• Philosophy and Spirituality
    Welcome Guest
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Threads of Note Socialize
  • P&S Moderators: Xorkoth | Madness

conciousness expanison

Molybdenum said:
hell it's fun to play with my hands if I get myself in a non-judgmental enough mindset. However, that style overall does not suit me

Yeah it does not suit you now, but who's to say what you will do should you ever have 15minutes in a consciousness expanded state. Your ego is gone, your perception is different, and so your rationality also changes a bit. I dont think there are styles of enlightment to pick and chose from. It either is or it isnt but once it is your normal acceptable behaviour alters.

Molybdenum said:
From the absolute perspective there is no such thing as motion; all time perfectly exists as it is. It is also equally valid to say that no things have an inherent existence, as anything which can be delimited is constantly in flux. Two apparently contradictory statements that delineate the limitations of our language in explaining true reality.


You cannot begin to realise what the expirence entails without going through it. Sure, your limitations disapear, but you are still you and you are still in this body in physical reality. The world doesnt disapear, you just get a better view. So you do what things you like to do, follow your character, and even though the old normality of limitations have gone, your consciousness is expanded but still here. I am pretty sure that in a higher awarness state your consciousness does not expand to include everything and then just disapear, pop like a baloon or get absorbed into creation. There are some practicalities involved in still being able to function, and continue life.
 
Yeah it does not suit you now, but who's to say what you will do should you ever have 15minutes in a consciousness expanded state. Your ego is gone, your perception is different, and so your rationality also changes a bit. I dont think there are styles of enlightment to pick and chose from. It either is or it isnt but once it is your normal acceptable behaviour alters.

There are no different enlightenments, but everyone's expression of enlightenment in their daily living will be different because everyone has slightly different preferences and life experience, and although those are seen past to the true self they are not necessarily changed. To judge from my own experience, habitual maladaptive responses that result from ego constriction are dropped but general interests and activities remain mostly the same. This may not be true for everyone.

You cannot begin to realise what the expirence entails without going through it. Sure, your limitations disapear, but you are still you and you are still in this body in physical reality. The world doesnt disapear, you just get a better view. So you do what things you like to do, follow your character, and even though the old normality of limitations have gone, your consciousness is expanded but still here. I am pretty sure that in a higher awarness state your consciousness does not expand to include everything and then just disapear, pop like a baloon or get absorbed into creation. There are some practicalities involved in still being able to function, and continue life.

Yeah, but I went through the experience although I can tell you don't believe me. I generally wouldn't believe random posters on this board either. That's ok; I know what it was and I don't particularly feel the need for external validation. I'm not claiming my consciousness "did" anything; all of the constrictions were just gone, and I think the fact that it sounds like I'm claiming certain things happened is a result of the inadequacy of language in describing the utterly ineffable more than anything else. This is a problem that I am well aware of and it's why I don't readily talk about enlightenment and spiritual practice with people unless I set myself up for it by posting on bluelight after I've had a few drinks. I agree with everything you wrote in this paragraph otherwise. I'm genuinely curious: how high have you gone and how often? How would you describe your experiences to get around the limitations of language?
 
what is not conscioussness expansion. even if you kill brain cells you are making room for more. Drugs kill brain cells but so does sneazing and they are as replenishable as your skin cells, which is the majority of the dust in your house.
 
in what ways can psychedelics help in the expansion of conciousness?

This is all IMHO, and you can find spiritual authors who run the gamut from promoting the ongoing use of psychedelics as introspective tools (ex. Ram Dass, Myron Stolaroff) to advocating utter abstinence (just about every zen roshi in zig zag zen - which is a great book to read if you're interested in the subject of consciousness and psychedelics. Has some kickass Alex Grey art in it too).

