JGrimez
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2018
- Messages
- 5,495
Apparently it isn't as it's conducted cleverly to catch them out. I'm sure it's beatable though by the most cunning. Hopefully identification can become better over time (brain scans perhaps?)
Conspiracy Theories (“Alternative Research”)
- Thread starter JGrimez
- Start date
Apparently it isn't as it's conducted cleverly to catch them out. I'm sure it's beatable though by the most cunning. Hopefully identification can become better over time (brain scans perhaps?)
SunriseChampion
Bluelighter
Oh, most definitely!!
Our lack of seriousness in regards to climate change. Our destruction of the natural world. Our turning a blind eye to the concentration camps in China in order to keep our cheap goods flowing. The American prison industry.
Continuing slavery, mostly in the Arab world.
Whatever the hell American healthcare is supposed to be....care for the wealthy, I guess.
Massive income inequalities.
Tax dodging billionaires.
Flat-earthers.
Our drugs policies.
Factory farming.
Reality TV and social media.
This list could go on for some time, eh?
SunriseChampion
Bluelighter
sekio
Bluelight Crew
Disclaimer to avert a shit-fit: none of the following is intended as a personal attack.
Are you serious about this? As I understood it, "JEWS DID WTC"was nothing more than a clever prank of sorts, conducted by the infamous GNAA. They even managed to get some CNN reporters to discuss said JEWS who DID WTC. Nice trolling, guys, but minus several million points for good taste, hm?
Why would they do that? Any independent researcher wirh suitable patience and instrumentation would be able to prove or disprove that statement quite easily. And it seems like a bit of a faux pas to basically sabotage your product with bad PR simply to put harmful shit into it for the same of being mean. The pharma higher-ups may be greedy, but they also seem to want to keep as clean an image as possible, and I wouldn't pin them as people who want to make shit harder for themselves.
I also find it very hard to discount this strannge correlation: rather than an improvement in hygeine causing reduction in many different infections and an increase in the public health, the major diseases disappeared one after the other. Initially smallpox became less of an issue (around the discovery of variolization, i.e. a crude early form of a vaccine), then as the years passed and other vaccines were devloped and introduced, the diseases dropped off one after the other.
I guess you could always say that it's coincidence, or look for whatever other factors, but to me I see a direct association: people get vaccinated, disease disappears. Simple enough, and the underlying logic is sound.
Just because there are a very small number of fatalities after vaccination (devil's advocate: How can you be sure the vaccination directly caused death, and it's not coincidence?) does not mean they are overall harmful.
Have you ever hard of Stevens-Johnsons syndrome? It's an incredibly rare condition, also incredibly unpleasant and potentially lethal, which can be triggered in some people by administration of any of a wide variety of pharmaceuticals: There's no rhyme or reason to what can cause it: I count more than 20 agents on the Wikipedia page, including penicillin, ibuprofen, barbiturates, valproiic acid, even acetaminophen is considered a possible risk factor.
Does this mean that we should avoid using all of those (remarkabluy useful) pharmaceuticals? I would argue that doing so would be ridiculous and would hamstring the medical field.
Food for thought as well: an increase of 200 ppm in atmospheric Co2 may seem like nothing at all, but whenyou multiply 200 ppm by the violume of the Earth's atmosphere, that equates to an impressive amount of CO2 that has appeared these last few hundred years.
Maybe we were educated in graph reading differently, but the data I see (namely from Environment Canada, NOAA, and/or NASA) is indicative of a rise in temperatures pretty much across the board. I do have some faith in humanity left after all. Maybe an organization like NASA would fuck up, but if they did so knowingly they'd strive to correct the error and provide acccurate data. I do have some faith in some parts of the government - I wouldn't be able to function if every government and every corporation are automatically assumed to be lying about whatever or have ulterior motives. Yes, there are shitty people and liars, and yes they do end up in positions of trust and power, but statsistically having a totally homogenous composition of assholes in any group of moderate size is not very likely at all.
