Church Drug Raid in Pittsburgh

Ason Unique

Bluelighter
Joined
Jul 8, 2008
Messages
1,436
Location
Pittsburgh, Pistolvania
Source: http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/regional/fayette/s_636496.html

Funk Fest" became one big bust this weekend at the Church of Universal Love and Music.

The Fayette County Drug Task Force conducted a drug raid this weekend on the self-proclaimed nondenominational church's 147-acre property in Bullskin. It resulted in the arrests of 23 people and the seizure of enough marijuana, hash brownies, hallucinogenic mushrooms, LSD, laughing gas and drug paraphernalia to pack two storage trailers with a capacity of about 3,000 pounds, District Attorney Nancy Vernon said Sunday.

Dozens of bags, boxes and plastic cases containing contraband were on display at a news conference.

"What you see here is a fraction of what we found," Vernon said.

The two trailers used to pack up the suspected drugs belonged to two people arrested on charges of running makeshift drug paraphernalia shops, said Mark Brooks, the county's assistant district attorney in charge of drug enforcement.

"We weren't sure how much (drugs and paraphernalia) there would be to find before we got there," Brooks said. "By the time we were done seizing everything, we decided we had to seize the trailers for use under the state's Forfeiture Act just to haul everything out of there."

The raid began about 5 p.m. Saturday at the site where church founder and property owner William "Willie" Pritts received clearance from county officials to resume holding concerts.

During a lengthy property dispute that began in 2005 and ended this year, Pritts, the members of the church and many of those attending concerts there argued that their form of religious worship entails listening to bands.

This was the fifth concert at the site since Pritts dropped a religious-freedom lawsuit against the county, which had claimed the group's concerts violated zoning laws.

Between 500 and 600 people were dancing, partying and socializing Saturday to the sounds of bands such as Ivan Neville's Dumpstaphunk.

Brooks said undercover agents purchased illegal drugs at concerts on the site on May 16 and July 4. That provided probable cause for county Judge Ralph C. Warman to sign a search warrant.

"This was the most tactically complex drug raid I've ever conducted, the most complex warrant I've ever issued," Brooks said. "We're talking a 42-acre area with a number of buildings and vendors and a lot of people."

Thirty officers divided into five teams upon entering the site's concert grounds to explore five main areas: the stage, two camping areas, a vendor area and an office area.

Upon seeing the police, many concert-goers fled to surrounding woods, leaving behind large amounts of marijuana, unspecified pills and baked goods laced with drugs, Brooks said.

One person was charged with possessing four 60-pound tanks of nitrous oxide he was selling in large balloons for $5, Brooks said. Another was found to be in possession of five tabs of lysergic acid diethylamide, or LSD, a powerful hallucinogen. Another had $3,000 cash from selling hallucinogenic mushrooms, authorities said.

The 23 suspects were arraigned overnight Saturday before Uniontown District Judge Joseph George on drug-related charges. All were taken to Fayette County Prison. Several were released on bond yesterday, a prison official said.

Standing near the entrance to the site yesterday, Pritts said he did not care for the manner in which the raid was conducted.

"It was ugly," Pritts said. "My kids are terrified of police now."

Vernon said she would spend today preparing paperwork for preliminary hearings. She had little comment on the future of the church.

"We're not the zoning office. We're a law enforcement agency," Vernon said. "As an aside, it does a good public service to aid the county in eliminating what has proven to be a major operation here."

What a shame! So close to me, these people weren't even bothering anybody.

Wish I could of ran and grabbed what they dropped though lol.
 
Yeah I thought about going to that. Had heard it was a good time.

