In my hoapitlevery non ICU (intensive care unit) patients get private rooms. Hopitals must be retrofited for earthquakes by 2014 and that might be a part of the hospital boom.
Anyway, all non icu (intensive care) patients get private rooms. The rationale was patient confidentiality and preventing the spread of drug resistant microrganisms like ESBL, VRE, and MRSA. I think the real reason was increasing patient satisfaction so they would choose our hospital as a choice- money the bottom line.
Now as for health insurance given a choice, its probably the patriotic thing to choose employee health insurance. This might cost the employer more given te need for economic recovery, but I would bet the NHS service are strained given their debate on cutting the green. Desperate times call for desperate measures.
So grit your teeth, the diparity of care is disconcerting- but altleast they can get comprehensive medical coverage.
On Oprah, which i very rarely watch they were comparing systems around the world. In The Neatherlands you had like 3 or 4 tiers that entitled you to different levels of services. The cost was the same for each tier but companies, which you could choose freely, had to compete for better service given the price was the same. I'm sure they had a system for those unable to pay (tier 1).
Michael Moore is a great documentary maker but their was some controversy surounding his socialized care system- that they were allowed to film selectively or something like that. You want to see an excellent example of socialized medicine and Barbados springs to mind. This was 2006, care was free, and people from other carribean islands would go there to take advatange of the medical system's percs. This was based on a conversation I had with a fellow RN when on vacation their. This was 2006, things might have changed.
As for the Queen, one advantage is that she holds the Commonwealth together. I read last night when they were discussing diferent dept holders that the UK owns like 7.5 % of the national debt in hard currency $ reserves.
Not as much as China, but you could seriously damage our failed economy.
The monarchies, in the middle east, brutal, abusive, corrupt, were the last place I expected a revolt to occur. Will see how many last.
In the USA each citizen is in theory sovereign. I've been hearing lots of unrest, in doctors offices, on the street, this may be the next area were massive revolt takes place- "a revolution now and then isn't such a bad thing,"
hunt for red october. Having said that, in this republic, the voters can revolt by ballot- rigged election acusations aside.
As for poor and our hospital, we had one patient that was an ass- homeless- which wasn't the problem but very demanding of the staff. He had 2 mg dilaudid ordered every 2 hrs which he would throw a fit if he didn't get on the clock, would go out and smoke even though he wasn't allowed to leave the unit, and threw a fit when the nutrition department wasn't sending him extra trays. We were working hard to placate him and the hospital was eating the cost. Finally he left against medical advice because we wouldn't do his bidding. He was back (would go hospital to hospital) and we had him sign a contract that he would follow the rules to get into a nursing home. When he found their rules to be more restrictive, he hung out for a few more shots of dilaudid and up and left. His care and demands were met regardless of ability to pay.
Also, now they supposedly have a website that lists hospital ER wait times- so there is a push to make beds available to admit patients.
But california is a state that is known for better nurse

atient ratios compared to other states and from what I been hearing, there are differences in the delivery of care state to state, although there is a national board each state and territory has individual, autonomous boards both medical, nursing, ect...that govern and oversee the delivery of care in their state.