Canis aureus
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2005
- Messages
- 930
lso "replacement of the junk-dependent cells" means no shit imo
There was a certain trend in literary to write about addiction in terms of physical: cells, hunger, screaming etc; and there's even some truth at thinking about addiction as "sickness" of metabolia and cells. But remember that Burroughs wrote fiction and although he descibed addiction with words of physical, his intention wasn't to write a scientific explanations but metaphorical descriptions and causes, and so his words shouldn't be read too literally!
Junk-dependent cells are but metaphorical explanation given to physical dependence of opiate addiction, although explanations and causes ala Burroughs could be and often are much more terrifying! Similarly, when junkie's shooting dope he is figuratively feeding his junk-dependent cells and those cells are sucking all the junk from the shot like thousands or million new-born babies sucking the junk-milk from milking-bottle dropper; and when junkie's having withdrawals, all those junk-dependent cells scream voiceless screaming like all those babies left dying by their mothers; screaming would be hell to junkie and the voice hurts him cause he left cells die starvation; all cells having to die for the new generations with no junk-hunger.
Burroughs words are not exactly these and I don't know did he have that feeding or killing themes, but they could have been there. But some explanations are given by metaphors, differing degrees.
BTW, You could find the same sort of metaphorical reasoning from the books written roughly at the same time as Burroughs... Jean Cocteau writes about his WD's much the same way in his book about opium, though he was French artist and smoked opium before Burroughs shot dope. Burroughs writes more realistically, but there is that aspect of absurdity present there.
Of course, it should be remembered also that Burroughs' Junkie was written in 1950 and the state of scientific knowledge regarding opiate addiction was also quite much behind today's scientific knowledge. It could be fun to write a book which uses similarly metaphorical reasoning and figures but would be based on today's scientific facts and explanations. Of course, it would be more fun (easire at least) to read that sort of book written by someone.
Who'll start writing?