Dr. J
Bluelight Crew
Ok...after much research surrounding searches and seizures, I stumbled across a fact that seems to grant an enormous amount of power to police and I would like a lawyer or someone with more legal knowledge than myself to tell me if I'm right.
Person X is traveling at 45mph in a 35mph and is pulled over by a police officer. The stop is legit and routine, with the exception that the police officer decides to place Person X under arrest for this moving violation, knowing full well that, technically, any person may be placed under arrest for even these minor violations. (A recent Supreme Court decision upheld the arrest of a woman for a seatbelt violation) Thus, following this arrest, the police officer is allowed to search Person X and the passenger compartment of the vehicle. Following from this, is it logical to assume that police can bypass any type of probable cause by arbitrarily placing drivers under arrest simply to search their car? Or, is there some sort of "good faith" clause built in that I've missed which would exclude any evidence as a result of a search that was manipulated?
I'm looking forward to your replies....
Dr. J
Person X is traveling at 45mph in a 35mph and is pulled over by a police officer. The stop is legit and routine, with the exception that the police officer decides to place Person X under arrest for this moving violation, knowing full well that, technically, any person may be placed under arrest for even these minor violations. (A recent Supreme Court decision upheld the arrest of a woman for a seatbelt violation) Thus, following this arrest, the police officer is allowed to search Person X and the passenger compartment of the vehicle. Following from this, is it logical to assume that police can bypass any type of probable cause by arbitrarily placing drivers under arrest simply to search their car? Or, is there some sort of "good faith" clause built in that I've missed which would exclude any evidence as a result of a search that was manipulated?
I'm looking forward to your replies....
Dr. J