✿Dai₷y✿
Bluelighter
We have a whole bunch of things to help filter out bots. Much of the spam you see on site is from real people sitting in low pay spam farms in India/Pakistan and Ukraine and churning out links spam.
As for pre-modding, it would be a massive overhead that staff wouldn't realistically be able to keep up with and that would prevent new users from asking/receiving timely answers to HR questions. It also wouldn't really help as the linkspammers keep evolving and have learnt to post 'good' posts for a while, and then go back and edit links back into their old posts weeks or even months later.
Meh, there will never be a spam proof place on the internet. Its not a big deal, the preventative measures are worse than the spam.
The amount of energy put into figuring out automatic ways to stop idiots selling cbd oil plus the ip checking (somewhat abused privilege imi), cloudfare making access too hard for people, all this stuff could be minimised.
There are a decent amount of of online roughly all the time. Only really need one online active to delete spam.
There are a lot of mods. I
What is stopping one that mods a forum A from deleting an obvious selking/sourcing bot/account in forum B?
I know its not the usual but it should be okay as these accounts are new, don't make it far and the post comes up on the what's new list.
There's no system invented that is comparable to a person manually reading the situation. Temp banning the spam does same thing as removing it , giving the upper people room to mop it up.
Not a big deal doing that, a few buttons pressed.
Outlier: there was a appeals area in a spot called "homeless threads". It was disposed of because the admin at the time saw it as being a "public spectacle".
It was a good idea then but will not be a good idea at all now imo.