To best describe the mechanism of psychedelics, I would define the ego fundamentally as an energy/identity constriction with perhaps looping thoughtforms or other imbalances that it has produced. Psychedelics release energy that temporarily lifts you outside of some of these constrictions by overwhelming them, which means that your state is somewhat expanded although you often don't notice it because you're paying attention to all of the altered sensory information. From this perspective you may be able to see how silly some of the games you have been playing are or gain deeper understandings about the joy of the universe and your place in it than would be possible if sober and unfocused. At the same time, this loose energy will tend to magnify any imbalances that have been produced by ego constrictions, which is why you get runaway thought trains, possible bad trips, etc. and people who are already kind of unstable or highly energetically susceptible can be pushed over the edge. Higher doses and less recovery time can produce additive effects on the personality structure, making you quite strange (and I don't mean in a good way. this happened to me after 3 AMT trips and it took me about 3 mos. to get back to relatively normal, if I had kept going I don't know where I would have wound up).

The energy of every psychedelic is subtly different. My speculation from reading trip reports and my own experimentation is that most "deep" psychedelics incl. cannabis release different flavors of vibratory energy that temporarily remove some blockages depending on dose and type of psychedelic. "Light" psychedelics like many of the phenethylamines and MDMA sound like they produce a gloss over the blockages so that you don't feel them as much and can examine your life and actions introspectively without the usual baggage. However, I have never tried a phenethylamine. Dissociatives separate the more solid, distinct levels of consciousness like the body and emotions from the higher, broader areas like fluid energy forms and perhaps even the light, so at high plateau doses you are not in physical contact with reality.

There are more downsides too, psychedelic energy is not energy that the human body was designed to handle very well. Cannabis and shrooms generally were tolerated ok for me personally if used infrequently, but a lot of the synthetics I have found to be much harsher and produce longer subtle aftereffects as light energetic rips need to be healed. Is the fitness of natural psychedelics indicative of some divine gaia plan like Terence McKenna claims? A result of trip duration and stimulation level? Is it all in my head? How variable are my responses from someone else's? *shrugs*

Bottom line is that you can definitely get there without drugs, you can get the energy release naturally and develop it if you take the time to learn how, which is the only course I can strongly recommend although I enjoy infrequent drug use and do derive some benefit from it. Drugs can take you partway up the mountain for a short stay for the view. They also drain you temporarily, can be risky, and if you want to climb the mountain you will have to do it yourself. Psychedelics alone are not a path. The insights you receive must be integrated into your everyday life and being.
 
what is not conscioussness expansion. even if you kill brain cells you are making room for more. Drugs kill brain cells but so does sneazing and they are as replenishable as your skin cells, which is the majority of the dust in your house.

Well, neurobiologists are starting to come around on the idea that some areas of the brain have limited regeneration, but for the most part once the cells in the central nervous system are dead, they're gone.

This isn't an argument against drugs because "gee, all drugs are bad." But although I found drugs quite useful for certain things I eventually started to see their downsides and limitations. I try to convey the benefits and drawbacks as impartially as I can so that people can make their own decision.

The "argument" void and I are having about expansion is not an oblique reference to drug use at all but instead has to do with the fact that expansion is not a very accurate term for explaining what is going on in ego-loss and -death states. It implies that the small self somehow becomes bigger and encompasses broader definitions, whereas what really happens is that the small self is partially or completely destroyed or temporarily goes out to lunch, allowing clear perception of the free play of the absolute.

Boy, I am quite the chatty cathy this afternoon. Guess who has a big assignment due tomorrow?
 
Molybdenum: I believe in what you claim, and I would hardly call it a disagreement. I just have a slightly different interpritation based on my own experience in these states. I actually posted a trip report with my experience years n years ago on here, but its been deleted. Might do a small summery to post up on here later on.
 
wheelchair said:
in what ways can psychedelics help in the expansion of conciousness?


Sure, they can open you up to the possibility of something more. But they are limited, your kinda stuck to follow the rises and falls of the drug, and there can be nasty side effects. Some cultures use drugs in rituals for certain purposes, but that is generall done by people who can go into the states without them. People with some experience.
 
