MyDoorsAreOpen
Bluelight Crew
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2003
- Messages
- 8,549
All I'll say is this -- I joined a Masonic lodge looking for philosophy and spirituality, and found a dying old boys' club in which the philosophical and spiritual aspects have been very much downplayed. At least here in the Northeastern US, it attracts a very right-wing crowd who care much more about preserving a (real or imagined) social order in which being a white male carries inherent privilege, than they care about any kind of personal inner transformation.
Bottom line, I'm highly supportive of Freemasonry in theory and principle. But until I run across a lodge full of kindred spirits (which I'm still hopeful exists somewhere), I'm rather jaundiced on it in actual practice. The organization has a lot of work to do and revisions to be made if it's to meet the social (to say nothing of philosophical, ethical, or spiritual) needs of the younger generation in the US. If it does not meet these challenges soon, it is moribund.
The UK may be a whole different cup o' joe. Freemasonry is, after all, indigenous to Britain, and has doubtless played a very different role in your society than mine. I would not be surprised if the group attracts a fundamentally different crowd in Britain than the US or other British diaspora countries.
I've never gotten a straight answer on Masonry's connection to atheism. On the surface, no, the Masons do not accept people who come to them as unbelievers. But at the same time, Masonry is clearly a product and champion of Enlightenment values and principles, and its theology has been described as Deist. I wonder if maybe (at least originally), the reason the Masons did not accept atheists upfront, was because atheism or something close to it was actually the central revelation of Masonry, and the specific way in which the former believer was lowered gently and comfortably into a state of unbelief was what the Masons had to offer, such that being an atheist from day one would render the whole transformative process rather underwhelming. This theory also offers an interesting perspective on why Masonry is dying out -- its "secrets" are no longer uncommon, shocking, or even that controversial anymore, now that secularism is popular.
Bottom line, I'm highly supportive of Freemasonry in theory and principle. But until I run across a lodge full of kindred spirits (which I'm still hopeful exists somewhere), I'm rather jaundiced on it in actual practice. The organization has a lot of work to do and revisions to be made if it's to meet the social (to say nothing of philosophical, ethical, or spiritual) needs of the younger generation in the US. If it does not meet these challenges soon, it is moribund.
The UK may be a whole different cup o' joe. Freemasonry is, after all, indigenous to Britain, and has doubtless played a very different role in your society than mine. I would not be surprised if the group attracts a fundamentally different crowd in Britain than the US or other British diaspora countries.
I've never gotten a straight answer on Masonry's connection to atheism. On the surface, no, the Masons do not accept people who come to them as unbelievers. But at the same time, Masonry is clearly a product and champion of Enlightenment values and principles, and its theology has been described as Deist. I wonder if maybe (at least originally), the reason the Masons did not accept atheists upfront, was because atheism or something close to it was actually the central revelation of Masonry, and the specific way in which the former believer was lowered gently and comfortably into a state of unbelief was what the Masons had to offer, such that being an atheist from day one would render the whole transformative process rather underwhelming. This theory also offers an interesting perspective on why Masonry is dying out -- its "secrets" are no longer uncommon, shocking, or even that controversial anymore, now that secularism is popular.