Experimenting again after 6 years clean?

Hamclamp: Thanks for sharing your story, you make a lot of good points. I think it's true that the risk of taking a chance may not at all be worth it. Well, the Ayahuasca I have no issue with trying and thats not really part of my question here. The issue was more to do with MDMA if it was something I could use in a way that was not harmful.

With regards to seeking justification, I think it's important to get as many sources unbiased information as possible. If I wanted justification, do you think posting in a place where most people are going through addiction is the best place to get it? Wouldn't it make more sense to post in the MDMA section and ask them to all tell me how wonderful it is?

Since I left AA I've been doing nothing but reading up on addiction and substance use, to try come with a perspective that makes sense to me. I do not take this issue lightly and if I wanted easy justification I would not be looking for it in this forum.

Thanks again for all your responses.
 
Abstinence as the only way after having had an addiction is never going to get shot down because it is irrefutably the safest approach. There isn't a lot of data about what sorts of people, in what numbers are able to return to use that is non-destructive.

I think that the best chance of moderate use is to have some rules about using again and be ready to scrap "the experiment" if these rules are broken. How many days out of a month would constitute reasonable use in your opinion? Quantities? If you went over could you put the breaks on and re-achieve abstinence? Are there people who could help with either stopping or detecting problems?

Stating that OP came here for justification sounds like 12 step rhetoric to me. Perhaps it isn't my place to make attributions about why people post what they do but since it has been done to OP it is probably OK to spread it around a little.

A safety plan and monitoring is probably the second best choice after sticking w/ abstinence.
 
If you stuck your left hand into a meat grinder and lost your left hand, six years later would you really want to see what would happen if you stick your right hand into a meat grinder?

You've been doing well in life and moving forward for the last six years. Keep doing that. You haven't needed drugs in that amount of time and you can keep going longer. Honestly, I think you'd be making a very dumb mistake going back to experimenting and you're already in trouble because you are intellectualizing and reasoning away that it'll all be fine since you've been doing so well. I fucked up hardcore a few times thinking that way and I don't have enough fingers and toes to count all the other people I've seen fuck up in the same way.

You stand losing everything that you have worked so hard to gain right now if you go back to it. Even the drinking could be a huge, huge mistake. If you are seriously thinking about going back to using again you should go to a NA meeting right now, today, tonight, and share with the group about it and listen to what people have to say. I think you're forgetting some very important things.
 
junctionalfunkie: Thanks for the link, I just ordered a couple of books but I'd like to add this one to my next order. And yeah, the cover is unfortunate ;) Do you have any views on Stanton Peele? I've been reading a lot of his material and some of his ideas are very interesting.

Eotorv: That sounds sensible to me. If rules were made and broken from the beginning then that's a pretty good sign that the experiment is not going to turn out well. And yeah without a doubt abstinence is the only risk-free route.

das_feuer: I think it's important to use a bit of intellect because this is exactly what AA/NA says not to do. It's interesting how some beliefs just don't hold up to logic once they are actually examined. Your analogy would be more accurate if I were asking if it is okay for me to abuse drugs once again. This is not my question.

Research shows that the majority of alcoholics who quit do so on their own, or just cut down to moderate levels. How is this so? The fact is that some people are able to moderate their use of substances. I don't know the percentage and I'm not claiming that this is possible for me, I'm simply asking the question. I want to know what allows people to do so, what is it about them or their lifestyle that allows them to do this? To say it is impossible is simply untrue. Unlikely for the majority of cases? Maybe so.

But one thing is certain, if you go to AA and incorporate what they tell you, you will tend to go on a horrendous binge if you decide to have a drink. Studies have also shown this. If sobriety is defined only as complete abstinence, then 1 drink is the same as 10 so why not go all out. This is unhelpful black and white thinking.
 
Stating that OP came here for justification sounds like 12 step rhetoric to me. Perhaps it isn't my place to make attributions about why people post what they do but since it has been done to OP it is probably OK to spread it around a little.