Molybdenum: I believe in what you claim, and I would hardly call it a disagreement. I just have a slightly different interpritation based on my own experience in these states. I actually posted a trip report with my experience years n years ago on here, but its been deleted. Might do a small summery to post up on here later on.

Interesting how much I read into a reply that's not really there... anyway, could you try to articulate how your interpretation differs? I think you've certainly pointed out the inherent problems with the limited words we have to use, but outside of what my experience was I don't have a firm sense of your opinion as separate from mine other than perhaps different word choices and different modes of expression.

I can't help but wonder if it isn't just a personality difference. After that experience, habitual ego-constriction persists, although everyone, no matter what their state, is perfectly as they are before the absolute. It could be that your response is to work with various subtle energies through reiki, oobes and astral travel, and my response is to work through meditative practices. Neither is good or bad they are just different. Would you say that in day to day life you still function with an ego, or is it totally gone and you are the absoulte acting?

If you can dig up a copy of that report somewhere it would be great.
 
Last edited:
The report is gone, I already checked a while ago. Will have to re-write. I am still effected by ego. I had the experience a few years ago, before I had even heard of reiki, oobe or astral travel.

I have had smaller experiences since then, of the initial occurances of highened awarness but not upto the point where my initial experience was. Where the lesser mind is completely gone and the greater balances out and merges with the worldy experience within the physical form. Though words do fail, I'll re-write a summary and post it up.

I think we differ in the point that I feel you are always in full control, the experience doesnt take over your self. It can be controlled just as you can control your breath. Also, everything you are now no longer applies during the experience since your previous way of thinking, belief system and all that is not compatible. Just the core of your self carries on.
 
"the experience doesnt take over your self." in application with belief , givin the right conditioning you would be suprised what man can do to eachother with just mere expierences
 
I'll re-write a summary and post it up.

Thanks, I look forward to it, let me know when you do.

the lesser mind is completely gone and the greater balances out and merges with the worldy experience within the physical form... Also, everything you are now no longer applies during the experience since your previous way of thinking, belief system and all that is not compatible. Just the core of your self carries on.

I relate to all of this completely. Our response to this experience was really quite similar in a way; we both took time and effort to learn to use energy to go to up to a limited extent with a high degree of control. Doing this teaches us about ourselves, and chips away at our habitual ego structures. We just use different techniques.

the experience doesnt take over your self. It can be controlled just as you can control your breath.

See, I was saying "no control" because (to borrow your phrasing from quote 2) the lesser mind is totally gone. When I hear people talking about "control," I usually assume they're talking about having the lesser mind, illusion that it is, control some "experience". When you go up with energy techniques, the grossest aspects of your lower mind *are* losing control. That's ego-crunching and basically the definition of going up. Deeper aspects remain in control. When the lesser mind is totally gone, all aspects of both ego and personality structure are seen as the free play of the infinite and to say anything is either controlled or not controlled, like using any other delimiting concept, is to impose a false screen on the true reality of the situation.

I don't think you can go there and back as easy as you decide to take your next breath. Neither of us has gone all the way back since, although certainly it could happen again. If you can control the truest, highest experience that way, then you probably bring basically no ego to the table in everyday life. Do you believe it's possible to get there and stay there for years or even the rest of your physical life?
 
Last edited:
"the experience doesnt take over your self." in application with belief , givin the right conditioning you would be suprised what man can do to eachother with just mere expierences

In the experience, the ego is totally gone. That's a huge transition. But the personality structure persists and is functioning. That's how I would interpret that sentiment.

Sorry, I can't resist pointing out the vaguely homoerotic undertones. I'm a weak, weak man.
 
Molybdenum said:
Neither of us has gone all the way back since, although certainly it could happen again. If you can control the truest, highest experience that way, then you probably bring basically no ego to the table in everyday life. Do you believe it's possible to get there and stay there for years or even the rest of your physical life?


