• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: deficiT | tryptakid | Foreigner

Conspiracy Theories (“Alternative Research”)

SmokinBuddha said:
Not even there anymore. Look at the former owner of the L.A. Clippers. He was stripped of his team by the NBA because he had the audacity to utter that word in the privacy of his own home. I don't agree with using that word either but when you're "policed" for any language you use in the privacy of your own home that doesn't involve an actual crime, well that's something everyone should be concerned about.
Click to expand...
guess it wasn't private then if someone heard him say it? lol

also, I wouldn't consider what happened to him as being "policed" in any way, just cause and effect

I hate cancel culture, I truly do, but I hate racism more. Calling someone out for being racist who employs black people (when they have direct evidence) isn't cancel culture in my eyes. It's the appropriate response.

Some billionaire had to sell his basketball team because he's racist? I just might shed a tear :'(

Dog the Bounty Hunter being cancelled for saying N word... when he literally chases down black people to arrest them? That's not some conflict of interest?
 
Negentropic said:
guess it wasn't private then if someone heard him say it? lol

also, I wouldn't consider what happened to him as being "policed" in any way, just cause and effect

I hate cancel culture, I truly do, but I hate racism more. Calling someone out for being racist who employs black people (when they have direct evidence) isn't cancel culture in my eyes. It's the appropriate response.

Some billionaire had to sell his basketball team because he's racist? I just might shed a tear :'(

Dog the Bounty Hunter being cancelled for saying N word... when he literally chases down black people to arrest them? That's not some conflict of interest?
Click to expand...
the way I see it, all the fuzz about cancel culture is mostly racist assholes and the likes being angry that they get called out for being just that. it was just that back in the days it was just normal to say racist, sexist, homophobe,.... shit all the time.
 
Negentropic said:
guess it wasn't private then if someone heard him say it? lol

also, I wouldn't consider what happened to him as being "policed" in any way, just cause and effect

I hate cancel culture, I truly do, but I hate racism more. Calling someone out for being racist who employs black people (when they have direct evidence) isn't cancel culture in my eyes. It's the appropriate response.

Some billionaire had to sell his basketball team because he's racist? I just might shed a tear :'(

Dog the Bounty Hunter being cancelled for saying N word... when he literally chases down black people to arrest them? That's not some conflict of interest?
Click to expand...
Yeah, but those "cause and effect" rules don't work the other way, do they. Remember Roseanne? She sent an off colour, mildly racist tweet to an individual and her career is over as a result. Nick Cannon OTOH, publicly went off on a nazi-esque rant about Whites and Jews, channeling his inner Hitler as he spewed the same racist dreck about Whites and Jews as Hitler did about Jews and Slavs. He was fired by CBS/Viacom but Oprah offered her network for him to work at. Reruns of his show are still being broadcast on Canadian TV and his career wasn't ruined.
Meanwhile in Canada, the founder of BLM Toronto has a history of publicly channeling her inner Hitler towards White people. Subhuman defects was one term she liked to bandy about. This stupid country actually gave her a Women in Leadership award. Her name is Yusra Khogali if you want to check it out.

So to sum up, suggesting a Black person looks like a gorilla (as per Roseanne's tweet) is incredibly racist and needs to be dealt with, harshly. But outright stating that ALL White people are subhuman defects is award winning leadership.
 
here you go @JGrimez

you'll have to point me to the pizzagate thread you've been requesting - i found one but it wasn't started by you - is that the one you want?
 
It's not that I truly believe that conspiracy theorists control the world--- they couldn't, since there are so many conflicting theories floating around.
I am saying that the mentality that leads to conspiracy theories seems to dominate the world:
"The (insert enemy of choice) are evil, powerful, out to get us, and they don't fight fair."
This kind of thinking is exactly what's wrong with the world today.
 
jasperkent said:
Really?
The world is controlled by conspiracy theorists and the state of the world is good?
Click to expand...
No,
but it's a bit like Plato's Republic, controlled by philosophers...
it would be better controlled by conspiracy theorists than by banking families, that's for sure,
maybe some semi-innocent people would die as being falsely accused of "reptilians" but probably those people would surely be not so good to begin with ..
 
jasperkent said:
The (insert enemy of choice) are evil, powerful, out to get us, and they don't fight fair."
This kind of thinking is exactly what's wrong with the world today
Click to expand...
I don't know...
if you consider that having billions of dollars/yens/euros, controlling companies that move thousands of people, controlling politicians through blackmail, performing sexual rites with children and sometimes killing them (don't say it doesn't happen because it DOES happen, you only have to study the DUTROUX CASE) getting together in groups with little transparency, putting their real money in offshore accounts that nobody can access... and protecting themselves among themselves...
if you don't consider that coherent with the conspiracy mentality... and you think it's "playing fair", well, that's up to you.
not to talk about a definite worldwide Agenda which is clearly not for our benefit.
 