Are you serious about this? As I understood it, "JEWS DID WTC"was nothing more than a clever prank of sorts, conducted by the infamous GNAA. They even managed to get some CNN reporters to discuss said JEWS who DID WTC. Nice trolling, guys, but minus several million points for good taste, hm?
Why would they do that? Any independent researcher wirh suitable patience and instrumentation would be able to prove or disprove that statement quite easily. And it seems like a bit of a faux pas to basically sabotage your product with bad PR simply to put harmful shit into it for the same of being mean. The pharma higher-ups may be greedy, but they also seem to want to keep as clean an image as possible, and I wouldn't pin them as people who want to make shit harder for themselves.
I also find it very hard to discount this strannge correlation: rather than an improvement in hygeine causing reduction in many different infections and an increase in the public health, the major diseases disappeared one after the other. Initially smallpox became less of an issue (around the discovery of variolization, i.e. a crude early form of a vaccine), then as the years passed and other vaccines were devloped and introduced, the diseases dropped off one after the other.
I guess you could always say that it's coincidence, or look for whatever other factors, but to me I see a direct association: people get vaccinated, disease disappears. Simple enough, and the underlying logic is sound.
The package insert for most pohamraceutical products is similar - it's basically ass-covering with a smidgen of some useful data.
Just because there are a very small number of fatalities after vaccination (devil's advocate: How can you be sure the vaccination directly caused death, and it's not coincidence?) does not mean they are overall harmful.
Have you ever hard of Stevens-Johnsons syndrome? It's an incredibly rare condition, also incredibly unpleasant and potentially lethal, which can be triggered in some people by administration of any of a wide variety of pharmaceuticals: There's no rhyme or reason to what can cause it: I count more than 20 agents on the Wikipedia page, including penicillin, ibuprofen, barbiturates, valproiic acid, even acetaminophen is considered a possible risk factor.
Does this mean that we should avoid using all of those (remarkabluy useful) pharmaceuticals? I would argue that doing so would be ridiculous and would hamstring the medical field.
Are you unaware iof CO2's well established properties as both a thermal insulator and an absorberr of infrared? It's easy to demonstrate (and is a statment of fact, as I see it) that adding CO2 to a controlled atmosphere in a pressure chamber will encourage retention of heat. Why would it do so on a small scale, but not do soon a larger scale?
Food for thought as well: an increase of 200 ppm in atmospheric Co2 may seem like nothing at all, but whenyou multiply 200 ppm by the violume of the Earth's atmosphere, that equates to an impressive amount of CO2 that has appeared these last few hundred years.
Maybe we were educated in graph reading differently, but the data I see (namely from Environment Canada, NOAA, and/or NASA) is indicative of a rise in temperatures pretty much across the board. I do have some faith in humanity left after all. Maybe an organization like NASA would fuck up, but if they did so knowingly they'd strive to correct the error and provide acccurate data. I do have some faith in some parts of the government - I wouldn't be able to function if every government and every corporation are automatically assumed to be lying about whatever or have ulterior motives. Yes, there are shitty people and liars, and yes they do end up in positions of trust and power, but statsistically having a totally homogenous composition of assholes in any group of moderate size is not very likely at all.
JGrimez
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2018
- Messages
- 5,495
Jews do not equal Israel do not equal Zionists. It's disingenuous to conflate the two in order to debunk facts. You can start by looking at the police reports of the 'dancing Israelis' who were working for a Mossad front known as Urban Moving Systems. Seems you need to do more research. And no I wouldn't joke about something as serious as this. I've lost close friends over speaking the truth and I completely understand why.
Plenty of reasons once you understand psychopathic agendas. Understanding that governments aren't attempting to improve our health (but in fact quite the opposite) is a good start. Plenty of examples across a wide range of industries and government policies.
