Not so fast, my friend(s)....
- A regular season game has most/all seats sold to regular season ticket holders. You know, all those tailgators that travel in for the games on Saturday? My point stands that those who OWN the seats most likely would not travel in on a Tuesday night. That point made, I would concede that if the tickets were made available to non-boosters (as would be wise for a Tuesday night game), cities like Columbus would have no problems filling the stands.
- A city like Columbus would have no trouble filling the stands.....because it is Columbus. That is more a reflection on Buckeye fans than it is on Boise. You could go to a lot of places with a dense enough population to find people to fill the stands if tickets are made available. Like Gainesville, Norman, Lincoln, Blacksburg....places that have a dense population with plenty of 'fans' that don't have season tickets but love the team - no worries, stands are full. I'm still not sold that Boise has enough of that size of fan base 'in town'. As to "Boise was supposed to be a hardcore football empire with rabid fans" ... can anyone argue their success in recent years - recordwise or bowl wins? And I'm sure their fans are quite 'rabid' about the team, but not everyone in town is a fan, I'm willing to bet. I'm not even going to put places like Miami, LA, or other major metropolitan areas with a lot of 'other stuff to do' into this discussion.
- Lets back up to the statement and assess it for what it was:
There were EMPTY SEATS at the Boise game Tuesday night. I thought Boise was supposed to be a hardcore football empire with rabid fans. What the fuck else is there to do in Boise on a Tuesday Night. You have the #3 undefeated team on the National TV playing and there are empty seats?
PATHETIC!
I misread that as an answer to the thread question of having them #3, or my inferred reading of it as 'should Boise even be in the BCS conversation?'. So, I'm getting a bit bent on the 'attendance' remarks due to my misinterpretation of what it addressed. The statement is only that it was 'Pathetic'. I can't argue that, I can only point to MIA and nod in agreement. However, as it relates to the thread topic, attendance is wholly unrelated to rankings - performance is. Which brings us back on topic, and off of census bureau research.