Apologies for stereotyping - that much was wrong and was done more out of humour than anything. But my point still stands.
I did try to qualify it with the line "although I guess the topic is technically if you "could" do one thing, so feasibililty isn't an issue", because I didn't want to totally de-rail the thread. My attack is not meant to mean nobody should care, but I think people should focus their energys in useful ways. There's a difference between "making the world a better place" and "helping the world" - the former being more than possible, and the latter being virtually impossible unless you're one of the
extremely select few with the power to do anything substantial. Everyone seems to take "help the world" to mean "solve every problem that ever existed", and it just can't be done.
In the big picture, boycotting a companies products doesn't do shit. Neither does helping in a food shelter for homeless people. But in the small picture helping the homeless is extremely worthwhile, whereas boycotting companies products
still doesn't do shit. You're not going to solve the problem of homeless people by serving them food, but you can help them get by in the situation they're in. And you can even wear nike shoes while you do it.
I'd definitely love to hear anyone's
achievable thoughts on making the world a better place.