Just ignore all the vaccine injuries including the fact that vaccine-strain polio injuries are now greater than wild polio. So yeah you're just repeating assumptions while ignoring evidence that counters this claim. If something does more harm than good then a rational, unbiased person may sit up and change their mind. However I think this is one of your (and many others') "sacred cows" namely that vaccines are safe and effective. It's not this claim that's difficult to believe, it's that elites are aware of this and have managed to hoodwink so many medical professionals. I get it.
It means that people should be informed of the actual risks and then given their own choice. If you disagree then you're a medical fascist who also ignores all the medical professionals who agree with me. It's a human right to resist being 'medicated' by the state.
The Earth's atmosphere is not a backyard greenhouse.
Again correlation. And you'd have to first even prove that higher CO2 concentrations is in fact a negative thing.
Or to put it another way, you're suggesting that adding 0.014% of gas to the total greenhouse gases is significantly affecting the earth's climate. Even by looking at historical data, CO2 follows temperature changes, not precedes it. This wild claim that CO2 levels is somehow a control knob for global temperature has not been proven. Claiming it is is an appeal to authority and authorities that have been caught consistently lying and manipulating data (Climategate, Mann vs Ball etc). The climate change agenda is one of the most powerful and highly politicized in the world.
Are you aware that Mann's hockey stick graph was fabricated? What do you think of that graph? Is it smart to base your beliefs on manipulated data? That's what the UN did and I assume you trust them. Go have a scroll through Ned Nokolov PhD's Twitter to see some evidence that you've probably never seen in your life (definitely not from the mainstream). Also check out the NASA study which shows increased CO2 is greening the Earth. What level of CO2 is too low whereby all life will die? What's the ideal level of CO2? What's the ideal temperature for the Earth? Difficult questions (I actually hope it's warming as opposed to cooling).
Putting faith in government institutions seems crazy to me. They should be the most scrutinized at all times. Political agendas constantly override unbiased science.
Welcome to my world. You'll be fine. Join the club. Doesn't mean I think "everything is fake" but a healthy dose of skepticism is required, especially considering track records and conflicts of interest.
To me this shows an ignorance of political and corporate psychopathy. Rising up the ranks and compartmentalizaton is all that is needed to enact psychopathic agendas and to spread evil on a macrosocial level. For some further reading.
sekio
Bluelight Crew
I've heard the story. Frankly I don't know what to make of it. I don't view it as proof towards Israeli involvement in the 9/11 plot though.
Maybe it's due to being a Canadian, but in my experience, our government can be a byzantine bueraucracy, but most people involved in day-to-day functioning do take at least a little pride in their work. I know people who work in the Federal government as well as the administrative staff of one of the universities here, and they describe a similar picture. I would absolutely believe it's a different scenario "south of the border" though.
Isn't that what you'd expect? A related thing happens when you attempt to test for infrequent conditions with a test that has less than perfect accuracy: most of the positives will be false positives. And a crude form of ethical calculus suggests that in a tradeoff between the return of viral polio, and a small but nonzero amount of polio vaccine reactions, the reactions are undouibtedly less harmful to fewer people, overall.
The WHO rates of any negative reaction to a vaccine are suprisingly low: 1 per 2 million cases. Here in Canada we monitor the incidence of vaccine neagtive reactions and publish the data. The figures for 2018 show that, between every single vaccne administered in a calendar year there are only about 250 serious reactions total. Counting even realtively mild reactions like skin irritation, rash, pain at the injection site etc gives a worst case number of about 3000 cases, The yearly birth rate in Canada is 385,000 surviving children per year. If we are super pessimistic and assume only 1/4 of them are vaccinated every year (a gross undersimplification I think), the rate of mild reactions is 3 percent, severe lethal reactions 0.25%. That number is an absolute worst case, mind you, but still looks superior to the rate of complications someone would experience if they had whooping cough.
