It can be presumed that above all the greater pressure from the prosecution authorities was indirectly responsible for this imbalance: Cannabis users from the Southern Federal Länder above all appear to resort to the legal alternatives more frequently.
Almost all respondent users (99%) have used illegal drugs at least once in their lives, 80% having also used at least one illegal substance apart from cannabis (‘hard drugs’). More than two-thirds have also used cannabis in the last month, and one-third have used at least one ‘hard drug’. Virtually all legal high users therefore have prior experience with illegal drugs, and a particularly large percentage of them have considerable experience (regular cannabis use, trying out several different illegal drugs).
Herbal blends – cannabinoid-containing herbal preparations – are the most prevalent among the legal high products to which the questions referred: 86% of respondents have experience of using these. The lifetime prevalence of research chemicals – pure, synthetic compounds – is 39% and that of other legal highs (e.g. so-called ‘bath salts’) is 35%. Somewhat more than half have used at least one legal high product in the last month. All in all, the respondents named more than 300 different products which they had tried at least once. This illustrates the broad range of legal highs on offer.
Almost two-thirds have taken at least one type of legal high product more than ten times, and can hence be regarded as experienced users. Only a small percentage of the respondents completely substitutes the use of illegal drugs by using legal highs, meaning that legal highs are frequently taken to expand the spectrum of psychoactive substances (or as a temporary stopgap solution should the availability of illegal substances be restricted). Herbal blends are most likely to be used as a mere substitute for illegal drugs (cannabis). The users of these products are somewhat older on average and more frequently live in small towns. There is a noticeable sub-group – 16% of the sample – in which herbal blends are used frequently (more than ten times per month).
Current users of research chemicals are especially likely to be experienced, regular users of various illegal drugs; they also frequent the techno party scene more often. Those who regularly use other legal highs are to be regarded as a more unspecific group of users. Legal availability is a major motive for consumption for more than three respondents out of five; this reason is particularly important among regular herbal blend users. The fact that the active agents cannot be detected (e.g. in traffic checks) plays a larger role in this group than in any other, while such legal consumption motives are much less important for research chemical users. More than half of the respondents stated that they would increasingly shift to other drugs, primarily illegal ones, if legal high products were no longer available. On the whole that the relative ease of availability (primarily via online dealers) appears to be more important than the fact that possession of the drugs is not banned.
The lion’s share of legal high use takes place at home; this also applies to research chemicals, which are generally sold as party drugs (or substitutes) and other legal highs. A considerable share of the respondents has experienced acute side effects or after effects at least once; these occur more frequently among more regular consumers. The most frequently stated conditions, in descending order, were increased heart rate, circulation problems, headaches, nausea and anxiety. Most of the respondents consider not only the risk of acute physical problems as high, but also that of long-term damage. Roughly one-third has also been deterred from continuing to use specific products because of side effects. Internet shops in Germany and abroad are by far the most important source of all types of legal high products. Headshops were also used by a notable sub-group for herbal blends and other legal highs (it remains unclear however at what time). Some of the respondents also acquire the substances via friends or through acquaintances.
The source of information used most frequently by legal high users by far is online fora, whilst virtually no use is made of media such as the press and television. This indicates the considerable importance of information which should be as up-to-date as possible, and should come from sources who are familiar with legal highs. All in all, the results regarding sources of acquisition and information reveal the considerable importance of the Internet for the legal high phenomenon.
The sufficiently large sample that was reached in a comparatively short time proves that there is a market for this kind of product. The size and share among the overall population of this group would have to be clarified by a corresponding representative survey. It is possible to identify a variety of user types by using the data on consumption patterns. These range from cannabis and/or herbal blend users pure and simple, on the one hand, to regular users of a variety of drugs, including research chemicals, on the other.
Even if there is a sizeable sub-group of ‘pure’ legal high users, the products in question are not used instead of illegal drugs in the majority of cases, but rather in addition to them. Especially among users of herbal blends the major reasons for consumption are to be regarded as consequences of the Narcotics Act (Betäubungsmittelgesetz). However, the evident lack of availability and/or quality and the inconvenience of acquisition, play a somewhat more prominent role here than the risk of being prosecuted (including traffic checks). Such legal motives however often play a minor role in the consumption of research chemicals.
Since there is a lack of empirical data on the subject so far, further – quantitative and qualitative – studies would be desirable.
