• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: deficiT | tryptakid | Foreigner

Conspiracy Theories (“Alternative Research”)

Why do so many conspiracy theorists look like virgins? I'm not saying they are, just that they look like they are.

Also, is the conspiracy theory that conspiracy theorists are virgins a popular belief among conspiracy theorist?
 
JGrimez said:
You'd never comment on anything he actually SAYS. Knee-jerk response is discredit and ridicule.
Click to expand...

I was discrediting your description, not him. He won an Emmy, which I mentioned.

However, since you asked, after watching him spaz out and hearing him say the words “red pill”, I was laughing so hard I couldn’t really hear. (That was really early in.) I thought it was a complete waste of time just hearing that much.

Btw, I know it can be a pain, but please try to post a little more about what the video is about and why it matters.

It’s to encourage discussion, and win hearts and minds.
 
JGrimez said:
A former prosecutor weighs in:

Click to expand...


How about YOU weigh in.

Ill admit I think many of your arguments are poorly thought out, but I for one would rather hear even the worst thought out argument of yours than the best presented argument of some guy on YouTube.

Speaking only for myself, I can tell you that even if I don't reply, I nearly always read your posts. Whereas I never watch any of the YouTube links you put up. Or anyone else's for that matter. I just hate this modern style of arguing with memes and YouTube links rather than conservation.
 
That's a shame, I appreciate when people share useful information with me.

That's how I've learned so much and refuse to rely on the MSM for accurate info.
 
JGrimez said:
That's a shame, I appreciate when people share useful information with me.

That's how I've learned so much and refuse to rely on the MSM for accurate info.
Click to expand...

I certainly can't begrude you for taking anything the mainstream media says with an enormous amount of skepticism. I just hope you remain as vigilant and skeptical of other sources of information.

No ones saying (or at least I'm not saying) that you can't use YouTube to inform your views, just that I think it's not very realistic to argue or discuss things with YouTube videos. They're generally not in themselves evidence of anything. They're usually the arguments and opinions of someone who's not actually here to discuss them. That's the main issue I have with them.

I have a similar belief about Wikipedia. I think it can be an excellent way to track down and uncover authoritive information, but it isn't itself an authoritive source. Likewise content on YouTube can explain and direct people to information and provide interpretations, but isn't authoritive in itself.
 
Last edited:
osociety.org

In the Reality-Based World, Russia-gate is Dead. In the World of Political Theater, it is Still the New 42

by Craig Murray edited by O Society August 12, 2019 Douglas Adams famously suggested the answer to life, the universe and everything is 42. In the world of the political elite, the answer is Russia…
osociety.org osociety.org
In a lawsuit brought by the Democratic National Committee against Russia and against WikiLeaks, and against inter alia Donald Trump Jr, Jared Kushner, Paul Manafort and Julian Assange, for the first time the claims of collusion between Trump and Russia were subjected to actual scrutiny in a court of law. And Judge Koeltl concluded that, quite simply, the claims made as the basis of Russiagate are insufficient to even warrant a hearing.
Click to expand...
 
w01fg4ng said:
You couldn't pay me to watch that virgin for 25 minutes.
Click to expand...

I don't think you could comprehend the core of what he's actually saying.

An intelligent person who disagrees would watch something and then explain why they disagree with it. I've done this numerous times when someone has linked me to a video of someone else talking. I personally like to hear what other people are saying, especially ones with substantial followings (from all sides).

I try to understand why some people have such an aversion to watching people speak on YouTube. My conclusions is that they are generally radical Leftists; so they ignore tech censorship and underestimate the importance of YouTube political commentary, and they generally refuse to engage in debate with a side that can easily pick apart their arguments and make them look ignorant.

Those types generally resort to ad homs and ridicule, a natural defense against having to think and justify stances beyond a surface level.
 
JessFR said:
Out of curiosity, am I a radical leftist? :)
Click to expand...
Apart from being pro-gun you seem to follow their script.
You will not go deep and engage content or threads that you perceive as dangerous to your worldview.
You will consistently ad-hom and bizarrely type out pseudo-psychoanalytical rants about someone instead of engaging with what they are saying or looking at evidence.
It's your way of attempting to place someone below you intellectually and to discredit them by trying to explain how they cannot think properly. I consider it ironic projection.
Anyway I don't like having these personal tiffs with you (or anybody) but I am rarely the person instigating them. I don't need to, I have more than enough evidence and logical arguments to back up my claims. There's no need to get personal with someone unless you're deflecting.

Back on-topic:

Also considered "conspiracy theory" by many, mind control experimentation by the authorities has been rumored for decades. We've even found official documentation like in the case of MK-ULTRA. Here are victims claiming radiation/drug/mind control experiments who are testifying before the President's Advisory Committee (first testimony @ 5:40)

 
Last edited:
Captain.Heroin said:
MK ULTRA is obviously very real and I won't doubt that JG.
Click to expand...

Do you think it's possible that that type of covert government experimentation still exists and could be used to influence victims to carry out mass shootings?
 
JGrimez said:
Do you think it's possible that that type of covert government experimentation still exists and could be used to influence victims to carry out mass shootings?
Click to expand...
No, definitely not IMO. The "target" was truth/information, until they had unpublished but well-understood results that this was intangible, impossible for philosophical reasons and more, and the aim slowly turned to pushing the limits of a human being. They also probably discovered resiliency of people as well.

If anything I think we're having less black sites/etc over time and are not going to have as many gov't programs of this nature. We fell in love with old-fashioned warfare and are pushing the limits on that instead.

Would it be surprising to learn things like this were on-going? Not at all? But I would bet against it in this day/age for now. Way more precedence/money to be made in continuing overseas wars that we all know are running. Was it a fair question? Sure. It's important to keep an open mind about many ongoing events and I think it's important to remain objective and open-ended in analyzing things like this.
 
This is extremely important and a must-watch.

In 1988, CIA agent Mark Phillips rescued Cathy O'Brien from the MK-ULTRA program. They provided documented testimony for the US House of Representatives Select Committee on Intelligence Oversight in 1995. But for reasons of national security, she was not able to address a Congressional Committee. So she became a whistleblower:
Click to expand...

She makes explosive allegations about the Clintons and was willing to do so under oath. What would be the motive there? To endanger her life and risk incarceration due to purgery?
Should we believe victims? Even if they incriminate people that we consider good?

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top