Out of my peer group and extended family (and thirty or so of my elementary school classmates - school children generally are given meningitis and Hepatitis B vaccines in grade 4 here in Canada. You can opt out but it is generally accepted as nothing to be concerned over.) I can't say I have met personally anyone who has experienced a negative response to vaccination, beyond one girl in high school with a fear of needles, who had a panic attack. I am also thankful that nobody in my social circles has suffered whooping cough, or measles, or any number of the other nasties. And a very entertaining Maltese woman who lives in my building actually recieved BCG vaccine as an immunotherapy for bladder cancer - as far as the we can tell she's doing much better now, so I can actually proivide a concrete example of vaccines doing some good. My mother had actually suffered tuberculosis as a child and survived - between that and an education in virology/genetics she is very confident in the beneficial effect of vaccination.
So it's not a sacred cow belief as I understand it. I figure between my personal observations and experiences, the established mechanism of vaccines and how they prime the immune system, and a little bit of trust in humanity, I am personally in favour of vaccinating children reasonably quickly. I don't exactly trust the brain of a 6 year old to be able to make a learned judgement about the risks, and know from experience some people will opt out simply 'cause they don't want to get poked with a scary needle. Between my two brothers and I, none of us have any complaints nor regrets of being vaccinated as children. I'm sure if I were aware of multiple cases of death or other awful consequence from vaccinations occuring on the regular, I'd think otherwise.
I checked out Vaxxed too. After I realized that Wakefield himself was behind the production I suddenly lost all interest. You discount governmental statements - I tend to reject statements from profiteering fearmongers who were struck off the medical register. Turnabout is fair play, right?
I would argue it's the backyard greenhouse, the most important one we have actually. What makes you so certain that it cannot be modeled?
I don't think I ever made the claim that CO2 is the sole factor causing global warming. That's an oversimplification of course - there are a multitude of factors that play into the maintenance of a steady state in the enviroment, CO2 levels being only one factor. There are different sources and sinks for CO2, diffusion takes time to move CO2 across global distances, and also factors like clouds, greenery, and polar ice will alter the surface albedo, and change the temerature somehow. James Lovelock and his Gaia hypothesis, while a little hokey, are an interesting way to view the Earth's dynamics, SimEarth is a useful little toy to play with too...
I was also well aware of CO2's effect on plant growth. I've met farmers of both marijuana as well as other greenhouse plants that actually vent the furnace flue gases directly into the greenhouses, providing both heating in the winter months, and elevated levels of the limiting resource needed in plant growth. I think it's up int he air (pardon the pun) whether or not that will counteract the insulatory effect of CO2.
Where did I claim that CO2 causes instantaneous temperature increase? It's like adding a winter coat as an extra layer if you are cold: the application of the coat doesn't raise the temperatures directly, it simply reduces heat loss from your core, and will take some time to reflect an appropriate amount of heat to warm you up fully. Now factor in the humongous volume of the global atmosphere, and the relatively long time it takes for total mixing of gases in one area, and the effects of smoothing on the ice-core temperture data... doesn't seem that strange to me.
Like I keep saying, it's elementary physics to demonstrate CO2 has an effect as an insulator. Why would this property disappear on a larger scale? Would you also discount the insulatory effect of other gases with much stronger insulating effects, like nitrous oxide or Halon/Freons?
And out of curiosity, what do you consider to be evidence that proves a causal relationship? You don't seem to be a very stong believer in determinism.
I was aware of that, actually. I never referenced it or mentioned it for that reason. There's other graphs done by other people, drawn with data from other sourcers too. Is the implication that there are no data sources you would consider trustworthy enough to use? Because most sources I check (off the top of my head, Environment Canada, NOAA, NASA, historical records of weather station observations, and even things like my friend's amateur temerature logger constructed from an Arduino), all show a rise in global temperatures. Not a catastrophic one, but definitely measurable. Occam's razor says it's more likely that the temperatures are accurrate, than the alternative, which would be all of these suppsedly independent organizations all basically coming up with the same incorrect data. For all the good it'll do, Wikipedia and a selection of other sites are confident enough to declsre a general consensus that the Earth is warming. There was a review paper which checked a truly absurd number of published studies on temperature (on the order of several thousand) and the agreement was that temperatures have gone up.
