mgrady3
Bluelighter
Can anyone comment on the pharmacological differences bewteen these two drugs (lunesta and ambien respectively)
I was assured by the pharmacist today that eszopiclone acts differently than zolpidem in the brain.
I was under the assumption that both drugs bind to the GABA-A receptor neurons.
The only difference being, in the paper I read, it states Zolpidem binds specifically to GABA-A_(alpha1), which is the sub receptor corresponding to sedation/hypnotic effects.
I didn't see the same statement about Eszoplicone, just that it binds to GABA-A. Yet, I would assume that since Eszopiclone is primarily sedative and a weak anxiolytic, that it can't have much binding for efficiency for the other alpha sub receptors.
Is there something inherently different in the way the two drugs behave in the brain or was the pharmacist just trying to convince me that the Lunesta would work. I had told her I had taken Ambien before and it did not help my insomnia at all.
I was assured by the pharmacist today that eszopiclone acts differently than zolpidem in the brain.
I was under the assumption that both drugs bind to the GABA-A receptor neurons.
The only difference being, in the paper I read, it states Zolpidem binds specifically to GABA-A_(alpha1), which is the sub receptor corresponding to sedation/hypnotic effects.
I didn't see the same statement about Eszoplicone, just that it binds to GABA-A. Yet, I would assume that since Eszopiclone is primarily sedative and a weak anxiolytic, that it can't have much binding for efficiency for the other alpha sub receptors.
Is there something inherently different in the way the two drugs behave in the brain or was the pharmacist just trying to convince me that the Lunesta would work. I had told her I had taken Ambien before and it did not help my insomnia at all.