Yeah I recon you can. The world with everyone in that state would rock. I think once it is trained you can go up and down easily, but by then you wont have much ego. Some ego is good to relate to others, but there is the notion of folly. Not sure it relates, but its about knowing how to act in any situation, and it might be necessarily if your walking around without ego.
 
sorry to be altering the topic so much, but i've just started reading metaphysics by aristotle and have a few questions. are all branches of philosophy encorporated into metaphysics? some of the things discussed such as theoretical knowledge and some aspects of morals seem to not be part of metaphysics.
 
wheelchair said:
sorry to be altering the topic so much, but i've just started reading metaphysics by aristotle and have a few questions. are all branches of philosophy encorporated into metaphysics? some of the things discussed such as theoretical knowledge and some aspects of morals seem to not be part of metaphysics.

Well, in the olden days spirituality was a part of the educational program. You'd learn philosophy, mathematics, science, etc and spirituality. Though it was probably a mix of psychology and spiritual stuff.

I havent read about all the branches of philosophy but I think that it is probably important in learning about how to get into heightened states of consciousness. Though if you were to experiment with it, you'd find out what degree of importance it has.

Your ego is only one small part of you, so if you were to get into such an egoless states, your core self would be what is important. Everything about you and the world would still be there, only the ego would be gone. So in that regard theory would help, as would morals. Its far greater to be in those states with some understanding about what is going on, and with positive emotions like compassion, joy, happiness, rather then fear. There will be awe going on, excitement, and some traditions say that fear will always be a part of it too seeing as its an uncommon reality but I dont think so. I feel that morals could help you be more positive, and theory may help a bit with understanding and accepting.
 
Yeah I recon you can. The world with everyone in that state would rock. I think once it is trained you can go up and down easily, but by then you wont have much ego. Some ego is good to relate to others, but there is the notion of folly. Not sure it relates, but its about knowing how to act in any situation, and it might be necessarily if your walking around without ego.

I think you could be ok without any ego if you gradually got there. I mean your personality structure, your physical, emotional, and mental capacities are still functioning fine and don't have this distorting layer placed over them. Again, I think this is more true if you are gradually weaned off of the ego (this is why permanently dropping it all at once is often highly disruptive of the life situation). Although the more constricted those around you are, the more you might interact with them better if you have a little left. My experience has been that the more ego I permanently dump over the side, the more interesting, intimate, and easy my interpersonal relations get, and the better I handle difficult people with whom I have little in common. With less thought about myself I am better able to place myself in the shoes of others, and with sharper perception I am better able to perceive their moods and how they came to be. I'm sure you can relate.

I guess we won't know for sure until we both get there ;).

I agree with you that a world full of enlightened people would rock. Hardcore. That's why belief in the whole 2012 thing is so seductive for me... first millenialist movement that predicts gradual mass global enlightenment over the next 15-20 years instead of angels, comets, floods, etc.
 
sorry to be altering the topic so much, but i've just started reading metaphysics by aristotle and have a few questions. are all branches of philosophy encorporated into metaphysics? some of the things discussed such as theoretical knowledge and some aspects of morals seem to not be part of metaphysics.

Might want to start a new thread on this one to get some new replies... I know a lot about eastern philosophies (if I may so brazenly toot my own horn), but I completely burned out on western philosophy years ago after one college semester and reading zen and the art of motorcycle maintenance which discusses the start of western philosophical trends.

I would argue that metaphysics inform any philosophical problem, and the reason philosophers have been arguing for the last 2000+ years, besides the need for job security, is that their systems all have different inherent metaphysical postulates. They never state them clearly, probably because they aren't aware of them, or are even proud of them and don't think of them as biases. They spend most of their time ripping down each other's arguments by pointing out that there are other equally valid (and invalid) postulates and that the other's postulates fail to account for this that and the other thing.