I think what you would consider healthy skepticism, I would view as a chronic distrust of authority. I am definitely not as quick to shoot down publications by research organizations or even the portions of government that actually focus on scientific methodology just bevause they came from an authority. That's the opposite of the meaning of the word "authority" as I understand it.
I hate the phrase, but maybe we will have to agree to disagree... thank you for an engaging discussion, even if we can't seem to agree on anything at all. It's an opportunity for me to write more, which I'm finding myself doing a lot of...
Last edited:
JGrimez
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2018
- Messages
- 5,495
It's one strong piece of the puzzle. There was also a lot of insider trading that went on right before the attacks, like some big trades shorting the airlines. A few studies were done that showed, based on previous trading behavior, it was not possible for some of these trades to have been made without some kind of foreknowledge. I was only made aware of this a few months ago The way that the authorities swept this under the rug was by saying something like "no perpetrators of the attack were shown to have any links to any insider trading". Well ok that would be true if they were lying about who perpetrated the attacks. You'd think all that insider trading would warrant a thorough investigation?
Compartmentalization. The average person is a good person just doing their job trying not to f**k anyone else over, even government employees. However the higher one rises the more corruption they encounter and the more power they accrue the more likely they are to be accosted or compromised.
If you genuinely care about the issue and refuse to watch a video like this in its entirety objectively then yes I would claim it is a sacred cow of yours. The Irrefutable Argument Against Vaccine Safety - with Author Del Bigtree (or at the very least watch VAXXED)
I don't understand why you're making this terrible argument. You're advocating for taking away the choice of a parent to medicate their child and you're also going against the many health professionals who are speaking out against vaccines. This is the type of thinking that I constantly ridicule and criticize because imo it's bordering on ignorant fascism and supportive of child abuse. You might be wrong but you are arrogantly refusing to admit that at the expense of the health (or life) of another person's child.
So far the global warming alarmists' models have been widely inaccurate. If this were the early to mid-90's you'd be repeating what the IPCC were saying. Now we're in 2020 looking back at their predictions and should be scratching our heads and showing extreme skepticism but some of are continuing to believe them and their models.
I notice you left out the sun which is why I think you've been propagandized and are unwilling to objectively assess opposing arguments.
CO2 makes up 3% of the greenhouse gases. Manmade contributions is a fraction of that. 97% is water vapour which we can do nothing about. While clouds/albedo do have a lot to do with the process - the primary driver of climate - by far - OBVIOUSLY - is solar activity. If a 'science-backed' source of media tries to downplay this then you can be sure they're being deceptive about climate change (and there are a lot of people being deceptive about climate change).
Yeah but you're getting information from institutions who were promoting this guy and his fraudulent graph.
Well Obama repeated the claim by cartoonist John Cook that "97% of scientists agree with anthropogenic global warming" or something like that. But that claim turned out to also be false based on the disingenuous way that Cook was interpreting the results of studies. Turns out it was close to 3% some sources say less than 1%. I posted a TON of science in the Anthropogenic Climate Change thread. Again if you genuinely care you can peruse that and see valid opposing arguments from credible scientists. But I'm done wasting time arguing this with someone who is unwilling to alter their point of view.
Yes sounds good.
JGrimez
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2018
- Messages
- 5,495
How Much Money Do Pediatricians Really Make From Vaccines?
How Much Money Do Pediatricians Really Make From Vaccines?
After a reader sent us a link to a PDF file of Blue Cross Blue Shield’s Physician Incentive Program available online, Wellness & Equality learned that insurance companies pay pediatricians massive bonuses based on the percentage of children who are fully vaccinated by age 2.
threadreaderapp.com
How Much Money Do Pediatricians Really Make From Vaccines?