Freakin cops messing with the way people worship.
 
man these drugs are all harmless really. I think that society as a whole doesn't really understand these kinds of drugs. But anyways they should be focusing on just meth and crack. Leave the rest alone
 
Another was found to be in possession of five tabs of lysergic acid diethylamide, or LSD, a powerful hallucinogen

My GOD! Five tabs! That kingpin! lol wtf man

Sounds like lots escaped into the woods at least hehe

Anyone living around there should go hiking in the area and see what you find =)
 
man these drugs are all harmless really. I think that society as a whole doesn't really understand these kinds of drugs. But anyways they should be focusing on just meth and crack. Leave the rest alone

Why just meth and crack? Why should any drug or particular drug user be focused on for harrassment, incarceration, etc?

There is plenty of precedent concerning the use of Schedule I substances for religious purposes legally in the US under the 1st Amendment. Ayahuasca & Peyote specifically.

I wonder why it is so difficult to earn this status. There have been many LSD and other drug-based religions since the '60s.

The Native American Church & Brazilian religion cases seem like racial guilt more than anything else. Similar cases involving whites (Timothy Leary) are simply disregarded.
 
I wonder why it is so difficult to earn this status. There have been many LSD and other drug-based religions since the '60s.

Because most of these religions are just a cheap excuse to get fucked up on drugs.

I could start a religion based around taking ecstasy, amphetamines and ketamine while dancing to loud electronic music and call it raveology. Doesn't mean the government is just going to say 'oh hey you guys can take ecstasy legally now'
 
Because most of these religions are just a cheap excuse to get fucked up on drugs.

I could start a religion based around taking ecstasy, amphetamines and ketamine while dancing to loud electronic music and call it raveology. Doesn't mean the government is just going to say 'oh hey you guys can take ecstasy legally now'

I guess I don't understand the difference. I understand what you are saying, but I don't understand how that is a basis to deny the right to practice religion as you see fit- especially when we have recent legal precedent about just this topic (CI illegal drugs being allowed by members of particular religions).

In essence, lets put 3 religions on the table.

Religion 1 uses Peyote (Mescaline, CI). US courts say that they can. Religion 2 uses Ayahuasca (DMT, CI). US courts say that they can. The 'Temple Of The True Inner Light' uses DPT (Dipropyltryptamine, Unscheduled) specifically to skirt the American Controlled Substances Act. While other drugs (including Mescaline & DMT) are considered to be sacraments and necessary devices to practice their religion as well as DPT, I find it highly unlikely that the TTIL would win a similar case to Religions 1 & 2 if members were arrested while possessing Mescaline, DMT, LSD, etc. Plus, like I said, Tim Leary tried this tactic concerning his Marijuana possession case. He personally documented years of his life and various experiences using drugs as spiritual tools, aids, guides, what have you. Despite the court documents where everyone seemed to acknowledge that his claims were legitimate and sincere (that he actually only uses Marijuana and other drugs to augment religious practices), they still found against him.

What makes one religion, dogma, belief structure, etc anymore legitimate than another? Motive? The number of members? How long it has existed?
 
I guess I don't understand the difference. I understand what you are saying, but I don't understand how that is a basis to deny the right to practice religion as you see fit- especially when we have recent legal precedent about just this topic (CI illegal drugs being allowed by members of particular religions).

In essence, lets put 3 religions on the table.

Religion 1 uses Peyote (Mescaline, CI). US courts say that they can. Religion 2 uses Ayahuasca (DMT, CI). US courts say that they can. The 'Temple Of The True Inner Light' uses DPT (Dipropyltryptamine, Unscheduled) specifically to skirt the American Controlled Substances Act. While other drugs (including Mescaline & DMT) are considered to be sacraments and necessary devices to practice their religion as well as DPT, I find it highly unlikely that the TTIL would win a similar case to Religions 1 & 2 if members were arrested while possessing Mescaline, DMT, LSD, etc. Plus, like I said, Tim Leary tried this tactic concerning his Marijuana possession case. He personally documented years of his life and various experiences using drugs as spiritual tools, aids, guides, what have you. Despite the court documents where everyone seemed to acknowledge that his claims were legitimate and sincere (that he actually only uses Marijuana and other drugs to augment religious practices), they still found against him.