A safety plan and monitoring is probably the second best choice after sticking w/ abstinence.

Since I guess I implied that I must interject that I have no clue what happens at 12 step programs. I've never been to one. My history with addiction is to prescribed pain meds the last two years which I want off of. Never taken anything that wasn't prescribed or an extra pill or two. Sorry. It just rather seemed obvious from the OP postings.

Reading the last post from the OP it seems I was on the right track. Of course the OP will deny that. He has already had more people tell him not to do it but still waits for more approval.

I mean him no harm! He asked opinions and I think it's rather stupid and risky given his previous status as an addict. I hope he does the smart thing but wish him well no matter what :) I have said my peace and will no longer read this thread. What happens, happens. But shit usually happens...'nuff said :\
 
Help_me_please, I wish you well too. And thank you for your feedback and concern.
 
It isn't worth the risk. Once an addict, always an addict. Chances are if you had problems with drugs before, you can have problems with them again, even six years later. Sure, some get back to dabbling in drugs, but most don't. I don't think I've heard many stories where people sober up for years, go back to drugs, and maintain.
 
^"Once an addict, always an addict." is an absolutist statement of dogma isn't it? Everything else you said seems reasonable to me and has a rational tone. The OP has acknowledged that there is risk and that abstinence is the safest option. Don't we have to acknowledge at some point that this is the OPs choice and that he will live with the consequences?

"It isn't worth the risk" is an assessment based on our own experience and the people we have known and observed. I believe we can conclude that any benefits of use are outweighed by the risks for ourselves & maybe for a few people in our lives that we know very well. I don't think we can conclude that for other people.

Telling our relevant stories and experiences and sharing hard data is likely more persuasive than telling other people what to do anyways, at least in my opinion.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
User_Name_Here: Thanks for the feedback. It may not be worth the risk. But I do tend to disagree with the idea of "once an addict, always an addict". The current recovery industry, viewing addiction as a disease, has an abysmal success rate. I worked in a private drug rehab center for a year and most of these people do not do well long-term.

What happens to people with a food addiction who cannot stop eating. Abstinence is impossible, they are forced to learn how to eat appropriately. Yet food causes dopamine release just like drugs do. Why is this any different? We can form addictions with any kind of experience. Why can somebody who compulsively has sexual relationships stop this behavior and learn to have a loving relationship? Once an addict, always an addict, just doesn't make sense in these situations.

It can be argued that there is no appropriate level of drug use, but given that just about every society since the beginning of time has found ways to alter their consciousness through various substances, without needing rehabs or AA, I don't think this is a valid argument.

I think this is an extremely important issue, regardless of my current question about being able to moderate my own use. There is so much misinformation being spread about addiction, and the current treatments being offered are superstitious nonsense.
 
Hi everyone,

I was a member here about 6-7 years ago. At that time I was 18 years old, dropped out of school, wasn't working, and was just doing a lot of speed/E. I ended up spending 4 months in rehab and I stayed completely off of all substances (except caffeine/nicotine, which I quit more recently) for 6 years.

A month or so ago I decided that AA/NA was closing my mind rather than encouraging my growth, so I left. I also resumed social drinking and it has not been much of an issue. This has led me to believe that I could experiment with other substances, now that I have a more mature mind and actually have somewhat of a life that I don't want to throw away. I work full time, will be starting my masters degree soon, pay all my bills, exercise, etc. I'm also in weekly therapy so I am doing my best to deal with my issues in life rather than run away from them.

In particular I am drawn to the MDMA experience. Also cannabis, which I had started to hate, but which at first I loved the feeling. I love dancing and so I'm drawn to the rave scene. In addition, I know somebody who is a member of a church that consumes Ayahuasca in a traditional ceremonial manner, which I would like to partake in.

I was wondering if anybody has any feedback on starting to use substances again but with the intention of using it for not only fun but also growth, rather than in a self destructive manner.

Thanks!

People will sit here and debate every little factor in the world about why you should or shouldn't go back.