No postulates will survive intense scrutiny and counterexample because no fixed viewpoint of reality is a true view of reality that will fully satisfy the wolf at the door. So these arguments will never end, but employed philosophers either do not realize this or just enjoy arguing because it makes them feel smart (I swear to god that's the motivation for a lot of them after having met some famous ones back in school).

Oh yes, morals... the class I took was actually on morals. I think here we have a case where the "good thing to do" is known by a flexible gut sense (an aspect of our true self? an evolutionary byproduct? YMMV) that responds to situations as they arise. Philosophers are introspecting about their own gut sensing although not dealing with the situation at the time, and trying to build inflexible moral systems that always lead to the right gut choice. Again, any inflexible system fails to encompass the true reality and so you can tear any big system down. The professor in the class I took (Michael Sandel, he's pretty famous too) just tore everyone else apart and sort of lamely put up his own idea for a half hour on the last day, giving an emotional speech and fleeing before anyone could question him. I practically wanted to scream by that point, "why not admit that this is all bullshit? It's important to tear each other down so that no one starts following impractical systems to closely, and it can even be fun to argue, but don't pretend you'll ever build a system that works everywhere!" Yeah, I was kinda pissed...
 
I'll probably be typing up my experience in the next few days so watch this spot. I've included this to tide ya over:

By Don Juan.

A Separate Reality

You think about yourself too much and that gives you a strange fatigue that makes you shut off the world around you and cling to your arguments.

A light and amenable disposition is needed in order to withstand the impact and the strangeness of the knowledge I am teaching you. Feeling important makes one heavy, clumsy, and vain. To be a man of knowledge one needs to be light and fluid.

One has to reduce to a minimum all that is unnecessary in one's life.

Once you decide something put all your petty fears away. Your decision should vanquish them. I will tell you time and time again, the most effective way to live is as a warrior. Worry and think before you make any decision, but once you make it, be on your way free from worries or thoughts; there will be a million other decisions still awaiting you. That's the warrior's way.

A warrior thinks of his death when things become unclear. The idea of death is the only thing that tempers our spirit.

To be a warrior you have to be crystal clear.

My acts are sincere but they are only the acts of an actor because everything I do is controlled folly. Everything I do in regard to myself and my fellow men is folly, because nothing matters.

Certain things in your life matter to you because they're important; your acts are certainly important to you, but for me, not a single thing is important any longer, neither my acts nor the acts of any of my fellow men.
I go on living though, because I have my will . Because I have tempered my
will throughout my life until it's neat and wholesome and now it doesn't
matter to me that nothing matters. My will controls the folly of my life.

Once a man learns to see he finds himself alone in the world with nothing but folly. Your acts, as well as the acts of your fellow men in general, appear to be important to you because you have learned to think they are important.

We learn to think about everything, and then we train our eyes to look as we think about the things we look at. We look at ourselves already thinking that we are important. And therefore we've got to feel important! But then when a man learns to see , he realizes that he can no longer think about the things he looks at, and if he cannot think about what he looks at everything becomes unimportant. Everything is equal and therefore unimportant.

We need to look with our eyes to laugh. When our eyes see, everything is so equal that nothing is funny. My laughter, as well as everything I do is real but it also is controlled folly because it is useless; it changes nothing and yet I still do it.

One must always choose the path with heart in order to be at one's best, perhaps so one can always laugh. You don't understand me now because of your habit of thinking as you look and thinking as you think. By "thinking" I mean the constant idea that we have of everything in the world. Seeing dispels that habit and until you learn to see you will not really understand what I mean.