After a reader sent us a link to a PDF file of Blue Cross Blue Shield’s Physician Incentive Program available online, Wellness & Equality learned that insurance companies pay pediatricians massive bonuses based on the percentage of children who are fully vaccinated by age 2.
Thread by @jonrappoport: "These "toddler suddenly gets limp arm leg droopy face" stories (acute flaccid myelitis ) are going to bubble-burst once one irate Mother […]" #AFM #CDCWhistleblower #Vaxxed #flu
Thread by @jonrappoport: "These "toddler suddenly gets limp arm leg droopy face" stories (acute flaccid myelitis ) are going to bubble-burst op talking about her child's vaccines and/or one Nurse and/or one leaks t […]" #AFM #CDCWhistleblower #Vaxxed #flu
threadreaderapp.com
Last edited:
JGrimez
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2018
- Messages
- 5,495
Could this be the tech they'd like to implement?
news.mit.edu
Storing medical information below the skin’s surface
MIT researchers have developed a novel way to record a patient’s vaccination history: storing the data in a pattern of quantum-dot dye, invisible to the naked eye, that is delivered under the skin at the same time as the vaccine.
news.mit.edu
nuttynutskin
Bluelighter
- Joined
- May 15, 2011
- Messages
- 10,732
From a Facebook post...
**WARNING FOR PEOPLE WITH COVID-19 PLEASE SHARE***
My moms friend, her husband and daughter where all diagnosed with COVID-19 out of the 3 the Husband was hospitalized. The wife asked the husband to let her know if they try to put him on a ventilator and to absolutely not let them put him on one. He has been at Parkland for a week or so. A couple of days ago the wife gets a call from her husbands nurse. She called attempting to get authorization to put her husband on a ventilator. unaware that the wife had spoke with her husband(the patient) 2 hours prior to getting the call from the nurse. My moms friend stated that her husband was getting better the hospital even decreased his oxygen use. so when the nurse called it didnt make sense. The wife worries and in disbelief said she would not authorize it. How the hell was he fine earlier and then 2 hours later in such a bad shape that he needed a ventilator? the nurse explained Covid can suddenly worsen in a couple of hours. The nurse insisted she give approval, the wife kept saying no, she even was given 3 minutes to make a decision. The nurse said she Doctor needed to know ASAP. She asked the nurse to speak to her husband and the nurse said he was in such bad shape that it was impossible. She insisted she speak to her husband again and the nurse kept saying she could not as he was in critical condition. Luckily the wife had left her husband a cell phone and she was able to call him. Franticly she called and spoke to him, he answered the phone calmly explaining he was doing great and had no idea what was going on or why the nurse would've called her stating that he was in such a bad state. My question is, what is really going on? are people getting better and getting killed to get money from the state? what would've happened had she given consent? its so many questions. if y'all know anyone who has this please don't believe everything the doctors or nurses say. Make sure your people are ok. Do exactly what she did and leave them access to a phone if possible. Its time we wake up they are killing us for money.