I'm going to keep this as SIMPLE as I can.
It doesn't matter if you're responsible.
It doesn't matter if you're irresponsible.

What matters is that over the course of 6 years, you still managed to entertain the idea of going back to using.

Now ask yourself why?

I'll answer that for you. Because you most likely have a very deep and personal but TWISTED love for drugs like a good deal of people in these forums. Drugs don't answer you back, you don't have to feel out their mood to calibrate how you're gonna approach them, you don't have to worry about them cheating on you.. or failing you on a test.

Drugs are not human, and I hate to say it, thats sometimes why they're so easy to love (look how humans graviate to dogs).
If you go back, I believe you will soon reinitiate that love. All the NATURAL VOIDS in your life will be quelled temporarily, and you'll feel like you're in love again. Life WILL get better.. but it will also be a dream you're living in.
And dreams always end.

Don't tell yourself you don't love drugs cause you've managed to stay clean for X amount of time. Tell yourself you love them more than anything in this world because you WAITED 6 years to relinquish that spark. I just can't tell you its a smart thing to do. A drug can't tell you "you're too in love with me and its creeping me out" they will allow to love them untill your 6 feet under.

Its the most deceptive form of "love" in the world. I really don't think you need that shit in your life.
 
Bojangles69 said:
Don't tell yourself you don't love drugs cause you've managed to stay clean for X amount of time. Tell yourself you love them more than anything in this world because you WAITED 6 years to relinquish that spark.
So the OP should engage in self talk to stoke up his desire as a motivational strategy to not do them. That seems like advising getting aroused to psych yourself up for sexual abstinence imo.

The OP mentioned why he was contemplating using again, why does everyone assume his motivations are drastically different than what he stated? It is worth asking about his motivations but positing that any of us know his motives better than he does is comes off as pretty arrogant.

It would be like my positing that someone was posting advocacy for abstinence because he can not stand the though of someone else succeeding in moderation and having an OK time where as he can not accomplish that. Unhelpful speculation, it would be much better for me to ask if it is possible that is a motive than state it is someone's motive.
 
So the OP should engage in self talk to stoke up his desire as a motivational strategy to not do them. That seems like advising getting aroused to psych yourself up for sexual abstinence imo.

The OP mentioned why he was contemplating using again, why does everyone assume his motivations are drastically different than what he stated? It is worth asking about his motivations but positing that any of us know his motives better than he does is comes off as pretty arrogant.

It would be like my positing that someone was posting advocacy for abstinence because he can not stand the though of someone else succeeding in moderation and having an OK time where as he can not accomplish that. Unhelpful speculation, it would be much better for me to ask if it is possible that is a motive than state it is someone's motive.

Enki : Do you have any opinion on the idea of moderation after a period of abstinence?
 
What matters is that over the course of 6 years, you still managed to entertain the idea of going back to using.

Now ask yourself why?

.

Bojangles, I completely agree that "why?" I have this idea is a very important question. This is what I am spending a lot of time questioning at the moment.

But I don't think that it has to do with a sick love for drugs that I have suppressed for 6 years. I think it has more to do with reading different views of addiction and learning that most of what I've been taught in AA is a pile of bullshit. I can't help but question the idea of complete abstinence being a necessity, especially if research on this topic shows that many people labelled as "alcoholics" end up drinking moderately with no problem rather abstain. Interestingly, having followed an abstinence-based treatment program was one of factors for NOT being able to moderate. Tell people they can't, and they can't! I'm not pulling these ideas out of my head. Really I'm not quite sure why these ideas are not discussed more often, given that the current recovery industry is failing miserably. There are a lot of assumptions that are taken for granted.

Like I said, I do not know it this applies to me or not, but that is what I'm trying to figure out for myself.
 
Last edited:
Legerity said:
Enki : Do you have any opinion on the idea of moderation after a period of abstinence?
Yes, I think it is attainable by some people. I'm not arguing it is advisable. I'm influenced Claude Steiner's "Games Alcoholic Play", Stanton Peele and others who are operating from non-AA/NA models. I think labeling all addictions as the same "disease entity" is a over simplification and causes universal prescriptions for problems that are not the same.