What makes one religion, dogma, belief structure, etc anymore legitimate than another? Motive? The number of members? How long it has existed?

This is a freakin' excellent question, and one I have wondered about myself. You have inspired me to go off and do a some reading on what the law and courts have had to say about this. It would certainly make an excellent research topic for a constitutional law class.
 
I guess I don't understand the difference. I understand what you are saying, but I don't understand how that is a basis to deny the right to practice religion as you see fit- especially when we have recent legal precedent about just this topic (CI illegal drugs being allowed by members of particular religions).

In essence, lets put 3 religions on the table.

Religion 1 uses Peyote (Mescaline, CI). US courts say that they can. Religion 2 uses Ayahuasca (DMT, CI). US courts say that they can. The 'Temple Of The True Inner Light' uses DPT (Dipropyltryptamine, Unscheduled) specifically to skirt the American Controlled Substances Act. While other drugs (including Mescaline & DMT) are considered to be sacraments and necessary devices to practice their religion as well as DPT, I find it highly unlikely that the TTIL would win a similar case to Religions 1 & 2 if members were arrested while possessing Mescaline, DMT, LSD, etc. Plus, like I said, Tim Leary tried this tactic concerning his Marijuana possession case. He personally documented years of his life and various experiences using drugs as spiritual tools, aids, guides, what have you. Despite the court documents where everyone seemed to acknowledge that his claims were legitimate and sincere (that he actually only uses Marijuana and other drugs to augment religious practices), they still found against him.

What makes one religion, dogma, belief structure, etc anymore legitimate than another? Motive? The number of members? How long it has existed?

I'd say the difference is in whether the religion existed before people started abusing the drug to get high and whether it's a part of the individuals greater cultural background.

Someone of native american descent using peyote for religious purposes as his people have for thousands of years? Probably religious.

Some suburban white kid who listens to the grateful dead who decides to say he's part of a religion based around psychadelics when he gets busted with a sheet of acid? Probably not.
 
I'd say the difference is in whether the religion existed before people started abusing the drug to get high and whether it's a part of the individuals greater cultural background.

Someone of native american descent using peyote for religious purposes as his people have for thousands of years? Probably religious.

Some suburban white kid who listens to the grateful dead who decides to say he's part of a religion based around psychadelics when he gets busted with a sheet of acid? Probably not.

This is precisely why this situation exists.

My point is that this is not a fair or just bias to have. People of all ethnic and cultural backgrounds put a huge amount of reverence and trust in individual religious practice and belief. In the US, so much so that the government has given a free pass, since this countries founding, to anyone to practice anyway they see fit- up to and including ingesting illegal substances.

So I'd like to re-ask the questions of my last post:

What makes one religion, dogma, belief structure, etc anymore legitimate than another? Motive? The number of members? How long it has existed?

What makes one persons claim to religious sacraments anymore legitimate than anothers?

I'd just like someone to follow through and say it. That one religion, or group of religions, should be considered more legitimate than another- or, that one persons claims of religious worship or intent are more legitimate than anothers- on the basis of race, creed, gender, age, culture, nationality, etc.
 
I'd say the difference is in whether the religion existed before people started abusing the drug to get high and whether it's a part of the individuals greater cultural background.

Someone of native american descent using peyote for religious purposes as his people have for thousands of years? Probably religious.

Some suburban white kid who listens to the grateful dead who decides to say he's part of a religion based around psychadelics when he gets busted with a sheet of acid? Probably not.

it's unfortunate you must suffer decades of oppression and suffering before something can even be discussed as beneficial to a person, society, etc

ex. marijuana

----------------
Now playing: Snoop Dogg - Who Am I (What's My Name?)
via FoxyTunes
 
What makes one religion, dogma, belief structure, etc anymore legitimate than another? Motive? The number of members? How long it has existed?

I'd say existing for a reason other than as a justification for drug use is a good start.
 
Top