• 🇳🇿 🇲🇲 🇯🇵 🇨🇳 🇦🇺 🇦🇶 🇮🇳
    Australian & Asian
    Drug Discussion


    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • AADD Moderators: andyturbo

Cheap Personal Alcohol Breath Tester

phase_dancer

Bluelight Crew
Joined
Mar 12, 2001
Messages
6,178
Location
Australia
Not sure of the accuracy of these devices -the suppliers don't accept responsibility for accuracy- but I'm sure one could check reliability over a few sessions by consuming known amounts of alcohol in a given time. Using the linear voltage output, if you had a multimeter or oscilloscope, you could quite easily check the precision of 2 or more units.

Anyway, at the price ($27-00 AUS), even if it didn't work that well, you'd still have a light and a key ring holder 8)

ALCOHOL BREATH TESTER: Now you can carry your own personal alcohol breath tester in your pocket. Gives readings of >0.02% and >0.05%. Features: Small and light-weight (40g), Key chain & Torch function, LED indicators. A Linear voltage output is available from the sensor itself. Requires 2 x AAA battery, not supplied.

NOTE: The indication of this alcohol test gives BAC for reference only. We do not take any legal responsibility.

Oatley Electronics

abt01.jpg
 
I was investigating these a while back and considered getting one, but they were all around the $70ish mark. Also, I actually went and asked a cop what his opinion of them were, and as well as the standard line ("it's safer not to drink and drive at all"), he also said that these can often be innacurate and can provide a false sense of security to the driver, which can increase the danger in itself.

For $27 bucks though, it's almost worth the gamble. Might look into it! :)
 
i reckon I'd have to aggree with the man in blue in regard to the reliability of these small keychain bretho's. A friend of mine recently turned 21 so I got a him a beatho for his birthday. Its suposed to be quite reliable and from reports since I got it for him it is accurate. It about the size of a cordless phone and comes with a heap of tubes that you use to blow into, similar to those the police use. Gives an analogue reading via a needle scale thing like a car speedo or tacho. Cost me around the $90 mark.
I'd say a good investment for those who like to have a fewe drinks and then drive. In long run I'm sure it works out cheaper than loosing one's licence

Beech Out =D
 
When it comes down to it, there is no reason why these devices couldn't be quite reliable. The technology isn't exactly ground breaking. Perhaps one of the more accurate disposable types would allow a good comparison. Personal BAC tester would also require periodic checking.

Anyway, even if it's just used for a guide. If you set your safety margin at below a reading of 0.02% then I think it could be a useful aid.

I guess we can't help being cautious after the weighing scales fiasco of recent times. If it's any consolation, I've bought good and bad things from these guys, but the commercial or more expensive products >$50-00 have all been great. My 150mW blue argon tube came from them at a very good price and its now been going for 9 years, running above its maximum anode current!
 
Anyway, even if it's just used for a guide. If you set your safety margin at below a reading of 0.02% then I think it could be a useful aid.
Very good point.

BigTrancer :)
 
These only give you two readings, .02 & .05

Personally I would like to see these give you a real reading, not just one or the other, pass/fail. Imagine how much fun you can have at the pub with mates testing how pissed you are!!! and how not pissed your mate who fell off the stool is. priceless... =D
 
Well, fuckit - I just bought one. Should take a week to get here. I'll let everyone know whether it's any good, or whether I just bought a $30 key ring.
phase_dancer said:
Perhaps one of the more accurate disposable types would allow a good comparison.
Can you expand on that? What are the more accurate ones - and where can you pick these up? Do those ones you see on the front shelf at servos count, or are they just dodgy scams?
 
Well I haven't sighted manufacturers claims or anything, but as I see it, the old dirchromate oxidation (to green) based single use jobbies should be pretty accurate. Other things can affect them but no more than the older roadside tests, which were pretty good. Trouble is Cr VI is now a listed carcinogen, so they may no longer be around.

I'd be anxious to test the device by consuming just over the 2 or 3 std drinks thing, waiting 10 mins, rinsing your mouth (to remove mouth alcohol) and blow. If you're repeating the test you would of course want to take into account what you'd earlier eaten etc.

Surely pharmacists would have or know about disposable BAC tests. Otherwise, you could track down the company that supplies the police. Such things can be easily done but may require a mimimum order. (remind me one day to tell how we purchased something for a rave in a similar way). However samples are often supplied to perspective customers. You could always tell them you run B&S balls (god forbid) and want to offer an effective deterent to driving or something along those lines. Of course he may reply with something like "Why bother, don't the cops already look after you people" ;)
 
Interesting article from back in 2001
Personal Brethalyser
The Sydney Morning Herald - Weekend Edition
Saturday 19-20 May 2001
by Peter McKay
Motoring Section


Every NSW police car is an RBT unit, yet drink-drivers still play Russian roulette. Peter McKay becomes a guinea pig with a personal, hand-held breathalyser.

