• ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️



    Film & Television

    Welcome Guest


    ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️
  • ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️
    Forum Rules Film Chit-Chat
    Recently Watched Best Documentaries
    ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️
  • Film & TV Moderators: ghostfreak

film: 3:10 to yuma

rate this movie

  • [img]http://i.bluelight.ru/g//543/1star.gif[/img]

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • [img]http://i.bluelight.ru/g//543/2stars.gif[/img]

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • [img]http://i.bluelight.ru/g//543/3stars.gif[/img]

    Votes: 2 16.7%
  • [img]http://i.bluelight.ru/g//543/4stars.gif[/img]

    Votes: 9 75.0%
  • [img]http://i.bluelight.ru/g//543/5stars.gif[/img]

    Votes: 1 8.3%

  • Total voters
    12

thujone

Bluelight Crew
Joined
Aug 31, 2006
Messages
12,819
Location
::1
i just saw the trailer for this... hooolllyy shIIIIIIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEET!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

i cant wait for this... EVERY DAY IS AGONY

how long have i waited for russell crowe to be featured in another western, HOW LONG? and christian bale well... fuck that screwball looks good in any fucking part he's like a chameleon. i would murder someone in bright daylight in front of a police station with witnesses present for tix to sneak preview :!
 
Everything about this movie looks awesome. And Christian Bale can do no wrong (except for Reign of Fire, GOD was that a terrible movie, not that it was his fault, just a terrible movie). :D
 
The movie is based on an Elmore Leonard story, and he did some kickass westerns before he got into crime fiction.

I'm excited.
 
ego_loss said:
The movie is based on an Elmore Leonard story, and he did some kickass westerns before he got into crime fiction.

I'm excited.


you do realise they already made this film about 40 years ago, right?

....starring Glenn Ford.

ok, i did some research, actually it was released 50 years ago.....1957.
 
Very cool movie.

The backbone of the film are the 3 male leads: Russell Crowe, Christian Bale and little-known perennial scene stealer Ben Foster (as Charlie Prince). They look and sound great and the inertia of the performances drives the movie. The atmosphere of the film's world in general is well crafted. There's an abundance of 70s porn star vagina mouth facial hair, lots of mutton chops and mustaches and so forth. Everyone is appropriately dirty and sunburnt, while somehow still managing to look cool. The peripheral characters are equally well acted and colorfully brutal, fleshing out the film's impression of the Old West as a harsh and rugged place where the weak die fast. Peter Fonda (I didn't recognize him at all in this role) is especially good as a tough Pinkerton bounty hunter.

There's plenty of action, some of it quite gory, and also a surprising amount of character depth (or maybe not surprising given the actors). There are a few cheesy moments, but the overall quality of the film easily cancels them out. Also be prepared for some subtly humorous lines. Russell Crowe is powerfully charismatic as super outlaw Ben Wade, a Hannibal Lecter-type villain who is effortlessly violent and always in control, even in captivity. You wait for his downfall but root for him to win.

I don't know what it is about this era, but outlaws and cowboys just look cool.

The avalanche of B-grade Westerns that Hollywood churned out for most of the 1930s, 40s and 50s thoroughly oversaturated the market and ultimately the public turned away from them. With the Clint Eastwood spaghetti westerns and newer takes on the genre, like Tombstone and the 3:10 To Yuma, we know that the Western can be a vehicle for some very entertaining filmmaking. Now, we just have to wait and see what The assassination of Jesse James is going to bring to the table.
 
Benefit said:
and newer takes on the genre, like Tombstone and the 3:10 To Yuma,


stinkfoot said:
you do realise they already made this film about 40 years ago, right?

....starring Glenn Ford.

ok, i did some research, actually it was released 50 years ago.....1957.


more like "a newer take on an old classic".
 
I really enjoyed this. Even the ending, which took a corny, unrealistic turn, managed to twist again in the final seconds and preserve the integrity of the overall good package.

Four stars, only because I'm not a big fan of westerns.

j/k, I wouldn't withhold a star just for that. ;)
 
I was thoroughly captivated ... until the end. I found the end far too inconsistent or brief to be solid. Actually, during my viewing i was thinking to myself "now why would he be doing that?" on more than one occasion. Thinking about it afterward, i got the point, but the change is so sudden that it seemingly defies it's own nature. And being so fast to change the last moment cheesiness is infinitely moreso.

(3.75) 4/5
 
Imo, all the good bits were in the previews & the movie was far too drawn out.
 
Did anyone notice the attention to detail with regard to the amount of shots that actually were fired from each six shooter -- six shots, and reload...it seemed to me they really made an attempt to make that as realistic as possible...
 
Top