It's all bs guys, read article carefully and note absolutely zero conclusive evidence of anything.
Your post on p.1 was just as hollow as this. "Conclusive" is what, exactly? The hospital
says they tested positive last night for lsd, that is actually 'conclusive' at this point IMO, unsure if you need them to mail you the lab work to convince you they ingested lsd? Or you theory is this must be intentional lacing of lsd by a family member as some kind of ploy- something that, if that's your stance,
is 'conclusive evidence of [some]thing', namely the silliest DiTM story in a minute
![Wink ;) ;)]()
[edit: the claim is that, yesterday, a 5y/o and 7y/o girl, the pregnant chick and another iirc, all went in tripping face and testing for lsd
at the hospital. While I won't rule out intentional shit by the family- it seems just as likely as it being a single, random, lsd-tainted bottom-round on shelf at walmart. Am wondering if there's teenagers in the house? Would be my 1st instinct for the obvious.. this is my county's thing though, so it's been on allll day on any local channels and the interest (hopefully) makes it more likely it'll be solved.]
I'm gonna have to agree. After what you pointed out to me last night the article really doesn't make any sense. Admittedly I hadn't really read much of the article. Just mainly the title and the quote in this thread.
So you don't care to verify anything, and you agree w/ his unfounded conclusions? lol, read more / post less, ya?
("after what you pointed out to me last night" - if he doesn't edit that post, re-read it: he pointed out jack shit. He said "it's a fraud, it's someone's old lsd"
![Wink ;) ;)]()
)
It wasn't clear as to how they got sick but the examiner pointed to it being LSD.
How do they get to that conclusion?
And who gets sick from LSD?
This is half funny and half ridiculous, but Bo'C bit..