Our lot as men is to learn. I have learned to see and I tell you that nothing really matters. A man of knowledge lives by acting, not by thinking about acting, nor by thinking about what he will think when he has finished acting. A man of knowledge chooses a path with heart and follows it; and then he looks and rejoices and laughs; and then he sees and knows. He knows that his life will be over altogether too soon; he knows that he, as well as everybody else, is not going anywhere; he knows, because he sees , that nothing is more important than anything else. In other words, a man of knowledge has no honor, no dignity, no family, no name, no country, but only life to be lived, and under these circumstances his only tie to his fellow men is his controlled folly. Thus a man of knowledge endeavors, and sweats, and puffs, and if one looks at him he is just like any ordinary man, except that the folly of his life is under control. Nothing being more important than anything else, a man of knowledge chooses any act, and acts it out as if it matters to him. His controlled folly makes him say that what he does matters and makes him act as if it did, and yet he knows that it doesn't; so when he fulfills his acts he retreats in peace, and whether his acts were good or bad, or worked or didn't, is in no way part of his concern.

You think about your acts, therefore you have to believe your acts are as important as you think they are, when in reality nothing of what one does is important. Nothing! But then if nothing really matters, as you ask me, how can I go on living? It would be simple to die; that's what you say and believe, because you're thinking about life, just as you're thinking now what seeing would be like.

You want me to describe it to you so you can begin to think about it, the way you do with everything else. In the case of seeing, however, thinking is not the issue at all, so I cannot tell you what it is like to see . Now you want me to describe the reasons for my controlled folly and I can only tell you that controlled folly is very much like seeing ; it is something you cannot think about.

Our lot as men is to learn and, as I've said, one goes to knowledge as one goes to war; with fear, with respect, aware that one is going to war, and with absolute confidence in oneself. Put your trust in yourself. There's no emptiness in the life of a man of knowledge, everything is filled to the brim and everything is equal. For me there is no victory, or defeat, or emptiness. Everything is filled to the brim and everything is equal and my struggle is worth my while.

In order to become a man of knowledge one must be a warrior. One must strive without giving up, without a complaint, without flinching, until one sees , only to realize then that nothing matters. You're too concerned with liking people or with being liked yourself. A man of knowledge likes, that's all. He likes whatever or whoever he wants, but he uses his controlled folly to be unconcerned about it. My controlled folly applies only to myself and to the acts I perform while in the company of my fellow men.

You must talk to the plants you're going to pick before you pick them. In order to see the plants you must talk to them personally, you must get to know them individually; then the plants can tell you anything you care to know about them. You fail to understand that I am not joking. When a sorcerer attempts to see, he attempts to gain power. You think everything in the world is simple to understand because everything you do is a routine that is simple to understand.

You have to have an unbending intent in order to become a man of knowledge.
* *

A warrior takes responsibility for his acts; for the most trivial of his acts. He waits patiently, knowing that he is waiting, and knowing what he is waiting for. That is the warrior's way. What makes us unhappy is to want. Yet if we would learn to cut our wants to nothing, the smallest thing we'd get would be a true gift. To be poor or wanting is only a thought; and so is to hate, or to be hungry, or to be in pain. They are only thoughts for me now, I have accomplished that feat. The power to do that is all we have, mind you, to oppose the forces of our lives; without that power we are dregs, dust in the wind.

It is up to us as single individuals to oppose the forces of our lives. Only a warrior can survive. A warrior knows that he is waiting and what he is waiting for; and while he waits he wants nothing and thus whatever little thing he gets is more than he can take. If he needs to eat he finds a way, because he is not hungry; if something hurts his body he finds a way to stop it, because he is not in pain. To be hungry or to be in pain means that the man has abandoned himself and is no longer a warrior; and the forces of his hunger and pain will destroy him.
* * *

The countless paths one traverses in one's life are all equal. Oppressors and oppressed meet at the end, and the only thing that prevails is that life was altogether too short for both.

You must act like a warrior. One learns to act like a warrior by acting, not by talking. A warrior has only his will and his patience and with them he builds anything he wants. You have no more time for retreats or for regrets. You only have time to live like a warrior and work for patience and will.

Will is something very special. It happens mysteriously. There is no real way of telling how one uses it, except that the results of using the will are astounding. Perhaps the first thing that one should do is to know that one can develop the will . A warrior knows that and proceeds to wait for it.

