Ugh, finals week. Kill me now.
Currently writing a 15 page paper paper on prop 13 in california. Its probably the most important piece of citizen initiated legislation ever in the US and is a big reason for many of the problems that the state is facing. Ive learned a lot about californias political structure in this class and one thing that I definitely take away from it is that the initiative process is broken. People want quality government services, but they dont want to have to pay taxes for them. The initiative process allows them to vote for tax limitations while demands for government services are staying the same or increasing. The result is voting to under-fund and overspend, even in liberal states like California.
13 also creates a huge state bureaucracy that controls property tax revenue, which leads to top down decision making. This type of decision making leads to resentment among local communities that were used to seeing their property taxes go directly back into their community instead of being doled out at the states discretion. So even though property taxes are extremely low in California, people can still find reasons to bitch about it.
In response to 13 many cities now use a fee for service system to pay for services that used to be paid for in property taxes. Things like trash pickup, road cleaning ect all have fees attached, or have been cut from the budget entirely. This results in a loss of "public goods" projects like parks, because there is no way to charge a fee to pay for them. The end result is that most california cities have much less public works, and in general spend a lot less money overall maintaining the city, especially in poor areas where people cannot afford to pay service fees.
Also been studying Rousseaus discourse on the origins of inequality. Its almost funny how the curriculum teaches you about a certain philosophy, then moves on to the next set of ideas which are completely contrary to what you just learned, makes it all seem rather pointless.