A rash is a rash, mine got better when I took benedryl so everybody with rashes should now take benedryl. It isn't that easy. Some people are likely not going to every do well with substances or at least some substances because of innate personality or biochemical issues. The blanket prescription of abstinence is the safest route because we don't really know who is of what sort of situation.

By my personal observation people with huge dependency issues do attain moderate use. It would be foolish for me to try to estimate numbers.

People's addictions & out of control use can be due to immaturity, emotional problems that get better, a bad living situation---but sometimes it is about something less fixable and more ingrained.

The idea mentioned above of setting limits and having a safety plan makes sense to me. Abstinence makes sense also. It is totally an individual's choice.Predicting certain doom or predicting certain success seems about trying to influence you on what you ought to do. I only wish I had some solid data for you about who is more at risk for destructive use or moderate use after a recovery period of abstinence.
 
Yes, I think it is attainable by some people. I'm not arguing it is advisable. I'm influenced Claude Steiner's "Games Alcoholic Play", Stanton Peele and others who are operating from non-AA/NA models. I think labeling all addictions as the same "disease entity" is a over simplification and causes universal prescriptions for problems that are not the same.

A rash is a rash, mine got better when I took benedryl so everybody with rashes should now take benedryl. It isn't that easy. Some people are likely not going to every do well with substances or at least some substances because of innate personality or biochemical issues. The blanket prescription of abstinence is the safest route because we don't really know who is of what sort of situation.

By my personal observation people with huge dependency issues do attain moderate use. It would be foolish for me to try to estimate numbers.

People's addictions & out of control use can be due to immaturity, emotional problems that get better, a bad living situation---but sometimes it is about something less fixable and more ingrained.

The idea mentioned above of setting limits and having a safety plan makes sense to me. Abstinence makes sense also. It is totally an individual's choice.Predicting certain doom or predicting certain success seems about trying to influence you on what you ought to do. I only wish I had some solid data for you about who is more at risk for destructive use or moderate use after a recovery period of abstinence.


Stanton Peele has a lot of interesting ideas, I'm reading "Diseasing of America" right now. I have not heard of "Games Alcoholics Play" but I'll make sure to keep an eye open for it.

It seems like it's something that just can't be predicted 100%, so it always involves a certain amount of risk even if a person is completely confident in themselves. The immaturity and life situation are two factors that have changed for me. What I question most is whether me as a person has changed enough over the years that I feel confident in my abilities, or whether I still have the same issues that led to abuse in the first place. Things to think about :)

Thanks for your input.
 
A month or so ago I decided that AA/NA was closing my mind rather than encouraging my growth, so I left. I also resumed social drinking and it has not been much of an issue. This has led me to believe that I could experiment with other substances

Come on man, you've been in recovery, and you are treading a very slippery slope. I've only just entered the NA/CA game and what I've quoted, I'm sorry but these guys must be right, you're doing exactly what they say will happen when you step out the middle of the meetings..

I can understand that you havent been feeling right, but that happens in life mate, you can't just blame the meetings. Think about it was it the meetings closing your mind or something else...

I wish you well mate with whatever decision you take!!
 
Come on man, you've been in recovery, and you are treading a very slippery slope. I've only just entered the NA/CA game and what I've quoted, I'm sorry but these guys must be right, you're doing exactly what they say will happen when you step out the middle of the meetings..

I can understand that you havent been feeling right, but that happens in life mate, you can't just blame the meetings. Think about it was it the meetings closing your mind or something else...

I wish you well mate with whatever decision you take!!

oli, I wish you well too, it's great that you got yourself clean. I've spent a lot of time in meetings and I've come to my conclusions based on my experience. If you feel they are helping you then do what works.
 