A warrior knows that he is waiting and knows what he is waiting for. It is very difficult, if not impossible, for the average man to know what he is waiting for. A warrior, however, has no problems; he knows that he is waiting for his will .Will is something very clear and powerful which can direct our acts. Will is something a man uses, for instance, to win a battle which he, by all calculations, should lose. It is not what we call courage. Courage is something else. Men of courage are dependable men, noble men perennially surrounded by people who flock around them and admire them; yet very few men of courage have will. Usually they are fearless men who are given to performing daring common-sense acts; most of the time a courageous man is also fearsome and feared. Will , on the other hand, has to do with astonishing feats that defy our common sense. You may say that it is a kind of control.

Will is not what one calls "will power." Denying oneself certain things with "will power," is an indulgence and I don't recommend anything of the kind. The indulgence of denying is by far the worst; it forces us to believe we are doing great things, when in effect we are only fixed within ourselves.

Will is a power. And since it is a power it has to be controlled and tuned and that takes time. When I was your age I was as impulsive as you. Yet I have changed. Our will operates in spite of our indulgence. For example your will is already opening your gap, little by little. There is a gap in us; like the soft spot on the head of a child which closes with age, this gap opens as one develops one's will . It's an opening. It allows a space for the will to shoot out, like an arrow. What a sorcerer calls will is a power within ourselves. It is not a thought, or an object, or a wish. An act of "will power" is not will because such an act needs thinking and wishing. Will is what can make you succeed when your thoughts tell you that you're defeated. Will is a force which is the true link between men and the world.

The world is whatever we perceive, in any manner we may choose to perceive. Perceiving the world entails a process of apprehending whatever presents itself to us. This particular perceiving is done with our senses and with our will . Will is a relation between ourselves and the perceived world. What the average man calls will is character and strong disposition. What a sorcerer calls will is a force that comes from within and attaches itself to the world out there. One can perceive the world with the senses as well as with the will. An average man can "grab" the things of the world only with his hands, or his senses, but a sorcerer can grab them also with his will . I cannot really describe how it is done, but you yourself, for instance, cannot describe to me how you hear. It happens that I am also capable of hearing, so we can talk about what we hear, but not about how we hear. A sorcerer uses his will to perceive the world. That perceiving, however, is not like hearing. When we look at the world or when we hear it, we have the impression that it is out there and that it is real. When we perceive the world with our will we know that the world is not as "out there" or as "real" as we think.

Will is a force, a power. Seeing is not a force, but rather a way of getting through things. A sorcerer may have a very strong will and yet he may not see ; which means that only a man of knowledge perceives the world with his senses and with his will and also with his seeing.

Now you know you are waiting for your will. You still don't know what it is, or how it could happen to you. So watch carefully everything you do.
 
That is a great piece and I have few doubts that the author(s) knows of what he speaks. Castaneda's Journey to Ixtlan practically jumped into my hands at a bookstore several months ago; that quote is from that book, is it not? Perhaps it is time that I read it. Look forward to your story.

Perspective-adding comments:

When one has the will purely, there is no longer anyone who has anything, just what I like to call the free action of the absolute. Without will, one's action is still the free action of the absolute, but the constricted free action of the absolute (if I made any sense there at all) and stronger energies cannot be passed in those actions. When one sees purely, there are no self-referential distortions in one's view of the free action of the absolute. One cannot "get to" pure view or pure will, but can identify and in so doing release blockages on pure view and pure will once one has seen what blockages are.

More than I would say that nothing matters, I would say that mattering is a meaningless concept just as insisting on the existence of anything which could possibly matter or not is to fall into error. There's no distinction, but I think that's a clearer phrasing. However, as countervailing wisdom to much of the rubbish that passes for "spiritual" these days Don Juan's phrasing is far less diffuse and verbose.
 
Top