Syrian rue can be dangerous when used incorrectly, and I would be extremely cautious in using it for diabetes or any other physical health condition.

@Neuroborean Not to invalidate your experience, but do you think that it is possible that you just coincidentally found out you were diabetic shortly after getting the MMR vaccine?

Many conditions tend to show up around the age that the MMR vaccine is given, hence the (heavily debunked) MMR vaccine and autism theory of the early 2000s ala Andrew Wakefield.

Here is a lengthy and extremely detailed video debunking that theory if you are interested in learning more:


edit: moved from PD.
 
Last edited:
arrall said:
do you think that it is possible that you just coincidentally found out you were diabetic shortly after getting the MMR vaccine?
Click to expand...
I don't know if you read that message of mine completely, there's contradictory studies/papers about the stuff, I trust more those ones that point towards MMR vaccine being one of the possible causes because we already know that there's a direct connection between mumps and diabetes, as a viral culprit that creates an immune dysregulation, ending up in autoimmune reactions. Even if it's an attenuated vaccine, if the body is under stress and you inject someone with 3 different stuff that create different antigens, the immune overload is likely to happen.

Of course I think it's "possible" that is just coincidental, but I don't think it is, it's also possible that tomorrow the Sun will go off, because of whatever natural law that we don't know about...

In my message I also stated that I wouldn't use syrian rue itself, neither the typical 50/50 extract but only the 100% harmine extraction, that I need to buy, or learn how to produce.
 
Last edited:
arrall said:
Here is a lengthy and extremely detailed video debunking that theory if you are interested in learning more
Click to expand...
I think when someone "debunks" whatever they need to propose an alternative explanation, not saying it's idiopathic (as many people do, I don't know about the video, couldn't see it yet). There's something to be explained: why autism is more normal nowadays than it was in the past? for me people saying it's "complex" or it's environmental causes + genetic factors it's almost the same as saying it's "idiopathic". They should say instead: we don't really know but we would consider all possible causes, including vaccines" That would be a honest answer, but I don't consider Academy to be interested in truth and real research, most times due to lobby/investors interests (and ideological/political interests in social sciences).
 
Neuroborean said:
I think when someone "debunks" whatever they need to propose an alternative explanation, not saying it's idiopathic (as many people do, I don't know about the video, couldn't see it yet). There's something to be explained: why autism is more normal nowadays than it was in the past? for me people saying it's "complex" or it's environmental causes + genetic factors it's almost the same as saying it's "idiopathic". They should say instead: we don't really know but we would consider all possible causes, including vaccines" That would be a honest answer, but I don't consider Academy to be interested in truth and real research, most times due to lobby/investors interests (and ideological/political interests in social sciences).
Click to expand...
Well the alternative explanation is:
1. Autism shows up generally within months of the recommended MMR vaccination age
2. Autism was previously severely underdiagnosed, and still is in women.
 
Look at all this research disproving vaccines causing autism in children... including one that showed data suggesting unvaccinated children had higher rates of autism :shrug:

Of course, it's obviously corrupt pharma companies making bogus studies with fake research, right?

www.verywellhealth.com

Worried About Vaccines? Unvaccinated Children Can Have Autism, Too

Since some people still push the false idea that vaccines cause autism, they are often surprised to read about unvaccinated children with autism.
www.verywellhealth.com www.verywellhealth.com

Numerous studies have been done comparing autism rates between vaccinated and unvaccinated children. No difference has been found.

One study from Japan looked at the MMR vaccine, which was withdrawn from the country due to concerns about aseptic meningitis. In that study, a statistically significant number of children were found to have developed autism even though they had not received the MMR vaccine.7

Another study published in the February 2014 issue of the journal Autism found, "the rates of autism spectrum disorder diagnosis did not differ between immunized and non-immunized younger sib groups."8

One 2018 study reported in JAMA Pediatrics aimed to determine vaccination patterns of children with and without autism, as well as those of their younger siblings.9

The researchers determined that the children who had autism and their younger siblings had higher rates of being un- or under-vaccinated.

This, the study authors note, suggests that these children are at higher risk for vaccine-preventable diseases. So, while there is no proven benefit of avoiding vaccines in terms of autism prevention, this research highlights a proven danger of doing so.9
 
i want to write something pithy now like "you can lead a horse to water, but you can't make them drink"

now drink the fuck up motherfuckers. play time is over.

either drink the kool-aid or spill the fucking tea, you choose.
 
Look guys, you're making me think about quitting BLUELIGHT, moving a post into "conspiracies", just because of what?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top