What price would you pay to avoid shame, licence disqualification and possibly maiming or killing someone? For about $600, or the price of a set of tyres, a premium quality personal blood-alcohol tester will keep you on the road - by telling you when to take a taxi.

People baulk at the price of the better, accurate, personal test units. Yet few would be keen to drive around radar-infested NSW in a vehicle without a speedometer.

Many pubs and clubs have wall-mounted breathalysers for patrons concerned about their blood alcohol concentration (BAC), but that's no help when you're at a favourite restaurant working your way through a bottle of wine.

There are dozens of mainly imported personal, hand-held testers that use semi-conductor sensors. Priced about $100, these are often wildly inaccurate, potentially lethal toys with little discriminatory ability. The high-quality units use fuel-cell technology, are mobile phone-sized, accurate to 10 per cent or better and should be regularly recalibrated by the manufacturer.

Full Story
 
Methods Used For Alcohol Detection

Although a few years old (1995) this paper outlines the different systems and the basics of how each works. Here's an excerpt.

Taken From : Breath Alcohol Instrumentation A Proposal in Commercial Taxonomy by Professor R.J. Breakspere* and Dr P.M. Williams**
* Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, Queensland 4702, Australia ** Lion Laboratories plc, UK

ALCOHOL MEASUREMENT TECHNOLOGY
In this paper we identify six modes of alcohol measurement:

Fuel Cells
A fuel cell sensor is an electrochemical device in which the substance of interest, e.g. alcohol, undergoes a chemical oxidation reaction at a catalytic electrode surface to generate a quantitative electrical response.

Fuel cells are characterised by the following positive analytical features towards breath alcohol testing:

high analytical specificity to the chemical of interest
high analytical accuracy, especially at 'low' alcohol concentrations
linear response to alcohol vapour over a wide concentration range
no external power requirement for normal operation, so low battery usage
long working life
stable sensitivity with time i.e. low frequency of instrument recalibration
high reliability under various field conditions
Disadvantages with fuel cell sensors for breath alcohol analysis are:

a relatively high unit cost
a small, temporary 'fatigue' effect in response output when subjected to repeated doses of alcohol vapour at high concentrations; and
the need for periodic calibration
It must also be remembered that a fuel cell requires a separate sampling system, to inject or draw into it a small but fixed volume of the sample vapour to be analysed. Fuel cells, unlike infrared systems, are not continuous flow analysers. This means they cannot monitor the expired alcohol concentration curve, either to determine the passage of deep lung air, or to detect the presence of mouth alcohol.

Semiconductors
This sensor consists of a small bead of a transition metal oxide, heated to a temperature of around 300 °C, across which a voltage is applied to produce a small standing current. The magnitude of this current is determined by the conductivity of the surface of the bead, which may be affected by the presence [and concentration] of any substances adsorbed on to it.

So when alcohol [or one of many other substances] comes into contact with this bead, it is adsorbed on to the surface, changes the surface resistivity, and hence the standing current. This change in current is taken as a measure of the concentration of alcohol in the sample. The effect is a purely physical one: it is not specific to the alcohol molecule.

Semiconductors are non-specific to alcohol, non-linear in response to alcohol vapour concentration and unstable in sensitivity with time: and their effective working life is rarely longer than one year, but this actually depends to a large extent on how often they are used.

Further, since the surface effect by which they operate is dependent on the atmospheric partial pressure of oxygen, semiconductors have been found to vary in sensitivity to alcohol with changes in climate, and even more so at changing altitudes of operation.

Furthermore, caution should be taken when reviewing the claims made by some suppliers and distributors about the type of alcohol sensor employed in their instruments. The term 'fuel cell' has been used to describe sensing devices which are clearly semiconductors, as opposed to true fuel cells operating on elctrocatalytic principles and being dependent on the chemical [as opposed to purely physical] nature of the process.

Infrared Absorption
These analysers operate on the principle that organic substances absorb infrared light at various wavelengths depending on their atomic make up and molecular structure. The quantity of radiation absorbed depends on the concentration of absorbing substance present in the sample, and is thus a measure of it.

In such circumstances, therefore, the difference between the amount of infrared light entering one end of the sample chamber from that received at the other end is measured and taken as being proportional to the concentration of absorbing chemical vapour [breath alcohol] present in that chamber.