**WARNING FOR PEOPLE WITH COVID-19 PLEASE SHARE***
My moms friend, her husband and daughter where all diagnosed with COVID-19 out of the 3 the Husband was hospitalized. The wife asked the husband to let her know if they try to put him on a ventilator and to absolutely not let them put him on one. He has been at Parkland for a week or so. A couple of days ago the wife gets a call from her husbands nurse. She called attempting to get authorization to put her husband on a ventilator. unaware that the wife had spoke with her husband(the patient) 2 hours prior to getting the call from the nurse. My moms friend stated that her husband was getting better the hospital even decreased his oxygen use. so when the nurse called it didnt make sense. The wife worries and in disbelief said she would not authorize it. How the hell was he fine earlier and then 2 hours later in such a bad shape that he needed a ventilator? the nurse explained Covid can suddenly worsen in a couple of hours. The nurse insisted she give approval, the wife kept saying no, she even was given 3 minutes to make a decision. The nurse said she Doctor needed to know ASAP. She asked the nurse to speak to her husband and the nurse said he was in such bad shape that it was impossible. She insisted she speak to her husband again and the nurse kept saying she could not as he was in critical condition. Luckily the wife had left her husband a cell phone and she was able to call him. Franticly she called and spoke to him, he answered the phone calmly explaining he was doing great and had no idea what was going on or why the nurse would've called her stating that he was in such a bad state. My question is, what is really going on? are people getting better and getting killed to get money from the state? what would've happened had she given consent? its so many questions. if y'all know anyone who has this please don't believe everything the doctors or nurses say. Make sure your people are ok. Do exactly what she did and leave them access to a phone if possible. Its time we wake up they are killing us for money.
OpiateKiller
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2019
- Messages
- 2,370
It won’t let me link it.
Let’s stay on topic here don’t want to get my thread closed.
Joe Biden tweets in October 2019, that president Trump is incapable of handling a global pandemic.
Which is quite interesting considering the fact we weren’t warned until February 2020....
Which further proves my point Joe Biden is involved and compromised by the CCP as I was saying in my other thread.
They knew they couldn’t win the election fairly so the CCP dropped covid to win the US election.
It’s fucking sickening.
Joe Biden is not my president, and he never will be. The stars are aligning Charges will be filed soon and the whole top will crumble.
Last edited:
LordOfThisWorld
Bluelighter
Wow
I like you man but you need to realize they are ALL crooked. The sooner you do the sooner you’ll be free. Biden is a piece of garbage yes, so is Trump. So is most of the politicians in office.. All this is nothing new it just feels like it is.
I used to go down the same rabbit holes, I also thought martial law was going to be enacted like 200 times since 9/11 if you believed all the bullshit online. Free yourself of this and focus on recovery.
-GC
I used to go down the same rabbit holes, I also thought martial law was going to be enacted like 200 times since 9/11 if you believed all the bullshit online. Free yourself of this and focus on recovery.
-GC
OpiateKiller
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2019
- Messages
- 2,370
@JessFR @alasdairm @JGrimez
@Deru - I ask that you moderate this particular forum. And if you see fit close it. I feel my other thread was unfairly closed
@Deru - I ask that you moderate this particular forum. And if you see fit close it. I feel my other thread was unfairly closed
OpiateKiller
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2019
- Messages
- 2,370
I’ve thought the same things since high school.
But this feels different.
I’ll try and focus on recovery I am trying it’s hard.
And I like you too, always solid advice.
It is a rabbit hole, but what if it’s right? Who cares? Do we just give up and die? I mean that’s not the person I am.
You’re right though this is a waste of my efforts I need to get into law school that’s what I’m doing
But you’re 100% right they’re all basically not innocent they all have some level of involvement in some scandal or another.
this thread is the very definition of adding 2 and 2 and getting 6000.
if you have proof that biden was involved, then let's see it. otherwise this is nothing.
"biden is evil"? that's a matter of opinion.
"he will never be president of the united states"? we'll see in about 3 weeks.
alasdair
if you have proof that biden was involved, then let's see it. otherwise this is nothing.
"biden is evil"? that's a matter of opinion.
"he will never be president of the united states"? we'll see in about 3 weeks.
alasdair
OpiateKiller
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2019
- Messages
- 2,370
Yes we will, just joined a Facebook group 2 million Trump supporters saying they’ll be at the White House.
Good luck Biden
lol - well, if 2 million trump supporters claim they'll be at the white house i expect to see 100,000 or so.
make sure you wear a coat @OpiateKiller - it'll be cold!
alasdair
make sure you wear a coat @OpiateKiller - it'll be cold!
alasdair