Just to chime in here, I was sober for a year. I went to AA and got so fed up with it, with all the fanatics, and whatnot... even though I was scared that I would completely go off the rails, I said fuck it and I've been drinking again for about a week now.

I feel like alcohol is really bad and destructive though. I would like to get some LSD or other type of psychedelic.

So my advise to the OP is - if you're questioning it, you will end up doing it, just a matter of time is all. I questioned it for 3-4 months before doing it... the gears are already turning in your mind. The time and place will come; Just make sure it's planned well!

:)
 
So the OP should engage in self talk to stoke up his desire as a motivational strategy to not do them.

Umm no.. not quite. He shouldn't "stoke up" anything. You just added about 70thousand words to something I didn't even say, then tried to play if off like I said it.

Read a little deeper into what I actually said.
There are people in this world w/out drug problems that get addicted. But after 6 years of time, they forget that drugs exist and get on with life.

There are people in this world WITH drug problems that get addicted. But after 60 years off them, they STILL are tempted to use. You think it really matters WHY he wants to use (his 'motivation')? And you're implying "arrogance" on my part? His motivation for using means absolutely shit. He says NOW that his motivation THEN was "self destruction" but that didn't become his motivation untill he stopped and realized that he was simply just being destructive (I'm sure when he actually started he wasn't motivated to destroy his life). And now his motivation is "growth". Watch how fast that motivation changes too.

Drug users change their motivations to use about 5 billion times in the course of a short time just so they can KEEP using.

My point is if he COULD handle life reponsibly with drugs, he can handle life responsibly w/out them. The fact he's in a such a deeply contemplative state about it, shows hes having issues living life right now w/out them. And that to me forecast more problems than less. If he didn't have a problem he'd just go get high and not make a big deal about it, instead he came here to make a thread about it and research for however long untill he decides he can really care less about what everyone says, and the only "real answer" is to just go get high and find out. So what me or you says really doesn't matter at all. Somewhere inside he has a desire to use, (otherwise this thread wouldn't exist) which predisposes him to the bias of only taking advice from people who recommend he CAN control himself. If he didn't wanna use, he'd be more likely to argue with people telling him he CAN control himself. No human can ever be completely objective about things so personally related to them.

I put down 50 bucks that within the next month he drops MDMA. Is that "arrogant" enough for you?


That seems like advising getting aroused to psych yourself up for sexual abstinence imo.

What in the WORLD are you talking about? You could also percieve that ducks are really monkeys if thats where you brain is bound to take you. Green sometimes "seems" blue, smart people sometimes seem dumb, but you definitely seem like you're not paying attention to what I said. Theres content and intent, focus on the intent. It will help you understand better.

And by the way, getting aroused to the point of orgasm is perhaps the BEST way to prep for sexual abstinence. How often do you get done jerking off (assuming your male) then think "wow I'm horny now"? Think about it.


The OP mentioned why he was contemplating using again, why does everyone assume his motivations are drastically different than what he stated? It is worth asking about his motivations but positing that any of us know his motives better than he does is comes off as pretty arrogant.

I'm sorry but you obviously are just not too sharp. His motivations don't mean a g/damn thing. I'll say it again. His motivation NOW, in reflection to his past drug use was "self destruction" but that was NOT his motivation at the present time that he was actually destroying his life. How many people say "I wanna use drugs so I can destroy my life"?
Now he wants to "grow", you think that motivation is actually going to be fullfilled? MDMA is going to make him "grow"? WHO THE HELL invents these ideas? You "grow" by eating, shitting, going to work and living a normal life. Drugs (the drugs he mentions) have NOTHING to do with the growth process till some idiot drug addict told and wrote that he "grew" on drugs. Show me what biology book you read in highschool that says "mdma helps people grow"?
And I'm the "arrogant" one lmao!

It would be like my positing that someone was posting advocacy for abstinence because he can not stand the though of someone else succeeding in moderation and having an OK time where as he can not accomplish that. Unhelpful speculation, it would be much better for me to ask if it is possible that is a motive than state it is someone's motive.

