• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: deficiT | tryptakid | Foreigner

Conspiracy Theories (“Alternative Research”)

Here's a simple test...

Can you establish that any of this lingo has actually been found to be used by convicted pedophiles?

Can you establish that these code words in fact existed at all with these meanings before the start of the pizza gate theory?

I mean if the code words are a key part of the evidence, you gotta also establish that they are genuine code words used by genuine pedophiles for communication.

And no, just to be clear, you can't use anything related to pizza gate to establish this because that wouldn't show that the code words existed prior to the theory potentially making them up to begin with.

What would be ideal would be to use information that's come out from investigations and prosecutions of people involved in pedophile rings prior to pizza gate. But even people talking about it at all prior to pizza gate would help establish that it's true, in as much as it would establish that it wasn't made up as part of the pizza gate theory.
 
You guys have to do your own research. I told you what to look at. I'm not giving details further, but I know how these people are. Believe it or not, they are Luciferians who do evil things of that sort. That's not just a claim, that's a fact from much research. It goes way back.
 
CoastTwoCoast said:
You guys have to do your own research. I told you what to look at. I'm not giving details further, but I know how these people are. Believe it or not, they are Luciferians who do evil things of that sort. That's not just a claim, that's a fact from much research. It goes way back.
Click to expand...

No, that's not how this works.

I can't present you evidence showing that these code words didn't exist before pizza gate, that'd be proving a negative. Only the reverse can be shown.

I have already researched this more than I ever wanted to and came to the conclusion it's bullshit. But in the interests of fairness and discussion, I offered you the option to provide evidence.

Which should be easy if you've researched it to the point of being so convinced.

Now sure, you can elect not to present evidence. But why should anyone take your arguments seriously then? You're just saying shit with the admission that you have no evidence to present.

That's not gonna result in much discussion.

Telling people to Google it is just a waste of everyone's time. Because generally everyone already has. It's just some of us didn't come to your conclusion as a result.
 
I already know these people are pedophiles and satanists. It's easy to connect the dots. Didn't I say read the Podesta/Clinton emails? I've read the emails and the code makes plenty of sense. It's also connected to a pizza place that I'm not going to mention by name. There are deeper ties. It's not that Dojo pizza place mentioned on the other page. I don't know where they got that from. That place has nothing to do with it. I'm not going to lay out a bunch of evidence for you. I don't feel comfortable doing that. If you didn't come to the same conclusion as I did, that's fine.
 
Last edited:
i've asked you three times and you've chosen not to answer. i'm trying hard not to draw the obvious conclusion.

why won't you answer a simple question?

alasdair
 
I've ignored you because I've come to the conclusion it is absolutely pointless to attempt to discuss these things here. I will no longer do it...and you were obviously being a smart ass with that question.
 
You're right, you don't have to prove anything. You don't have to argue with us.

But then, why are you still posting? Like, I'm not saying you're not allowed to or anything. I just don't see why you'd bother if you're just gonna repeat the same thing again and again?

And yeah I'll admit I'm sometimes guilty of this too when I'm feeling nihilistic. I get feeling like it's pointless to even try. But generally if I'm not gonna make an argument, I might make one post, then just give up entirely. Not keep making the same argument with absolute commitment then just tell other people to Google it.
 
^ that's the irony.

i'm sorry i sound so snippy in these recent messages but it's extremely frustrating to be accused of being accused of refusing to listen by somebody so demonstrably refusing to listen.

alasdair
 
Anyone who actually researches it can find the truth. It didn't take me long at all to see how it's real and make the connections. So either you're taking the piss or doing really shitty research. I can't help that. I pointed you in the right direction.
 
There's another possibility.

We are seeing the same evidence, but evaluating it differently.

Different people do not evaluate the same evidence the same way, and there are better and worse ways to evaluate the same evidence.

And as have no way of proposing alternative explanations for your evidence, or explaining how your evaluation may be mistake, if you won't provide it.
 
indeed. this is just jgrimez all over again...

"i have looked at the data and drawn my own conclusion. my conclusion is the only correct conclusion. if you disagree with me you're blind, stupid, brainwashed, ignorant, etc."

:(

alasdair
 
alasdairm said:
indeed. this is just jgrimez all over again...

"i have looked at the data and drawn my own conclusion. my conclusion is the only correct conclusion. if you disagree with me you're blind, stupid, brainwashed, ignorant, etc."

:(

alasdair
Click to expand...

Nah, jgrimez usually shows evidence. Well, he links to YouTube and calls it evidence anyway.

Honestly I find coasttwocoasts approach far less frustrating.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top