One advantage that infrared systems have over and above fuel cell and semiconductor sensors is that they are continuous flow analysers. This means that they are able to track the shape of the alcohol concentration curve during the course of an expiration, which allows the presence of both deep lung breath and mouth alcohol to be detected.

There is an argument in the scientific world as to whether infrared light in the 3 or 9 microns region of the spectrum should be used for breath alcohol testing. Each has its benefits.

Gas Chromatography
This technique involves injecting a small sample of the substance of interest [in this case, breath] into a heated separating column, through which it is then forced by a carrier gas. . The volatile components are separated from each other as they pass through the column, and enter a detector in discrete bands. The time taken for the appearance of each substance may be used to help identify it, whereas the size of the detector response is used as a measurement of its concentration.

Colorimetry
The oxidation of alcohol by an acidified solution of potassium dichromate, resulting in a quantitative yellow to green colour change, has been used in various early instruments.

The analytical principle is also still employed in disposable alcohol detector tubes (the bag and tube) used essentially for screening purposes.

Dual Sensing
Some companies are now combining two technologies - e.g. infrared and fuel cell - into one instrument.

In this paper we have discussed four major descriptors. It can be seen from descriptor (1) (Applications) that all instruments can be used for screening but that not all instruments can be used evidentially: some devices have multi applications. Thus in the instrument classifications proposed only (2), (3) and (4) are deemed appropriate to be descriptors.....
 
Crush up a line of chromium six crystals and rail it hardKore, if your nose turns green you're not allowed to drive. ;) j/k

BT
 
OK, it came today. Seems solid enough. Doesn't do much if you get a negative test. And I'm working in the morning tomorrow and the last thing I feel like right now is a drink - so I'll get hammered in the name of science tomorrow night and let you know how it goes... :)
 
^ I went and met up with friends on Monday night and had two schooners of full strength beer in an hour and a half. Drove home along main roads and got stopped at an RBT. When asked if I had consumed any alcohol I told the cuntstable I had two beers and just finished my last beer like 5 mins before. He said there may residual alcohol in my mouth and asked me to park 10 metres in front. Advised taht we were going to wait for 15 mins before testing. breath tested me 10 mins later. I was a bit nervous cos 2 x 425ml is more than two standard drinks. Anyway the reading was 0... even though I could still taste alcohol. I would have thought it would have at least registered something.

there you go, hope that helps your regression testing ;)
 
The old residual breath alcohol reading. I'd forgotten about that. My girl narrowly escaped a high recording via this one, but as the story is not a 5 word one I'll leave it at that.

The point is, if you say to the officer that you've just had a drink, the cops are required to give you 15mins [?] to allow that to settle, which of course give you achance to practice your deep breathing - but don't pass out from hyperventilating ;)
 
Test 1: I didn't really feel like getting slaughtered tonight (working again tomorrow), so I came home today with a half-bottle of red and shared it with Dad over dinner. I had the majority of it, which would probably equate to about 2.5 standard drinks over about 45mins.

Did the test after dinner, and registered a >0.02% reading, which means that I was apparantly somewhere between 0.02% and 0.05%. Which seems fair enough - that's probably what I'd expect based on what I'd had to drink (with a meal).

Tested again four times while I'm typing this, and the results were 2 reading of >0.02%, and 2 readings of nothing (nothing happens when you are below 0.02%, which is a shame cos it'd be nice to have some indication that it did actually register the test). So either I'm teetering right on 0.02%, or it does actually have a bit of a varience - probably based on how hard or long you blow into it for. One of the two positive tests (the last of the 4) did take about 10 seconds to register though, so maybe I wasn't waiting long enough on some of the other ones. The instructions say to wait 3-6 seconds, but I guess it wouldn't hurt to wait about 20 seconds to make sure. It also has instructions (albeit badly translated into english from god only knows what original language) about how to do an "accurate test" - it says to turn it on and off a couple of times before running a test. The two positive tests out of the four were done using this method, while the two negative tests were done simply by turning it on and breathing into it. So that also might be a factor.

So far, my opinion of it is pretty good. For $34 (after postage) I can't really complain, and if as was mentioned above it's used to avoid driving even in the 0.02% range, it could be invaluable to avoiding driving over the limit without realising.

If you've got the spare cash and are somewhat curious, my initial recomendation is that it's worth it. I'll do the "fully smashed" test sometime soon, but I'll save that for the next time I was actually going to get smashed, rather than just sit at home and drink cheap cooking brandy... ;)
 
Top