Now aren't YOU assuming MY "motivations"? You are all over the place with your contradictions.
I HOPE he "succeeds" in moderation, really.. I do. I don't believe in NA or AA myself. They essentially force the addict identity onto everyone, addicts and nonaddicts alike, and you wind up with people who were born nonaddicts now thinking if they ever use again its over.. which creates the behavoirs of an actual addict.
So obviously NA/AA is fundamentally flawed. If you believe everything they say you're an addict no matter what. Its a terrible form of brainwashing. I also see people going to NA and getting worse over time because of this. They hear "once and addict always an addict" SO MANY friggn times over the years that they REALLY start believing they're an addict.. and they really start to act like it to (by relapsing 40 times a week).

I'm basing my decision to tell him not to use MDMA or whatever else is gonna help him "grow" on the fact that he had to come here first to get approval that hes really not a drug addict. NA already seems to have brainwashed him a fair deal. But the fact still exists that he DOESN'T KNOW what he is. He's NOT SURE if he can control himself.

So based on that I will attempt to be as objective as I can.

First, it does NOT matter if you ARE or ARE NOT an "addict". You could be addicted to heroin for 30 years and still not be an addict. You only are what people tell you you are, and you only are what you come to believe you are. I DO believe someone can learn to control themself, the same way they can unlearn to control themself.
The only reason I advise him not to, is because people with a history of drug abuse *usually tend to repeat those those behavoirs. Is there a 49% chance he won't? Maybe, but at this point he's basically thowing his life on a roulette table and hoping it doesn't land on "addicted".

Whats more than being an addict or nonaddict is KNOWING YOURSELF. I don't really care which one he is as much as I care how much he truely knows the person he is. And the fact is heuristics have just as much, if not more to do with someones habits than their nature.

Example: Do I think I'm an addict? No, after 3 wds from opiates and 1 bad speed habit I still don't think so. But, there still remains the concept of heuristics.
I started drinking socially just like he is now. I VERY MUCH told myself I'm fine, I have the self control and I KNOW IT (which we never really can know we can only think we know). But still, I genuinely believe if opiates weren't so easily available to me in the form of online opium pods, I prob STILL would just be socially drinking and smoking pot from time to time.
I can't imagine what I could have possibly gotten addicted to besides pods, they were new to me, and I was naive, even after all my past shit.

The heuristics of his current life will have A LOT to do with the end result, not just his nature.
He appears to like MDMA, I don't think MDMA is that addictive at all personally. And he sounds smart enough in this thread to completely control his use. I'm more worried about what hasn't happened yet and what he doesn't know can happen.
Like a drug becoming available to him that hes naive about, he doesn't understand how addictive it really is, and he gets hooked. It happens. I'm only recommending he tries to live clean, but maybe using MDMA every now and then sensibly will have some functional purpose in his life... maybe. Maybe it won't.
Ultimately at this point it doesn't seem like he can know untill he tries. Which goes along with the whole idea that learning who you are is more important than blindly throwing labels on yourself to avoid what you fear most. So against all professional advise, I DO actually advocate he tries. I feel much more wholesome telling him not to, but realistically he just appears that he HAS TO KNOW what type of person he is, almost more than he wants to get high. I know the point he's at and I can't tell him either way how it will end. But if it turns ugly, that will simply be the price he pays to know himself. So either way, realistically speaking, it can turn out good or bad. If I was the OP I'd simply ask myself "what do I REALLY want to do"? If he wants to go use MDMA than GO USE IT.
You will def figure out what kind of control you have with that specific drug. But I'd still recommend he stays away from things like meth/amphetamines (not methyldioxymethamphetamines), opiates, and barbituates. Sometimes it doesn't matter if you are or aren't a drug addict because a certain drug is so damn strong it will overtake almost everyone. All he can do is exercise his wisdom the best he can, and all we can REALLY DO is just wish him luck.

With that said.. good luck! I'm taking my arrogant ass out of here.
 
Top