Cotcha Yankinov
Bluelight Crew
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2015
- Messages
- 2,952
Hahahaha you're eyeballing noopept? That's pretty ballsy lol, the dosage is supposed to be like 10mg-30mg :0
„The subject is very simple: taking NDRI for years creates a tolerance not only in dopaminergic and noradrenergic receptors (their sensitivity or even quantities), but also in protein reuptake. NDRI no longer work as you need to. Taking DXM, etc. little bit helps, but not enough.
Of course break from NDRI helps, but turns tolerance very slowly.
I think a little about that and below I wrote what I suspect (not necessarily have to be truthful, I did not find adequate research on this topic):
Tolerance to NDRI formed on the specific substances and also includes a tolerance reuptake transporters (DAT, NET and sometimes SERT for SNDRI). For example, a dextromethylphenidate (d-MPH) have Ki value for DAT = 161, for NET = 206. In my opinion, the tolerance undermines this factor and so, for example, after a while the occurrence of tolerance, Ki DAT may be, for example 300-400, and add higher doses refutes for example to 250. In turn tolerance to NET can grow slowly and, for example at the normal dose will DAT Ki = 400, the NET = 206. Therefore, taking the higher dose did not give full effect, and only a partial improvement, but the deterioration of other effects (which is also certainly additional substrate [de]sensitization of receptors). I noticed that at methylphenidate and ethylphenidate there is cross-tolerance, due to the similarity of molecules.
I noticed that at metylofenidacie and metylofenidacie there is cross-tolerance, due to the similarity of molecules.
However, when given another NDRI this tolerance has not occurred (!!!). I tested this with a variety of other NDRI and NRI, including bupropion, reboxetine, 2-DPMP, even low doses of cocaine.
I conclude that tolerance to transporters (I note that this is still only my theory) is selective for certain substances, or one substance can no longer give full effect, but the second one did. That means that it is possible to administering of other NDRI also reverses tolerance to the NDRI which we taken for a long time, but are not just as strong as amphetamines (as describe below).
But this is not the end, another suspect is the acceleration transport reuptake (RE). I suspect that when administered to specified NDRI for a long time reuptake works faster and faster pulls back monoamine from synapses. It is known that type substances NDRI not block 100% monoamine transporter proteins, so some of them still active despite the action of the substance, and I suspect that this part increases the rate of uptake for reduce the effect of transporters blocked.
Here it comes the magical effect of amphetamines, or reversing the direction reuptake. For example, the PEA running on the DAT and the NET in such a way that the uptake is not blocked, but its direction is reversed. So DAT protein, and the NET "take" monoamines with bubbles nerve endings and "throw" them to synapses. PEA is therefore an indirect releaser (through reuptake transporters) and "blocker" (in quotes because uptake is not blocked, but it does not work in the usual way - throw monoamines to the synapse rather than take them into bubbles for future use).
Thus, DAT and NET if they are not blocked by the administration of amphetamine probably slow down the release of monoamines was not so strong. After a long time formed a kind of tolerance on the action of amphetamines on the uptake, but this tolerance is reverse tolerance to NDRI. Not enough, that tolerance to specific substance falls (eg on methylphenidate), it is still probable tolerance "speed" reuptake also falling. As a result, when will occur tolerance for amphetamine, repeated administration of NDRI should have a very strong effect.
I tested this process several times taking in cycles NDRI and PEA + sele. Every time I cycled the PEA when I back to NDRI everything work as it should. So far in my experience, it is the most effective way to reverse tolerance, no other has given me such spectacular results.
If anyone has other suspicions or any other explanation for this effect, let him write go ahead. For me the most important thing is that it works
I think that after such a cycle PEA few months could additionally increase the sensitivity of DA receptors by the administration of light neuroleptics / dopamine receptor antagonists. Currently, I am during administering tests PEA together with such antagonists. The effects of PEA are weaker (eg no euphoria), but still noticeable. For some time I'll report how this process will be effective (I plan to shorten the time needed to reverse tolerance to NDRI from a few months to eg. 2-weeks - months). I am happy to hear your views on this topic, because maybe something I missed and it should be taken into consideration.
Action PEA reversal of tolerance NDRI may also have a relationship with agonism TAAR1.
It is worth to look at the mechanism of action NET frontal lobe. While in other areas of the brain DAT rules the roost as the reuptake of dopamine, but in prefrontal cortex dopamine majority is captured by NET. And this part of the brain is responsible for, among others, planning, logical thinking, problem solving, etc., and is the most stimulating this part we feel eg. the after taken NDRI.”
No. 5 mg selegiline and after 100 mg PEA once for every two hours.Concerta and PEA?